Tuesday, February 1, 2022

Kintsugi Roadmap Update

After a short Christmas break, the Interlay team is back with fresh energy to complete the launch of Kintsugi and kBTC.

What happened so far

When we released the Kintsugi Roadmap in October last year, we promised to make the process of Kintsugi becoming fully operational as transparent as possible, and keep you updated.

Here is a progress checklist with regard to the four main phases:

Crowdloan and auctions — done
Bootstrapping via Sudo — done
Govern via Community — in development
Community Expansion — in development

Where we are right now:

  • Kintsugi network is now fully decentralized, without any admin keys / sudo access.
  • The KINT airdop has been running for 1 month, with 92% of the 1 million crowdloan tokens claimed.
  • Sub.id added Kintsugi (all tokens)
  • Polkadot.js account page now works to check balances
  • Multisignature pallet added
  • Math wallet integration

Not directly related to the launch roadmap, but also important: KINT has listed on Gate.io, Kraken, and MEXC and we have partnered with GSR for liquidity and market-making services.

kBTC Launch Roadmap

Step 1: Kintsugi Dapp Release & Transfer UI — End of January!

We are releasing the first version of the Kintsugi Dapp (Kintsugi version of https://bridge.interlay.io/)

  • The first available feature will be “Transfer” providing a simple user interface to send tokens on Kintsugi

More info here: https://medium.com/interlay/kintsugi-roadmap-update-2c57042a8f9

Twitter: https://twitter.com/interlayHQ

Telegram: https://t.me/interlay_community

Medium: https://medium.com/interlay

Discord: https://discord.gg/YYzwpGrK


If no 1099-misc is sent to you, does that mean nothing is reported to the IRS by BlockFi?

To provide some context, I am in the process of generating my tax forms on CryptoTrader.Tax and TurboTax and I just remembered that I briefly deposited a small amount of BTC into BlockFi for a few weeks, if that, I cannot remember how long exactly but it wasn't for long. I probably earned a miniscule amount of interest, then took everything out and sent it back to my previous exchange of choice at the time.

I found the exact numbers, when I moved it out of the exchange, it was 0.04235586 BTC and when it went back it was 0.04288597. Later on in the year I sold a chunk of bitcoin creating a taxable event which includes the cost basis of that super small amount of interest I earned via blockfi.

unfortunately, I no longer have access to the authenticator I used and am trying to decide if it's worth going through the trouble of reclaiming my account to report this small amount to the IRS or if it won't matter. It was a capital loss anyway, so is it worth it or just say fuck it?


The Future of Interoperability

Interlay’s Vision: Trustless and Decentralized Cross-Chain DeFi.

https://preview.redd.it/eaulbhqv3bf81.png?width=1000&format=png&auto=webp&s=5b92041c0308e3d0cc6f18096edd1d2b06bbe22a

tl;dr

  • Existing BTC (and most other) bridge are all centralized and custodial. Just like USDT / USDC.
  • $17 billion worth of BTC is at risk — and could crash the entire DeFi market.
  • interBTC revolutionizes how BTC is used in DeFi — trustless and decentralized. It’s like DAI, but better (you can redeem for physical BTC!).
  • interBTC is just the start. More assets on more chains. Cross-chain DEX and OG NFTs. Smart contracts and moonshot projects.
  • 1st moonshot project WIP: non-custodial BTC DeFi. Keep BTC in your wallet, earn yield with 1 click. Soon(TM)

Mission: Any Asset on Any Chain. Trustless.

Two years ago, we started Interlay with the vision to allow anyone to use any asset on any chain in a truly trustless manner.

No more centralized custodians.
No more censorship.
No more Mt. Gox-like events.

The wise, old “not your keys, not your coins” dogma brought to blockchain interoperability.

Our path began with Bitcoin — the king of all crypto assets. Others tried to engineer DeFi onto Bitcoin. We decided to do the opposite: bring Bitcoin to the exponentially growing DeFi ecosystem.

We built interBTC, Bitcoin on any blockchain. A 1:1 Bitcoin-backed asset, fully collateralized, interoperable, and censorship-resistant. interBTC will bring trustless Bitcoin to any blockchain, starting with Kusama and Polkadot — it’s home-base — and will spread to all other major DeFi networks.

The Past: A Custodial & Centralized Reality

When a niche becomes an industry, innovation tends to be overshadowed by legacy methodologies — long proven and practical… but legacy. Similarly, the hyper-growth of the cryptocurrency space has caused us to forget the vision that started it all and accept lesser solutions for the benefit of market timing.

Take a moment to look around and you will find the old, centralized ways sneaking their way into DeFi. And interoperability is leading in this category.

Nearly all cross-chain bridges in use today are centralized and custodial. Users give up control over their assets and trust a 3rd party to maintain the bridge — without any repercussions in case of theft or failure, be it as part of a technical security issue or a regulatory event.

Two Types of Bridges

To understand why this problem arises, let’s recall the two main settings / types of cross-chain bridges:

  • Smart contract <> Smart contract bridges connect two chains that both support smart contracts. This includes the bridges between Ethereum and Solana, Avalanche, Near, and Polkadot. To this date, most apply a centralized approach, rather than using advanced verification techniques or cross-chain light clients. Few exceptions are Near’s Rainbow bridge and the upcoming SnowFork bridge between Ethereum and Polkadot, which have overcome the technical challenges and made use of the available smart contract functionality to come up with trustless solutions.

“No smart contract >> smart contract” (left) vs. “smart contract <> smart contract” bridges

Interlay’s interBTC falls into the latter category.

interBTC: Decentralized and Insured BTC DeFi

Clearly, there needs to be a better way to bridge Bitcoin and similar assets. What use is the decentralization of DeFi, if we’re using a centralized bridge to get there? We all know: a chain is only as strong as the weakest link.

Interlay’s interBTC brings decentralization and economic security to custodial bridges. It is based on the XCLAIM protocol, published back in 2018 as a peer-reviewed security paper by Interlay co-founders — with significant practical improvements conceived in the years since then.

The interBTC lifecycle: from BTC to DeFi and back in a few simple steps.

To mint interBTC, users lock BTC with custodians — so called Vaults. Yet Vaults are not trusted. They must lock collateral in various assets, such as DAI, DOT, USDC, with the interBTC bridge (more precisely, the Interlay parachain on Polkadot). If a Vault steals or loses BTC, their collateral is slashed — and users reimbursed.

This simple, but effective principle, together with sophisticated collateral balancing, cross-chain verification and governance mechanisms, earns interBTC three key properties:

  • Radically open. Anyone can become a custodian of BTC (= Vault), anytime. Anyone can keep their own BTC in custody. Vaults can implement additional security measures like threshold signatures, trusted execution environments, MPC protocols and the like. But they don’t have to. If one Vault goes down, it will not affect the other Vaults in the network. No-one can stop anyone from running a Vault.
  • Secured by Insurance. Every custodian of BTC (= Vault) must provide more collateral than the value of BTC they are keeping in custody. Vaults lock collateral on the bridge in various digital assets. If Vaults misbehave, their collateral is slashed and users reimbursed. Users only trust that Bitcoin and the DeFi platform they use are secure.
  • Community-owned. Any user and custodian providing liquidity to the bridge (BTC, KSM, DOT,…), KSM/DOT crowdloan contributors, early backers, and builders will steer the success of the network via their governance tokens. They control the collateral assets, economic parameters of the system, and future innovations.

Trusted and centralized bridges (left) vs. interBTC’s decentralized and economically trustless design (right).

“Why should we care?”

You may ask yourself: “Why should I not simply use one of the existing, centralized wrapped BTC providers? Everyone else seems to be doing it and they’re fine”

The reason is simple.

Because there are more than USD 17 billion worth of BTC locked in centralized, custodial bridges. USD 17 billion that are backed by nothing but trust in a few centralized providers. USD 17 billion that will be instantly worth 0 if the centralized custodians are hacked, subpoenaed, lose their keys, or decide to steal. USD 17 billion that would turn into USD 0 — and cause a cascade of liquidations and failures across the entire DeFi ecosystem, hitting both small and major players (e.g. MakerDAO) alike.

USD 17 billion worth of BTC that stands in contrast to what Bitcoin set out to achieve.

The top 3 wrapped BTC providers are all centralized and account for $17.5 billion worth of locked BTC (99% of all wrapped BTC). Source: https://defipulse.com/btc

USD 17 billion that could be secured by a decentralized set of collateralized interBTC Vaults. A system, where the worst case scenario, if all Vaults collude and run away with BTC, is that interBTC would be backed “only” by a sophisticated multi-collateral system — and users could get their money back, should they want to.

Indeed: the “worst case” scenario for interBTC, if all BTC is simultaneously stolen, is becoming the equivalent of Maker’s DAI for Bitcoin: a BTC stablecoin backed by multi-asset collateral and price oracles. That doesn’t sound too bad, does it?

The Grand Coup: Non-Custodial Cross-Chain DeFi

While interBTC revolutionizes BTC bridges, it is still not Interlay’s end-goal.

Attentive readers by now spotted that interBTC is decentralized and economically trustless — but still custodial. Yet, our vision was driven by the “not your keys, not your coins” dogma?

Unfortunately, we have realized and proven that it is impossible to build a fully fungible wrapped BTC asset while keeping the bridge non-custodial. Once again we are forced to choose between usability and security.

But, do we really need fungibility?

However, we have come to realize that this choice is not as bad as it sounds.

If we take a look at DeFi today, asset fungibility is achieved by following standards such as ERC20. Often, however, assets in DeFi actually do not need to move freely: supplying collateral for stablecoins like Maker’s DAI or Acala’s aUSD does not require the collateral asset to be transferable between users. Rather, the collateral asset is locked with a smart contract in a non-custodial manner by the user taking out the stablecoin position.

Codename: LayBTC

With this in mind, we started working on a new type of Bitcoin bridge — codename layBTC. LayBTC would not just be a bridge — it would be an entirely new paradigm of using Bitcoin in DeFi, shifting focus from flexibility to security and ease of use.

Imagine: BTC in your wallet while you earn DeFi yield on Polkadot, Ethereum etc. with only 1 click. BTC DeFi not only for the DeFi degens — but for the mainstream user.

We don’t want to tease too much at this point. We’re making good progress and are on track to a release in 2022. Keep an eye on our channels — a few hints, maybe even a technical paper might drop soon.

Outlook: Beyond Bridges and interBTC

So far, we’ve focused our discussion on bridges, specifically for Bitcoin. However, the technology built by Interlay can be so much more.

Expansion dimensions of the Interlay Network, beyond interBTC.

From interBTC to Multi-Chain DeFi Network

As a starting point, the interBTC Core Bridge will be expanded in four dimensions:

  • Assets. More underlying assets, such as DOGE, LTC, ZEC and any chain where cross-chain light clients are not feasible, can be bridged using Interlay’s technology. We will be encouraging and supporting the community expanding the bridge — it will not only be Interlay who can and will extend the system. Interestingly, the framework works not only for crypto, but also real world assets
  • Networks. From Kusama and Polkadot, interBTC and all other bridged assets will be made available to all major networks. The work on Ethereum and Cosmos has already commenced. Others will follow soon.
  • Collateral. As a multi-collateral system, a diverse set of backing assets with different risk profiles is critical for security, but also economic efficiency. Interlay will support the community in identifying and analyzing suitable collateral candidates, varying from stablecoins, LP tokens, liquid staking assets, perhaps even NFTs.
  • Trust. Finally, the bridge can be extended to support other, less decentralized trust models. While not the ultimate goal, smaller communities struggling to attract sufficient backing collateral may e.g. opt for hybrid models, where a some level of trust is required but a partial insurance is provided. Communities will be free to use the Interlay Network to bridge other assets in whatever way they feel is best suited. In some cases, e.g. real world assets, a fully trustless setup might not be possible by design.

Bridged Based Products

With the already announced support for smart contracts (EVM / WASM support on the roadmap), tailored to Bitcoin and any other assets bridged via the Interlay Network, a completely new pallet of products can be built by the community. For example, in the early days, Interlay once built a prototype for a decentralized BTC options platform with new forms of hedging and trust-minimized leverage. This and many more can be built on top of the Interlay Network using an optimized set of cross-chain functions.

Integrations

The decentralized and trustless nature of interBTC must be accompanied by a simple UX — users should not be forced to choose between security and usability. As such, wallets and on- and off-boarding via exchanges will play an important role in adoption and will be the focus our Interlay’s efforts early on.

Moonshot Projects

Last but not least — my (Alexei) personal favorite. Every once in a while an idea comes along that has the potential to revolutionize how we use crypto. Many of these turn out to be infeasible or simply don’t work. Yet, by exploring unconventional ideas or attempting to solve impossible challenges, we learn and get a step closer to success with other projects. InterBTC started as a moonshot project. Project layBTC is another. Who knows what we can come up with as a community?

Moonshot projects like layBTC will

About Interlay

We envision a future where blockchains seamlessly connect and interact: anyone can use any digital asset on any blockchain, trustless and without limitations. We work with Bitcoin, Ethereum, Polkadot, Cosmos and others to expand interoperability, capital efficiency and openness.

Our flagship product is interBTC — Bitcoin on any blockchain. A 1:1 Bitcoin-backed asset, fully collateralized, interoperable, and censorship-resistant, realizing the true free nature of BTC and decentralized finance. Kintsugi is our canary network on Kusama — the innovation hub of the Interlay network.

Follow our Twitter, Telegram and Discord to keep up to date with daily updates from the team, or visit our website.

#Interlay - #Kintsugi - #INTR - #KINT - #kBTC - #interBTC


What sets Interlay apart from its competitors?

Here we can highlight:

Why are we doing interBTC?

I’d like to use a comparison first. We like to insure things. We like to be one the safe side, generally. We insure cars, we insure our phones, our houses. We even have insurance for the USD that we have in the bank other than from the government or from banks themselves.

Then, with Bitcoin for some reason we don’t have that if we use it in DeFI. If you want to use Bitcoin in DeFi today, you have to go through a centralized provider or a centralized exchange. And let’s take the two-three biggest wrapped Bitcoin providers. You have wBTC, you have renBTC, you have hBTC. All of them are centralized today. In the end you have to trust these intermediaries. I am not saying that they will steal your Bitcoins, I really doubt that. These are great teams that have achieved a lot in the ecosystem. But it goes against the vision. You always have the risk that there is a hack, that there are regulator events or that you have to prove where the BTC came from. And you didn’t even, well, you weren’t prepared for that.

The risk here is you have I think today it’s $15 billion worth of BTC on Ethereum that is backed by trust. And this is $15 billion USD worth of BTC that can turn to zero from one day to another if there is a hack. This is not just isolated to the centralized Bitcoin wrap version itself. If you look at MakerDAO, MakerDAO uses wBTC as collateral and it’s pretty big on that. If wBTC fails, I don’t know what will happen to MakerDAO and to other projects that use it as collateral.

This is essentially the unique value proposition that you have in interBTC. You don’t need to trust any single person. You have a decentralized network of Vaults, where anyone can run Vaults and the only thing you need to do is that you provide collateral. You insure people who use your service against human behavior. It’s a model following the collateralization scheme of DeFi. This is exactly how interBTC works.

  • If you steal as a Vault, you lose your collateral and this collateral will be used to reimburse the users.
  • As a user, you always know: You get your Bitcoin back, or, in the worst case scenario, you will be reimbursed an insurance and you can use that to buy Bitcoin, and you can always lead the system and you always know you will not face financial damage due to someone stealing your BTC.

This is essentially a very clear and unique value proposition for anyone who plans to use Bitcoin in Defi, and not just for a few trades, but long term. Use it as collateral, for example, lock it up in DeFI protocols to earn yield. But in particular, for DeFi protocols, like stablecoin lending platforms and so on, which rely on interBTC as a liquidity collateral asset. Because for them there is no quick exit, they depend on the security of the protocol and the Bitcoin that they use.

If it is centralized, well I mean, you know what they say: The chain is only as strong as the weakest link. So, if the weakest link is your centralized Bitcoin bridge, then your DeFi is at risk. This is essentially what interBTC solves.


Crypto Conversion Tax

Coinbase says crypto conversions are taxable events and irs.gov confirms it.

So if I bought $500 in Bitcoin then converted it to USDT for a $500 value then sold the USDT for $500 USD, I essentially gained NOTHING, but Coinbase is saying I have $500 in short term gains! Something doesn't seem right here.


A List of YouTube Channels

Biology:

Physics:

Chemistry:

General Science:

Anatomy/Medicine:

Science Experiments and Building Stuff:

Math:

Electronics:

Engineering:

Computer Science:

Space:

Iconic:

Lectures:

General Explanation:

Motivation:

Music:

Chill:

Outdoors:

History:

Documentaries:

Workshop:

Blue Collar:

Comedy:

Philosophy:

Other:

Podcasts:

Booklist:

Useful Websites:

Browser Extensions:

Online Learning: