One group supports bigger blocks, an unchanging protocol, and restoring some of the basic, original opcodes.
Another group changes the protocol every six months, has a mysterious second layer application that may benefit from the protocol changes they created, denies hash power determines the winner of bitcoins fate, recklessly ignores the economics of bitcoin, thinks they and only they direct bitcoin, and already created several disasters like the "cash" denomination debacle and the "bitcoincash:" address disaster.
Which group do you support? Which strategy will lead to worldwide economic freedom through bitcoin? Which group is either incompetent, evil, or both, and which group is perfectly rational?
Remember, "Small minds discuss people, average minds discuss events, and great minds discuss ideas"
Let's discuss ideas and forget the people.
I know which idea I agree with.
No comments:
Post a Comment