Monday, November 23, 2020

Hayden Otto (/u/CryptoStrategies) does not deserve your forgiveness or money

I’ve been a bit dumbstruck by how many have just welcomed this two faced punk right back into the fold with open arms and kisses like he wasn't an ABC/IFP shill and a troll right up until November 15th.

He's still an ABC/IFP apologist and whitewasher acting like they were not the hostile force trying to extort the chain and the community directly into their own pockets with an 8% subsidy, doctoring history to say ABC split "amicably" while it was in fact cast out with extreme prejudice by 99% of the miners and community with little resistance.

He doesn't deserve your forgiveness or a paycheck through Flipstarter (of which he's announced a whole new one in another show of arrogance).

If BCH is to actually move on from ABCs attempted extortion and the critical damage it's caused, those responsible for it should be cast out and shamed just like Amaury Sechet and his troll lapdog Shammah Chancellor along with their shitfork. Hayden Otto is another prominent person that went to the dark side against the greater ecosystem and community that helped and is trying to act like he didn’t now so he can keep leeching off of all of you in bad faith. After railing against BCHN for months, suddenly he's ok taking cash to market it post-fork as the default BCH chain.

So, here is a small selection of his hypocritical assholery, shilling, trolling, and slander to ponder while deciding if he really deserves a place here still:

BCHN supporters are the new Small Blockers - lie, cheat and steal to get their way.

Wondering why r/BTC has been a total cesspit lately?

Alexander Levin of ASICseer, BCHN supporter/financier, attempts to dox Hayden Otto. This is the kind of level people are stooping to now, if you do not fall in line with their demands.

Why is the Bitcoin Unlimited community donations being used to fund smear campaigns against Bitcoin ABC to the sum of $60k/year, through efforts like this and the BCHNOTAX group? source

Well the backtracking of voluntary funding proponents is now in full swing, as demonstrated by a number of replies to my above comment. All this drama was never about the IFP, it was about removing Bitcoin ABC from BCH. source

What do you think of the anti-ABC rhetoric which now plasters the top of r/btc daily for months on end? Do you think that is a good look for us? source

This has nothing to do with supporting the IFP, an issue which is now closed. Seems that you and a bunch of others have an ulterior motive to take down ABC by turning the BCH community against them. Anti-BCH forces have continually been attempting to do this over the last 3 years, given that BCH poses a great threat to the crippled BTC shitcoin and legacy financial systems. source

No, it's not. This is just a handful of individuals doing this purely to spite Amaury.This "Bitcoin Cash Node" is an exact clone of ABC, so the "No Tax" people rallying behind this have now revealed to everyone that they know ABC writes good code. They want to run ABC code. It seems this effort is purely about removing Amaury. The "No Tax" proof of social media game has been strong, but when it comes down to it they will likely fall short where it matters... with hash rate.source

This one aged like milk didn’t it

Their purpose is to do the opposite of what ABC does on all fronts to continue propping up their French man == bad narrative. This causes greater tension and division in BCH, which seems to be the end result of most things they do. source

This is not decentralised development and BCHN is the takeover attempt. Open your eyes. source

If it fails the "Bitcoin Cash Community" doesn't value: 1) Amassing large concentrations of BCH adoption. 2) Tirelessly promoting BCH in the 3rd dimension and online. 3) Organizing BCH events and conferences 4) Building your business purely on BCH That is what that says to me. Instead they value people who are troublemaker and disruptors who undermine the efforts of everybody doing what I listed above. source

One of several examples of him jerking himself off and being arrogant and pissy when his funding efforts are dashed because people don’t like idiot bullies that think they are owed a job and money for products they never asked for.

You would think that supporters of voluntary funding mechanisms would be encouraging others to utilize these methods over an IFP, to fund the commons. However we have guys like /u/NilacTheGrim, spoiling it for everyone, by doing all he can to discourage people like me from participating in voluntary funding mechanisms. Your actions and negative comments toward me and others will push more people toward an IFP rather than away from it. [source]

Oops…

Ahh the new BCHN Narrative (spin on the story after their hand was revealed): ABC is pushing a false narrative that we want to split, but this is totally not true. Really ABC is going to cause a split in November by activating IFP and then blame us for the split!

This totally ignores the fact the BCHN website used to state their primary purpose was to "neutrally follow the longest Bitcoin Cash chain without contributing to the risk of a chain split". This is now removed and when you look at BCHN plans to get rid of automatic replay protection and not follow the 6month upgrade schedule, it is clear BCHN intends to trigger a split and they're doing everything to facilitate that. source

I got banned from BCHN chat rooms, like the official BCHN one and also the "NoTax" group (operated by BU's Paul) , for no apparent reason. I got removed from the "Bitcoin Cash News" channel, which I operated and grew over two years to 2700 subscribers, for posting an article that spoke highly of Amaury Sechet. Edit: oh yeah and one of BCHN's top financiers also attempted to dox me and failed, published wrong address. These people are pure scum and frequently accuse their opposition of what they themselves are doing, as illustrated by the OP's post. source

The things you accuse me of are literally what the BCHN collective does. I even discussed it in the article, they spend all their time writing shit on reddit or read.cash instead of being productive like I am, onboarding new business and users to BCH. source

By the downvotes I guess everyone here wants to see BCH burn. Maybe i should fuck off and go do something else with my life, where my work and efforts are not shit all over by socialists? source

The grasping at straws to take over the BCH network and ticker is real LOL source

They got paid their 750 BCH and then failed to deliver on the promises set out in the flipstarter, like a number of other flipstarters including George Donnelly's. So it's clear the payment was for their allegiance against ABC. source

Go look at my comment/post history, I am a targeted individual. Its a wonder that Reddit hasn't handed out any bans to the people who are part of the coordinated vote brigading against me. source

Whaahmbulance alert

I have noticed this common trend where BCHN supporters will accuse an ABC supporter of being in a cult where they worship Amaury. It's just another instance where the BCHN supporter is projecting what is true of themselves onto their opposition, for they are the ones in an ABC hate cult. They are the ones who have distracted themselves from BCH adoption and building to instead focus their every moment on attacking Amaury and ABC, writing tediously long posts in an attempt to discredit and remove them. They have wasted their last 10 months doing this while supporters of the New Coinbase Rule are focused on achieving the Bitcoin Cash Mission, putting Bitcoin Cash in a position where it can become P2P electronic cash for the world. source

If you want to have hobbyists, incompetents and bad actors running the show, then you will get that opportunity after Nov 15. source

Ignoring the fact ftrader, an original founder of BCH along with Amaury, is who started BCHN after leaving ABC in disgust.

_

I could go on but that’s probably enough to illustrate my point. Its all out there for all to see for themselves. We let this kind of shit slide and then wonder why BCH keeps having problems.

Reap what you sow /u/CryptoStrategies. If you wanted to be a marketing arm for BCH then you should have made an effort to remain actually neutral, then your “I support the longest chain” narrative would have been true, instead of a being the hasty retreat it is after you realized you were on the wrong side of BCHN's unchallenged win.

You Ryan X Charles’d yourself and sunk your reputation throwing in your hat with ABC saboteurs, now live with it.

I look forward to your vain attempts to justify your relentless bullshit to the rest of community after all of your misguided, indefensible treachery.


No comments:

Post a Comment