Thread topics include, but are not limited to:
Thread guidelines:
Other ways to interact:
The following post by AutoModerator is being replicated because some comments within the post(but not the post itself) have been silently removed.
The original post can be found(in censored form) at this link:
np.reddit.com/r/ BitcoinMarkets/comments/bm0p56
The original post's content was as follows:
Thread topics include, but are not limited to:
- General discussion related to the day's events
- Technical analysis, trading ideas & strategies
- Quick questions that do not warrant a separate post
Thread guidelines:
- Be excellent to each other.
- Do not make posts outside of the daily thread for the topics mentioned above.
Other ways to interact:
- Get an invite to live chat on our Slack group
- Set your flair to trade pretend money in the Flair Game
- Weekly threads: Newbie Mondays and Fundamentals Fridays
- Altcoins Discussion: Altcoin Discussion
Thread topics include, but are not limited to:
Thread guidelines:
Other ways to interact:
Thread topics include, but are not limited to:
Thread guidelines:
Other ways to interact:
Thread topics include, but are not limited to:
Thread guidelines:
If you're not sure what kind of discussion belongs in this thread, here are some example posts. News, TA, and sentiment analysis are great, too.
Other ways to interact:
Thread topics include, but are not limited to:
Thread guidelines:
Other ways to interact:
Thread topics include, but are not limited to:
Thread guidelines:
Other ways to interact:
Chinese cryptocurrency mining giant Bitmain's hashrate has noticeably dropped in the past 30 days, according to the company’s hashrate disclosure update as of May 7.
Per the data analyzing the hashrate of all Bitmain-owned hardware, updated once every 30 days, the SHA256 hashing algorithm — which is used in the bitcoin (BTC) mining network — has dropped from 1,692.35 quadrillion hashes per second (PH/s) in March to 237.29 PH/s as of the beginning of May. This marks a noticeable downturn in the company’s bitcoin mining power.
When comparing with Bitmain’s numbers of last year, In July 2018, Bitmain’s SHA256 hashrate was 1,692.05 PH/s, registering an upstick to 2,339.21 PH/s three months later, in October.
As previously reported, the two mining pools operated by Bitmain, Antpool and BTC.com, contributed to almost 23% of the total hashing power of the entire bitcoin mining pool as of January 2019. However, six months earlier the company’s mining pools represented 41% of the market share, meaning that its share has been steadily declining.
In February, a report from Canadian wealth management company Canaccord claimed that mining became more decentralized and continues to diversify. At the time, however, the largest stakeholder still remained Antpool, the report notes. Data from Blockchain.com currently puts Antpool’s share at 16.4%, while Bitaps suggests it is closer to 17.1%.
In late March, Bitmain allegedly hinted that the release of its new mining hardware could hinge on the 2020 bitcoin block reward halving, saying that next year’s event could reverse its fortunes. In May 2020, the reward size will decrease from 12.5 BTC to 6.25 BTC per block. In line with previous patterns, some predict a bitcoin price surge ahead of the halving — possibly beginning around June 2019.
“Bitmain is now betting that its next flagship product scheduled to be released by the end of this year will turn out to be a winner in the mining gear market, capturing an expected rally,” an unnamed source close to Bitmain reportedly said.
Trade Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies with up to 100x leverage. Fast execution, low fees,available only on BitSEVEN.
Thread topics include, but are not limited to:
Thread guidelines:
Other ways to interact:
Thread topics include, but are not limited to:
Thread guidelines:
Other ways to interact:
Thread topics include, but are not limited to:
Thread guidelines:
Other ways to interact:
Thread topics include, but are not limited to:
Thread guidelines:
Other ways to interact:
Thread topics include, but are not limited to:
Thread guidelines:
Other ways to interact:
The following post by Ellistonn is being replicated because some comments within the post(but not the post itself) have been openly removed.
The original post can be found(in censored form) at this link:
np.reddit.com/r/ CryptoCurrency/comments/bl8j6s
The original post's content was as follows:
Back in 2016, enterprise “private blockchain” was a new, unfamiliar idea.
There were not many major players in the private permissioned blockchain space; a big name was IBM, whose contributions to Hyperledger Fabric has since brought its tech in front of the likes of Walmart, Nestlé, and Aetna.
You would think that the prominence and history of IBM’s brand would result in wide industry adoption of their blockchain tech, but instead, adoption has been sluggish and most solutions are still in the nascent proof-of-concept stages. This suggests that many of IBM’s enterprise customers are not satisfied.
The reason might be fundamentally about IBM’s technology;
IBM’s Hyperledger isn’t really a “blockchain,” and what it does offer is hard to use and difficult to scale.
When I worked at JP Morgan in 2016, I led an emerging technology group that researched and vetted blockchains for the bank’s potential use and strategic investment. At the time, we did in-depth analyses of early versions of Hyperledger, Axoni, Symbiont, Tendermint, Ripple, and Ethereum.
My team discovered that the blockchain options in the market were technologically subpar for real enterprise use cases. These tech problems ranged from having code compiled down to computer “bytecode” that rendered business logic unreadable — and therefore hard to check for auditors — to running so slowly that one couldn’t perform helpful business transactions any better than with a traditional database.
We used to joke if we were to go to our bosses at JP Morgan and tell them that you couldn’t upgrade your business smart contracts in Ethereum without hard forking the entire network,
We would be laughed out of the room.
So we came up with a list of questions that we asked at JP Morgan while looking at blockchain vendors.
Questions like:
- What language will this blockchain use?
- Is the language designed for safety?
- Can the system easily express complex business rules?
- Can you upgrade your contracts, i.e. establish a governance regime over any contract?
- Can the system interact with external blockchains?
- Can the system add participants (nodes) without drastically slowing down performance?
Using these questions as a framework, I believe that blockchain requires architectural elements that IBM’s system fundamentally lacks.
I’m also not the only one who has since suggested that IBM’s performance claims don’t add up; and while my colleagues and I don’t see the numbers game (transactions per second, node count) as the only factor in blockchain adoption, we do think it’s important to educate people on what a blockchain is and is not. This education will hopefully help everyone better understand the landscape of this emerging technology.
What blockchain is and isn’t
In order to really understand where IBM’s blockchain fails to satisfy, we need to look at the very definition of a blockchain itself.
A blockchain is a decentralized and distributed database, an immutable ledger of events or transactions where truth is determined by a consensus mechanism — such as participants voting to agree on what gets written — so that no central authority arbitrates what is true.
IBM’s definition of blockchain captures the distributed and immutable elements of blockchain but conveniently leaves out decentralized consensus — that’s because IBM Hyperledger Fabric doesn’t require a true consensus mechanism at all.
Instead, it suggests using an “ordering service” called Kafka, but without enforced, democratized, cryptographically-secure voting between participants, you can’t really prove whether an agent tampers with the ledger.
In effect, IBM’s “blockchain” is nothing more than a glorified time-stamped list of entries.
IBM’s architecture exposes numerous potential vulnerabilities that require a very small amount of malicious coordination.
For instance, IBM introduces public-key cryptography “inside the network” with validator signatures, which fundamentally invalidates the proven security model of Bitcoin and other real blockchains, where the network can never intermediate a user’s externally-provided public key signature.
In a Hyperledger node, the only signatures that matter for consensus are the validator’s, while the user signatures disappear into arbitrary data in the “RWSet” which is replicated through the network (see diagram below).
https://i.redd.it/seg59q9q9jw21.png
IBM plays very fast and loose with performance numbers due to their complicated architecture. The architecture, or shape of a blockchain, matters because it controls how information moves on the digital ledger.
The architecture of IBM’s platform is complex, involving non-uniform nodes, unreliable smart contracts, and many points of failure. Security-wise, its architecture provides assurance only within the system, meaning that there is always a risk that someone can subvert the intention of a user.
Moreover, the performance numbers that IBM Hyperledger Fabric claims are misleading. Hyperledger uses a multi-chain environment (they call them “channels”) as part of their confidentiality/network security. However, their transactions cannot be replicated across channels, meaning each channel should be evaluated independently from a performance point of view.
When looking at individual channels, IBM’s system struggles to get above 800 tps, but even a 16-channel configuration can barely get above 1500 tps, with latencies reaching well into the 10-20 second range at the upper throughputs.
Thus, to achieve maximum performance with IBM, you must deploy multiple channels, which require extra configuration, to achieve maximum performance (which still can’t exceed 1800 tps) with latencies soaring into the 10-30 second range.
Furthermore, that multi-channel network in real life would also be extremely complex to deploy, making it unlikely to actually get used in business.
Why smart contracts matter
The final point of consideration consists of the smart contract languages used to program commands in a blockchain.
A smart contract is not just a piece of code; it is a representation of business logic.
A smart contract may secure a house on the blockchain, assure a digital identity, or even just represent an escrow transaction between people buying and selling an old TV. It is important that a smart contract is reliable and always does what it says it will.
When it comes to building anything on a blockchain, you need to be able to represent what you want to do (buy, sell, package data, etc.) through smart contracts. The easier or simpler your language is to use, the faster you will build the thing you want and get it in front of the eyes of stakeholders.
IBM Hyperledger Fabric smart contracts (“chaincode”) can be written in a number of programming languages including general Javascript or Go. Supporting multiple languages might seem beneficial because it allows people to pick up blockchain without necessarily learning a new language.
But there are trade-offs between the convenience of a programmer already knowing a general purpose language and the security and safety that a domain-specific language provides. When the stakes are as high as in blockchain — where millions of dollars can be lost if code is buggy or incorrect because it wasn’t designed for blockchain — the smart contract language must be purpose-built and safe by design.
Finally, if programming languages are measured by user-friendliness, then coding for Hyperledger isn’t exactly simple.
In order to spell out the classic programmer intro sequence of telling a computer to say, “hello world,” you needed 150 lines of code that look like this:
https://i.redd.it/q96hzi8oajw21.png
The takeaway
While IBM still dominates a lot of the enterprise blockchain press cycle with their relationship announcements, it‘s important to look under their hood at what the technology actually can do.
When I participated in evaluating the tech at JP Morgan, we found that IBM’s technology did not stand up to its performance claims and definitely was not offering the simplest or safest solutions for digital ledgers. I believe that challengers will arise offer better tools, better blockchains, and a better vision for the future of our society and how we use technology.
STORY BY
Stuart Popejoy
Co-founder & President, Kadena — Stuart Popejoy is a co-founder of Kadena and has 15 years experience in building trading systems and exchange backbones for the financial industry. Prior to starting the company in 2016, Stuart worked at JP Morgan in the new products division, where he led and developed their main blockchain product, Juno.
NOTE FROM OP:
This piece has been extracted and formatted for better digestion from thenextweb.
***I find it interesting because we're seeing that IBM's Hyperledger doing a lot of marketing and partnership deals lately, they have a clear advantage because of their roots and credibility. Very insightful but it would be interesting to see how projects with existing blockchain deployments tackle this, from Aergo's Hybrid Blockchain by Blocko (Samsung backed), to LTO's network, and of course, Stuart's own, Kadena. Set up by an ex JP-Morgan & ex SEC. Not disregarding the host of other enterprise blockchains out ther...
Thread topics include, but are not limited to:
Thread guidelines:
Other ways to interact:
Issues that Miners are confronting are not insignificant or kidding issues, the degree that check of-work mining is concerned. Platforms like Bitcoin, Litecoin, and Dash are turning up widely persistently engaged. The capacity to control these systems has been set in the hands of a couple of current scale mining assignments that gobble up control. To fight, single diggers need to depend after mining pools. Those mining pools add to manage centralization.
In the prior year, delineating advanced cash turned as coherently helpful as costs achieved new highs. An expedient by and large extension of mining progression actuated the introduction of two or three new tokens. MinedBlock will make a devoted mining office which centers around mining various coins from inside the rule 50 by market top to ensure a different level of pay streams for customers to advantage from.
Through the proposed massive scale action, Minedblock will help improve the decentralization of coins where there are starting at now gigantic pools overpowering the hash rates of unpreventable coins. MinedBlock will in like manner be advancing toward a part of decentralization inside its own one of a kind driving force through by and large dispersing of its mining information
MinedBlock Limited will perceive commitment in regards to managing, dislodging comparatively, developing the physical assets and will remain in charge of any costs achieved past that of the remuneration made in the unfathomable event that the association advances toward persuading the chance to be un-valuable. At no time will token holders be required to cover any events if this whenever happened.
CURRENT MINING PROBLEMS
One of MinedBlock's key benchmarks is advancing straightforwardness to its customers. Minedblock will be totally open with its methodologies, enduring progress in like way, pay age.
All expense and pay information will be conveyed each month for concentrate by any token holders to ensure full straightforwardness of irrefutably the managed mining association.
Any wallet tends to ensured by the alliance will be circulated inside the researcher dashboard to give full recognizable quality. Mining exercises will be perseveringly watched and exchanged between coins when the weight and accomplishment rate change. A definitive target will be to manage most exceptional capacity reliably.
Website: https://www.minedblock.io/ Bounty0x Username: Victor100
Thread topics include, but are not limited to:
Thread guidelines:
Other ways to interact:
Thread topics include, but are not limited to:
Thread guidelines:
Other ways to interact:
Thread topics include, but are not limited to:
Thread guidelines:
Other ways to interact:
We are now doing 48hr trials
Beast TV is the best out there with it's main focus on Live TV and Sports.
Streams are very stable, high quality (50-60/UHD for most of the sports), and cover everything that a sports nut needs. Watch all of your PPV events like UFC,WWE,Boxing and more. It has UHD, HD, SD it is a clear picture and runs smooth just like cable. Beast TV gives users 3 connections over 2 ips when you choose M3U. It has 200+ USA Regionals 170+ Canada channels and tons more. It works on any device, mag, buzz, formuler,dreamlink, firestick, stbemu, smart stb, pc, mobile, nvidia shield, android boxes.
All for the low cost of $20 CAD
We accept
E-Transfer
Paypal
Bitcoin
Any questions feel free to message me or even join the telegram group.
https://t.me/joinchat/H8SpDBcrfIAFY5mNgI01Gg
I look forward to talking and letting you enjoy the best IPTV service out there.
Thread topics include, but are not limited to:
Thread guidelines:
Other ways to interact:
https://i.redd.it/lk5hhjo5auw21.jpg
Scams are the bane of crypto's existence. Whenever an initial coin offering (ICO) exit scam or Bitcoin giveaway scam makes the headlines, it generally serves to underline the risky nature of the cryptocurrency industry, at least for members of the mainstream media.
However, while scams undoubtedly rob innocent people of money and often weaken faith in crypto, they arguably have a number of positive side-effects for the industry.
From creating more pressure for effective regulation to forcing exchanges and traders to take greater security measures, they're a vital rite of passage for crypto, one without which it wouldn't be developing quite as quickly.
According to a CipherTrace report published in January, cryptocurrency scams and thefts deprived the global crypto community of USD 1.7 billion in total in 2018.
Despite this qualifying as decidedly bad news, this loss should also be recognized as providing valuable opportunity for the industry to grow. And perhaps the biggest reason is that, as the brief history of crypto has already shown, scams and thefts have been a significant driver of the push for robust cryptocurrency regulation.
"Fraudulent activity can never really be viewed as positive but it does help in pushing regulation of these assets higher up the agenda,” eToro UK managing director Iqbal Gandham tells Cryptonews.com. “Detecting illicit activities in crypto will be technology driven and the industry will also need to work with law enforcers to ensure a globally coordinated solution.”
This suspicion that scams create more momentum for regulation is borne out in the experience of most nations where cryptocurrency is popular. For example, Japan.
In January 2018, the Japanese exchange Coincheck was hacked, with the parties responsible siphoning away 526 million XEM (then worth around USD 400 million). Around the same period, there were reports that the Yakuza were money laundering using crypto, while the Japanese Financial Services Agency (FSA) was warning of the misleading and fraudulent nature of many ICOs.
As a result of such events, the Japanese crypto industry agreed to form the Virtual Currency Exchange Association on April 23, 2018. Then comprising 16 Japanese exchanges, the JVCEA aimed to establish self-regulatory rules for customer protection and internal conduct, and in October it received official recognition from the FSA.
Something similar has been observed in other nations where cryptocurrency is big, whether it’s South Korea, Russia, America, the UK, Switzerland or the whole EU. Regardless of the country, crypto regulation and standards have been proposed largely to protect consumers against the threat of scams and illicit activity.
"The side effect of fraud in the crypto industry has resulted in many projects placing much more importance and priority on their security protocols, in order to understand how they can better protect the company and user assets.”
But while fraud has undoubtedly played a part in highlighting the need for regulation, it needs to be pointed out that other factors have obviously played a role.
“It is not only fraudulent behaviour and subdued price activity that is encouraging and enabling regulatory developments,” says Iqbal Gandham. “Now that we are seeing more institutional players coming into the market and developing their own use-cases for blockchain technology, this has sparked more attention from regulators on the crypto industry.”
Given that the sheer extent of illicit activity pressures the crypto industry to regulate and develop itself, scams might also lead to greater adoption in the long run.
What’s more, scams have also had the counterintuitive effect of increasing the early adoption of cryptocurrencies. This might seem like an odd thing to say, but one factor helping crypto to maintain its growth rate in users in 2018 possibly was the scope it offered for making a dishonest profit at other people’s expense.
Of course, this view is controversial, and not everyone within the crypto industry would agree with it.
"I think that it's more likely that users are attracted to the crypto industry because of its innovation and status as an emerging industry," David Sapper affirms. "However, I believe that there may have been some users who were attracted to crypto in the early days because of the opportunity to make a quick but unethical buck."
And with an influx of fraudsters, the wider cryptocurrency market expands, with added members of the public being drawn in by the seductive promises made by deceptive ICOs.
That said, none of this means that scams are good in themselves. Indeed, Bitcoin emerged largely as a means of providing financial transparency and security, so it's clear that fraud is something that crypto will have to work hard at eliminating, if it will ever reach its full potential.
Hello friends. Again, we are here with a new technology that will make our lives easier and offer new opportunities.
Trade is the most impressive interaction between smart and social people. Since the beginning of human history has been engaged in trade. Trade is something we must apply to keep our lives alive today. Thanks to the trade, we can meet many of our needs because our lives are almost all taken care of. In the past, people used the trading method for TRADE and then introduced many innovations in the trade with the invention of money. For example, we need materials for cooking and we can supply these materials from markets.
What is Mining?
Cryptocurrency Mining is a computerised process which decrypts transaction blocks. When a miner processes or finds a block a few things happen: • Pending transactions are processed resulting in a transaction fee for the miner • New crypto assets are minted and awarded to the miner or pool of miners •
The next link in the chain is sealed and confirmed throughout the blockchain creating a permanent record of the transactions and the new generated assets In the early days it was possible to mine with any standard laptop or desktop but as technology has evolved and the blockchain difficulty has increased miners now need to use specialised mining rigs or devices. These fit into 2 categories: GPU Mining Rigs Graphics Processing Units (GPU) or graphics cards, as they are more commonly known, perfectly suit the processing power needed to run the complex calculations to solve ‘blocks’.
Mining and MinedBlock
Digital currencies became even more popular after the introduction of powerful graphics cards and the high value of Bitcoin. Ethereum (ETH) is a very popular digital currency recently. Ethereum, which causes companies to run out of stocks, is attracting more and more people.
Now there is a project in mining that will give a new perspective. Mined block token (MBTX))
MinedBlock wants to bring innovation to the crypto community so everyone can mining. Buying large quantities of mining equipment will help them achieve the best discounts.
They aim to build a large mining facility to serve mine owners. By accessing places where renewable energy prices are very low due to electricity costs, they will solve the problem of making the best profit from mining. Therefore, they will increase the share of mining.
Safed and 100% Transparency
MinedBlock have stated they will take full responsibility for maintaining, replacing and expanding the physical assets and also any costs incurred beyond that of the revenue generated in the unlikely event that the service becomes un-profitable.
ICO details
The total supply of MBTU tokens will be capped at 200,000,000
Initial Exchange Offering — 115,000,000
Public Airdrop — 10,000,000
Bounty Campaign — 10,000,000
Airdrop to MBTX Holders — 30,000,000*
Team/Reserve — 35,000,000**
Token price will be $0.10 per MBTU
https://www.minedblock.io/assets/MinedBlockWhitepaper.pdf
bounty0x username: germandivision
Thread topics include, but are not limited to:
Thread guidelines:
Other ways to interact:
https://i.redd.it/ir0plm1w5tw21.png
Hello, my friends, I am here with a novel written and a brilliant genius to rebuild each other by the Atomic Wallet crew. The crypto world is almost programmed; cryptocurrency, wallets, exchange. Crypto's not easy to swap for each other. To this happen, first you have to transfer your property into a trade (focus or division) working for a coin that wants to be needed to trade in exchange for Atomic Wallet
Read more:
Thread topics include, but are not limited to:
Thread guidelines:
Other ways to interact:
Thread topics include, but are not limited to:
Thread guidelines:
Other ways to interact:
Thread topics include, but are not limited to:
Thread guidelines:
Other ways to interact:
Thread topics include, but are not limited to:
Thread guidelines:
Other ways to interact:
The following post by BitDeer_Official is being replicated because the post has been silently removed.
The original post can be found(in censored form) at this link:
np.reddit.com/r/ Bitcoin/comments/blp6lu
The original post's content was as follows:
Thread topics include, but are not limited to:
Thread guidelines:
Other ways to interact:
(Apologies if I've said some of this stuff already. I honestly can't remember if I shared the older event story yet.)
I didn't intentionally aim to do networking in real time, physical space, with real humans, but there was the one thing with Sandy Pentland that I really just wanted to see what he was up to, and turned out to be this crazy World Economic Forum event. I only really talked to one person (and his assistant or partner or friend or whatever she was), Justin Bingham, who's the work partner of Tim Berners Lee, the guy who invented the web, and is trying to reinvent it, but it went well enough. I gave him my watercolor version of the Architecture and tried to do a couple minute explanation of it and a bit about how his work with Solid might be able to use it to organize ideas and not miss anything crucial. I don't know how much thought he gave it afterwards, but he seemed at least to listen to what I had to say. And the woman with him loved the visual look of it, so I gave her one as well, and she said she would hang it on her office wall.
I also gave a copy to Sandy Pentland, but didn't spend much time talking to him, for some reason. I just gave it to him and explained the basic premise of it being a routing system for a decentralized internet, based on math, or something. He, at least, didn't immediately lose it, as he kept it with his other papers on his chair during the rest of the event. :-)
Then, yesterday morning, there was a blockchain breakfast that also turned out to be entirely a networking event, based on a speed dating concept, which was weird (and not really how it was billed). But I did ok. I probably spent more time talking than anyone else, which isn't super impressive, but folks were interested and asked a bunch of questions, and even offered some suggestions. There was one woman who I got interrupted talking to who was really interested in helping me understand current approaches and how they might interact with my work. She was talking a bit over my head but was very generous and thoughtful and really wanted me to understand. So it's too bad that we didn't get to talk longer.
And I independently talked to two different people from the same company, which was nice, as they were working on something similar enough to what I'm doing to have a lot to talk about and suggest. One of them, a very sweet young lady, ended up having quite a lot to discuss about each of our projects, and that conversation was the trigger for me doing the new podcast I did yesterday.
Two funny things I noticed there.
I talked more to women then men. Not intentionally, on my part, I don't think. But it was very nice. And a bit surprising at a blockchain event.
I actually "knew" several people there already. One woman I've known for a long time now, and see often, both at these kinds of events (she's more ubiquitous at events than Ron Newman, I think, for those in the Boston area bicycle and community advocates), and at certain other places I tend to hang around. She's my biggest devil's advocate type person in my life, challenging me on pretty much everything, but with a sense of curiosity. It's extremely draining, but I do appreciate her. There were other folks there who even recognized me, while I wasn't entirely sure where I knew them from. I think at least one of them was at the Bitcoin meetup I went to. But I... honestly don't remember. Another I thought was from the Bitcoin meet up, but now I think he was at the hackathon that I did for the city of Boston/MIT, at the future festival last fall. And that woman I already mentioned who was really helpful talking to me was at that same hackathon, but we only figured that out when I mentioned being part of that, and she said she was too. She did look a little familiar, but I thought it was because I'd seen her talk at some MIT event, which is probably also true, as she is at the Media Lab (or was, at least).
So, yeah, I'm using all my "natural teacher" abilities to help me get past my introversion and letting folks know about my work, and finding out a bit about theirs and where there might be overlapping interests. I don't have a lot of energy for this, but at least I know I can do it. But I still much prefer situations where folks specifically and consensually choose to listen to my offerings because they are actively interested, rather than being uncomfortably forced by the situation. (I really wanted to help the organizers actually organize future events more effectively by having folks join specific discussion tables with problems/questions posed by the participants, as a way to direct folks to the most useful discussions and interests.)
Thread topics include, but are not limited to:
Thread guidelines:
Other ways to interact:
Thread topics include, but are not limited to:
Thread guidelines:
Other ways to interact:
Hi everyone,
I mined bitcoin for a few months back in 2013.
I stored the wallet on my MacBook Air in a multibit wallet.
Recently I tried to retrieve my funds but the wallet is saying incorrect password (I’m pretty sure the password is correct)
Apparently multibit Classic is very outdated.
I have been searching online how to brute force my password so I can transfer my funds to a newer, secure wallet.
I am not having much luck 👎🏾
I have the bitcoin.key for the wallet but not the wallet.
Can anyone help me please ??? I can’t use online guides as they all say I need the wallet (which I can’t find)
Thanks in advance 👍👍
Don’t worry if you missed out on buying into Bitcoin during its early years; the rise of cryptocurrency has only just begun. The best time to invest was years ago, but the next best time is right now! With new cryptocurrencies constantly being released and massive real-word corporate partnerships being formed all the time, the crypto scene is about to blow up in a big way. So don’t worry, even if you invest now, there are still some great returns to be made — Here’s how you can join in.
https://medium.com/altcoin-magazine/complete-guide-on-how-to-buy-cryptocurrency-easily-3e0d87e26e30
Thread topics include, but are not limited to:
Thread guidelines:
Other ways to interact:
The following post by AutoModerator is being replicated because some comments within the post(but not the post itself) have been silently removed.
The original post can be found(in censored form) at this link:
np.reddit.com/r/ BitcoinMarkets/comments/blm4wa
The original post's content was as follows:
Thread topics include, but are not limited to:
- General discussion related to the day's events
- Technical analysis, trading ideas & strategies
- Quick questions that do not warrant a separate post
Thread guidelines:
- Be excellent to each other.
- Do not make posts outside of the daily thread for the topics mentioned above.
Other ways to interact:
- Get an invite to live chat on our Slack group
- Set your flair to trade pretend money in the Flair Game
- Weekly threads: Newbie Mondays and Fundamentals Fridays
- Altcoins Discussion: Altcoin Discussion
Thread topics include, but are not limited to:
Thread guidelines:
Other ways to interact:
