Thread topics include, but are not limited to:
Thread guidelines:
Other ways to interact:
Thread topics include, but are not limited to:
Thread guidelines:
Other ways to interact:
Thread topics include, but are not limited to:
Thread guidelines:
Other ways to interact:
Thread topics include, but are not limited to:
Thread guidelines:
Other ways to interact:
Thread topics include, but are not limited to:
Thread guidelines:
Other ways to interact:
Thread topics include, but are not limited to:
Thread guidelines:
If you're not sure what kind of discussion belongs in this thread, here are some example posts. News, TA, and sentiment analysis are great, too.
Other ways to interact:
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/u-government-blacklisting-bitcoin-addresses-212554932.html
"The U.S. government is paying close attention to illegal activity associated with Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies.
And the government’s “blacklisting” of blockchain addresses associated with digital currencies linked to crimes is sure to escalate, cryptocurrency compliance experts say."
Personal
Reality of the Situation
Understanding the Structure of the Initiative
Understanding the Token/Recovery
TxQuick Role
Verification of Claims
Meet Our Team on Telegram
TL;DR
Our community initiative provides affected users of QuadrigaCX a chance to recover some or all of their losses over time. TxQuick will launch the first Proof of Reserves exchange, proving that all customer funds are fully backed! Once 1,000 sign-ups have accumulated, Quadriga Initiative and TxQuick will initiate the token/recovery program.
If you wish to participate, please sign up at https://www.quadrigainitiative.com/.
Requirements to Set Up a Pre-Claim
Feel free to ask any questions, share on social media, or let us know your ideas/thoughts! Our team is also open to any media interviews/enquiries about the initiative! We need your help to get the word out!
Thanks so much!
Thread topics include, but are not limited to:
Thread guidelines:
Other ways to interact:
Thread topics include, but are not limited to:
Thread guidelines:
Other ways to interact:
Thread topics include, but are not limited to:
Thread guidelines:
Other ways to interact:
Thread topics include, but are not limited to:
Thread guidelines:
Other ways to interact:
https://i.redd.it/8ik8zjy186i31.png
Except if you’re stowing away under the stone, I am certain you’d have known about Bitcoins and Blockchain. All things considered, they are the drifting and media’s preferred subjects nowadays the popular expressions of the year.
Indeed, even the individuals who’ve never mined a digital currency or see how it functions, are discussing it. I have more non-specialized companions than specialized ones. They have been pestering me for quite a long time to disclose this new popular expression to them.
I surmise there are thousands out there who feel the equivalent.
For what reason is the Smart-games stage unique?
In the following couple of years, Smart Games will pull in numerous players who currently use benefits that have not yet actualized the blockchain. They will be eager to change to Smart Games due to one exceptionally extraordinary bit of leeway it offers.
Each game played, paying little mind to the size of the wager, will compensate the client with a stage token. The quantity of tokens issued is constrained and not expose to expansion. When playing their preferred game, the stage customer will turn into a co-proprietor of Smart-games.
The more they play, the more tokens they will get. What they do with tokens is their decision: they can sell it on the trade or cause them to get profits that the undertaking will pay to every single token holder as per the extent of their proprietorship. This plan is made progressively alluring by the way that profits are paid not once in a year just like the case with offers, yet at regular intervals. All profits will be paid in TRON and sent to the client’s wallet. This cash can be pulled back quickly, used to pay for products and enterprises, or traded with fiat or other cryptographic money.
Smart-games make games and wagering significantly increasingly appealing gratitude to their one of a kind and easy to understand plan and incredible client support. Appreciate greater, increasingly incessant successes and get profits at regular intervals! This is the ideal spot for the individuals who need to play and win, yet additionally produce each day in the games showcase. Play without enrollment and store from your very own wallet and get a stage token for it.
Step by step instructions to play:
Ensure you have entered your TRONLink wallet or other wallet that supports the TRON arrange. Ensure there is a TRX cryptographic money in your wallet that is basically utilized by the TRON organize. Enter the wager sum that you will play in the “Your wager” line.
You have to modify the slider territory from 0 to 99, where your fortunate number may be. When you move the slider, your odds and winning rate will be balanced naturally.
You can likewise pick “Move Under” or “Move Over”. at that point Click the “Move” catch to put down a wager.
Affirm the worth exchange in your wallet. At that point the smart contract will arbitrarily produce a fortunate number from 0 to 99.
On the off chance that the fortunate number is in the territory you pick – you WIN!
Every single Smart-Game exchanges are brought out through our smart contracts on the TRON organize. This guarantees everything is reasonable and reasonable, regardless of whether the client changes the underlying worth they need to utilize. In the event that SEED is changed, arbitrary SEED will be created to guarantee decency. RNG Principle: when a player dispatches a smart contract, SHA-256 arbitrary hash, current time stamp and past hash obstruct from CoinBase are produced. At that point they will all be combined to deliver irregular hashes. It will be blended with timestamps and hashes from the past square to produce arbitrary numbers if the client utilizes his own underlying worth.
Step by step instructions to get Dividends
To get stage profits, you should solidify your token in the “Profit” window. Profits are credited to your equalization on the stage in TRX cryptographic money consequently. Collections are made distinctly for tokens that are solidified toward the part of the arrangement.
Least token for solidifying = 1 NSG token. To stop, drop, or pull back a Dividend – clients must guarantee that they have at any rate 1 TRX in their wallet to pay for the exchange. Tokens that don’t stop can most recent 12 hours. Sans non NSGs don’t get profits. To add TRX to your wallet balance, you should tap the “Pull back” catch.
you can win these “smart tokens’ basically by playing games on their stage, so you procure in any case whether you win or lose! “that is astonishing!” YES, it is, what’s considerably all the more astounding is the way that the more tokens you possess the more offers you get, and the to a greater extent a true stage proprietor you become, the more you play, the more tokens you get. The more tokens you get the more portions of the stage you HOLD. The more offers that you HOLD the more profits you get !! when will you get these profits? hows at regular intervals sound to you? shouldn’t something be said about paid directly to your TRX wallet in TRX ? not sufficient? go eat cheddar at that point! (pardon my french) It’s fundamentally free cash now boys&girls.
On the off chance that you don’t care for having full control of your gaming stages and getting day by day salary in profits while having butt-heaps of fun! (pardon my french) this is the stage for you!
Befuddled? try not to be, simply look at their stage now and begin playing games! WHY??? since the measure of tokens you get from wagering is limited! which means they will run out, which means the cost will inevitably skyrocket and you don’t wanna be stuck on the ground when you can be on the moon.
Official Links
Platform link – : https://smart-games.io/
Social Platforms/Platform information Listed Below:
WP: https://smart-games.io/whitepaper.pdf
Twitter: https://twitter.com/smartgames_io
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/SmartGames.io/
Telegram: https://t.me/SmartGames_io
Author: mrcryptohunter
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2669197
trx wallet: TXJAJ8cuBM4yq5FceJ1VanSndt1r1HJSGQ
Thread topics include, but are not limited to:
Thread guidelines:
Other ways to interact:
'''
Imagine you have the EXTREME luck that your wallet just generated seed which is used by another person and you see a balance totaling 40.000 BTC.
You scream from hapiness, as this event is practically impossible! Then you start to transfer out the funds only to find out that the seed actually is from a multisig address and you need another lucky day..
'''
Shower thought, being lucky and striking on another fat seed
Author: /u/Bitcoin_puzzler
The following post by Bitcoin_puzzler is being replicated because the post has been silently removed.
The original post can be found(in censored form) at this link:
np.reddit.com/r/ Bitcoin/comments/cubd9f
The original post's content was as follows:
Imagine you have the EXTREME luck that your wallet just generated seed which is used by another person and you see a balance totaling 40.000 BTC.
You scream from hapiness, as this event is practically impossible! Then you start to transfer out the funds only to find out that the seed actually is from a multisig address and you need another lucky day..
Thread topics include, but are not limited to:
Thread guidelines:
Other ways to interact:
Thread topics include, but are not limited to:
Thread guidelines:
Other ways to interact:
Thread topics include, but are not limited to:
Thread guidelines:
Other ways to interact:
Stop measuring git commits, it is stupid! On so many levels and from so many perspectives is number of commits a super duper terrible metrics.
Before I argue my statement, I would like to say that of course, it looks bad with absolutely NO public activity from developers over a long period of time (6-12 months). I say ‘public activity’ because there can be activity, as in code being written, without it being public. More about that below.
Some folks seem to be very keen on using the number of commits as an indicator for the success of a project. There are sites highlighting these irrelevant metrics, e.g. https://www.cryptomiso.com/
I have a masters degree in computer science and I've worked professionally as a developer for 9 years. I have developed two crypto libraries, one crypto wallet and I'm working on my second one. I will not mention which ones, primarily because it is irrelevant, secondly, I don't want this post to be downvoted for shilling any specific crypto project.
VCS (Version Control System), `git` is the most popular. `svn` is another, but older and not as used any more
Git is a VCS protocol, nothing else. Git is not Github. Github uses git
Github: is an American for-profit company owned by Microsoft (bought in 2018), it is one of the most popular code hosting platform using the Git protocol
Gitlab: an alternative to Github
Bitbucket: an alternative to Github, owned by Atlassian, who also develops Jira.
“git commit”: A commit is like a bookmark, when you read a book, you can either use a bookmark on every page, or read the whole book without any bookmarks. The commit is just saved locally only your computer until you “git PUSH”, see below
“git push”: Sending your local commit or commits to any remote git repo, which is a project hosted by any code hosting platform, e.g. Github.
“git squash“: Some people like to do many commits while coding, but just prior to pushing the code, they “merge” together all commits into a single one.
"commit --amend": Let's say I just commited a change in the README, and then I noticed that I misspelled a word, then I can fix that commit (changing it), and fixing the misspelled word, by using `git commit --amend`. Some developers do that, other just fix the misspelled word in a new commit. The difference is that `git commit --amend` results in one single commit (changed), whereas the latter results in two commits.
How often developers commit differs A LOT, and I mean completely. Personally, I tend to code for a couple of hours, days or even weeks without making a single commit (frowned upon by some). Whereas other developers might commit any changed line of code. When the code gets pushed to the VCS remote repo (e.g. Github), it is still the exact same code. But coming from me it can be a single commit, but coming from Alice it can be 1000 commits. Same code but a difference in a number of commits by 3 orders of magnitude.
In the example above, maybe Alice committed 1000 times (whereas I committed once), but Alice also likes to have one single commit per feature/bugfix/improvement she is working on, so she git squashes and merges all here 1000 commits one. So now Alice method and my method ARE EXACTLY the same, when the code is pushed to GitHub. But it is impossible for us others to know that Alice single commit, actually was 1000 commits prior to being squashed.
Even though most crypto projects are open-source, some code might not be open-sourced at first, but might be at a later point in time, so these repositories will be hidden from the public, thus there can be a lot of activity in a certain project without the public knowing about it.
Even though most companies/projects have all their repositories under the same organization in the VCS code hosting platform, some repo's relevant to the project might not be. E.g. if you look at Bitcoin's page on Github, you will find 4 repositories: https://github.com/bitcoin but some of its core developers might write experimental code in separate personal repo's (that might be private). Or repos not yet pushed, i.e. code sitting locally on her computer.
When Alice codes in a distributed project with many contributors it might be most suitable for her to not be using the projects repo directly, but rather a personal version of the whole code project, known as a fork (please not that this has nothing to do with 'forks of a DLT (e.g. blockchain)', as in spawning a new version of said crypto project, e.g. Litecoin and Bitcoin Cash being forks of Bitcoin, I'm talking about 'git fork' here). So Alice codes away in any branch, any number of commits, or a single one, in her own personal (git) fork of e.g. Bitcoin, her own repo. Then after some time (hours, days, weeks, months), she creates a Pull Request to the 'upstream repo' (original/source repo), and if other developers are happy with her work, it gets merged. So there might be activity, many of few commits, in another git repo, being a fork of the original one. The bitcoin C github repo currently has 23,958 git forks: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/network/members that's actually so many that Github displays this message "Woah, this network is huge! We’re showing only some of this network’s repositories". So in order for you to KNOW that there is NO activity for any developers, you would actually need to go through ALL forks (in this case ~24 thousand) of a repo to see that there have been no commits done recently. But as stated above, not even that is enough (the commits might not have been pushed yet, right?)
I just coined the term "wash commits", so don't google it (you will only get images of jeans...LOL). Just like there are wash trades, faking volume, any developer can either manually or using some trivial script, at a regular interval just add some character, e.g. a space, in any file of a project, git commit and push that change, and then perform another git commit removing said newly appended character. Then it will look like the project has activity. Hell, you can even do this in 10,000 commits daily, "Wow man! Look at all that activity! This crypto project is the best!" - well, no.
squash and no amendTwo developers, Alice and Bob, neither uses `git squash`, but Alice uses `git commit --amend` to fix typos an other smaller changes, but Bob does not. Since neither uses `git squash`, over a long period of time this might result in a huge difference in the number of commits.
When Alice and Bob, working in the same repo, wants to merge together their different features they have been working on, they can do so by using two different methods, either `git merge` or `git rebase`, they former results in one extra commit, a commit of the merge event itself, whereas the latter does not result in any extra commit. These are different styles of working and often debated which is to prefer. Over a long period of time this might result in a huge difference in the number of commits.
LoC = Lines of Code. The more lines of code, the worse, okay. Many LoC is NOT at all, in any way, a good thing. The theoretically (however, of course, impossible) best code base, is the code base with 0 lines of code. It is trivial to maintain, you just have to do... nothing. It contains NO bugs. Code is in its natural state buggy. So many commits ADDING new code are not always good. Better with commits removing code, given the same functionality.
Well you can't, that is my point. But if you want some tips of what to look for, using these metrics are actually relevant:
Thread topics include, but are not limited to:
Thread guidelines:
Other ways to interact:
Thread topics include, but are not limited to:
Thread guidelines:
Other ways to interact:
https://i.redd.it/t1wx2qwio5i31.png
CoinDesk traveled down to West Palm Beach on Aug. 5 to cover Craig Wright’s second sanctions and contempt hearing.
Wright, the self-declared man behind bitcoin, failed to comply with a court directive to produce a full list of his bitcoin addresses acquired prior to 2014, as part of a $10 billion lawsuit brought by Ira Kleiman, brother of Wright’s former business partner Dave Kleiman.
After an explosive first showing, Wright did not appear in court this time around. However, his acolytes and detractors sat in as witnesses. In this video CoinDesk breaks down the day’s events and speaks with members of the press and public that sat in to watch crypto history unfold.
The leader in blockchain news, CoinDesk is a media outlet that strives for the highest journalistic standards and abides by a strict set of editorial policies. CoinDesk is an independent operating subsidiary of Digital Currency Group, which invests in cryptocurrencies and blockchain startups.
