Wednesday, February 17, 2021

Finally AP'd While Awake And Maintained Complete Consciousness

Some people have experiences of APing while awake and I started out like this. I wanted to learn what was happening to me, and the best way was to practice APing on purpose.

So I can AP while awake and I AP while meditating. When I AP while awake, I have the body visceral movements and can get information through feelings. But because I'm awake and my eyes are open, I don't see what's going on.

Last night was totally different though.

I was laying down and kept APing, so I decided to ground myself. Grounding only stopped APing temporarily. When these moments happen, I try to take advantage of it when I can, and try to AP while meditating with my eyes closed instead.

So I started out with the goal of remote viewing, but I got interrupted because my bf had rolled over and woke up. He changed the channel on the TV and we started talking.

He got me some food and laid back down. After I ate, I was still awake and conscious... I felt my AP double exit my body. I didn't try to ground myself this time.

I was aware in the present moment and also aware of my AP body double's real time experience- while having my physical eyes open, yet able to see in some sort of Astral realm with AP eyes.

So this is what happened with my AP double:

While I was having a conversation with my bf, I was completely aware of me traveling back in the past to his younger self...all while he's exaplaining the backstory of a Chicago PD television episode in the present time.

My AP double traveled back in time and needed to tell my bf things to consider, so that his future self would be ok. He is 44, so I went back 22 years ago: he was 22 years old.

When he saw me, there was an immediate energetic recognition that he could not explain, but was very drawn to me. It's almost like he locked on to the frequency of my soul's signature and recognized it.

So I explained to him that I am from his future and that time of the future- he is 44 years old. When we meet in the future, I'm 10 years younger than him.

I also told him that I, too...have a self that is present in this time, but I'm 12 and living in California.

I could see that he loved me in his eyes and warned him to not view me in this way because I am not here to be a crush. I told him I know about his girlfriends so don't feel guilty about it, because we won't be kissing or anything of that nature. I told him that his future self tells me his life and his stories.

He then asked me if in the future, does he love me?

I said yes, sooooooooo much, in a joking smoochy type of way lol. So then I heard voices from people in his life that were affecting him. They came in sound wave spirals towards me. I didn't tell him what was affecting him or who- but I did tell him that just like I won't interfere with his romantic life and girlfriends...I won't interfere to stop these negative influences because they are his experiences and he has to live through them to learn.

I told him, a specific situation is not pleasant but you are going to make it worse by how you deal with it. So don't do what you've been doing. What you do now will affect you in the time I come from.

My 22 yr old bf listened and tried to get me to tell him different outcomes about the future, but I wouldn't tell him. When I saw his face look a bit disappointed, I told him if he ever heard the word "Bitcoin" to buy some. He said ok.

So then him and I walked to the area where my house would be built in the future, which presently, is not far from the house he grew up in.

I pointed at the trees and showed him this is our home, but it's not built yet, it's all trees and forrest.

I started telling him again that he has to change his ways. That in the big scheme of things, these issues blend together and are going to happen anyways- so why make unpleasant things.... WORSE? (At this time there was a third layer of consciousness that was higher than my AP double and I saw an even bigger picture of how things and events were interwoven- like fast flashing of times, but it wasn't meant for me to tell him this, and I don't think I could explain it even if I tried).

I also told him to promise not to tell anyone in his time that I came. I mentioned a specific friend of his by name.

My AP double told him I'll be back again to help.

So as the AP experience stopped, I was still in conversation with my bf in real time. He had to repeat something twice because I was a tad bit spacey, but it wasn't noticeable to him that my mind was in a different dimension. We finished watching the show and I didn't tell him about this until the next day.

This experience was a TRUE first time, fully conscious and awake AP - because I was getting the information as it was happening in the astral world, while being fully awake and conscious, in the physical world.

Has anyone else experienced a fully conscious AP and had two different experiences in two different modes of consciousness at the same time?


Portfolio Allocation & Bitcoin - The 2021 Bull Run Driver

Listen up folks,

Most of us were here in 2017. After the crash in 2018, we dreamed of another bull run, but deep down many wondered when or if it would come. It was pretty clear that the dumb money who got burned by vaportokens and ICO's was not going to return with the same irrational exuberance from 2017. We knew the next bull run would need a different fuel.

2017 was the bull run where crypto pretended to be Silicon Valley. You saw a lot of ridiculous justifications on why certain businesses needed to be put on the blockchain. Even more absurd was that they needed their own blockchain and token. It felt very reminiscent of the 90's tech bubble, because you had this promising technology (blockchain) being used to hype up new projects. It became a frenzy and many of us participated while simultaneously realizing the entire ICO sector was a joke.

This new bull run is much different. It's not characterized by vaporware and anonymous Russian crypto tokens pretending to Silicon Valley 2.0. This bull run is the result of the growing belief that cryptocurrency is an investable asset class and warrants a consideration for allocation in every well-rounded portfolio.

It comes at a unique point in time, where interest rates are 0 and fiat currencies are being printed at truly unprecedented levels. 10Y Treasuries are yielding just above 1%.

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/M2

https://www.treasury.gov/resource-center/data-chart-center/interest-rates/pages/textview.aspx?data=yield

People are absolutely flush with *cash* but there's very little places to put that cash. The stock market, especially in the US, and especially the tech sector, is trading at record valuations & multiples.

https://www.macrotrends.net/stocks/charts/AAPL/apple/pe-ratio

https://www.macrotrends.net/2577/sp-500-pe-ratio-price-to-earnings-chart

Many call it a bubble and expect a crash on equities (and BTC). However, a crash means that people are desperately selling assets in return for fiat currency. Once they have that fiat currency, there is no way to earn income on it, because interest rates are 0. And the Fed/Treasury has shown it is more than willing to print money in any major downturn, diluting the value of fiat.

So why would investors take the major risk of holding cash in a downturn? They would be heavily incentivized to buy a dip in equities, because once again, there's hardly anywhere else to allocate investment. Sure, real estate is another option. Guess what, real estate is booming too. Home prices are up 8.4% over the past year, and are forecast to grow another 10.5% this year, according to Zillow:

https://www.zillow.com/home-values/

So both equities and real estate are at all time highs. How about metals? Shouldn't Gold and Silver be in a bull market? Interest rates are near 0, Fed is printing money. This is the shocker. Following the 2008 crash, gold and silver went on a magnificent run, under similar conditions to today. It seemed like it was happening again this summer, as gold hit an ATH and went past the $2000 mark. But then, something changed.

https://www.buybitcoinworldwide.com/bitcoin-price-in-gold/

Sometime in October 2020, BTC completely flipped the switch on Gold and went from 5.7 oz per BTC to 28.12 oz per BTC. It really is quite significant, because Gold & Silver would normally be a great hedge against the risks we see in today's markets. This chart is suggesting that BTC is the new and improved version of Gold.

https://goldprice.org/gold-price-history.html

In 2008, after the markets bottomed, gold went on a crazy run. It bottomed around 700/oz and topped out above 1800 in 2011. Nearly a 2.5X throughout the recovery from the Financial Crisis. Compare that to the recovery from the COVID March crash, where gold went from $1500 to $2000, roughly a 33% gain from its bottom, and it's now down to below $1800.

So how does this all relate to portfolio allocation and Bitcoin? Well, portfolio managers are looking for ways to provide return on capital. Traditional asset allocation would be a mix of:

- Stocks

- Bonds

- Treasuries

- Precious Metals

- Cash

- Real Estate

Stocks & Real Estate are at all time highs. Metals are apparently being "replaced" by cryptocurrencies. Cash is being diluted and devalued. Bonds and treasuries return very little due to low/zero interest rates. So you see the conundrum for asset managers. They have trillions of dollars to allocate. Worldwide wealth is estimated @ $360.6T. USA alone is estimated around $105.9T.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_total_wealth

Wealth seeks investment. The majority of people's money does not get spent on yachts, cars, and private planes. It sits in a portfolio with the purpose of appreciation. Traditional portfolio allocations are being turned on their heads, because major asset classes provide returns below inflation (bonds & treasuries). Where the hell are people going to put all their money?

That is what is behind this recent cryptocurrency boom. And that is why *this time it's different™*. Cryptocurrency is a revolutionary new asset class which excels in periods of uncertainty, low interest rates, and the potential for high inflation. Bitcoin's market cap of $965.5B represents less than 0.26% of worldwide wealth, and less than 10% of Gold's market cap.

Currently, you are hearing many portfolio managers mentioning putting 1-2% of a portfolio into BTC. This is a breakthrough, because it signifies that institutions and large-scale portfolio managers are treating this like a real asset class worthy of allocation. As cryptocurrency becomes more accessible and cemented in portfolio management, it is conceivable for this allocation to move closer to 5%.

Imagine portfolio allocations of 5% on worldwide wealth. Suddenly you're talking about levels around $16.8T, or somewhere above $850K per BTC. Do I think it's going to happen anytime soon? No, that would be irrationally optimistic. But you can see the types of value we are looking at here. And none of these valuations or allocations depend on black swan events like the collapse of the USD.

TL;DR Bitcoin is becoming increasingly accepted as an asset class worthy of allocation in investment portfolios. This could drive price growth to levels that would initially seem inconceivable.

Disclaimer: I am long BTC


The Bull Case for Ethereum (extended)

Hello Ethereans,

A few weeks ago I posted A break down of the bull case for Ethereum and how it relates to Bitcoin on the CC sub. Since then, a few members from the /r/ethfinance sub have assisted me as I continued to work on a complete investment thesis for Ethereum. The original post has gotten the attention of Bankless, which is in my opinion the best Ethereum related news site that I know of. They will be publishing this thesis (or at least parts of it) once it is complete. Progress has been slow because it has been very hard for me to find time outside of my daily job and family, but I am finally almost finished with it. At this stage, I would like to ask for help from the Ethereum community to help to polish the thesis, and right any wrongs that I may be mistaken about. I have tried to cover all aspects of the bull case for Ethereum in a way that is accessible to a person with a superficial understanding of cryptocurrencies and economic principles. I am hoping that it could serve as a reference document to assist changing the narrative about the market's understanding of Ethereum.

Constructive criticism will be much appreciated, but no trolls. I also have a google doc open to commenting and I will post a like here if mods are OK with it (if not just PM me and I'll send you a link).

The Bull Case For Ethereum And How It Compares To Bitcoin

There is a general understanding among Ethereum investors that the technical enhancements that are currently being implemented will result in a sustainable monetary policy with near 0% issuance and the potential for ether to become a deflationary asset. What is even more interesting is that the net return of ether as a SoV (store of value) becomes superior to bitcoin the moment that issuance is lower than the staking yield. In other words, even if Bitcoin had already ceased issuance, it offers no mechanism to provide yield to long term holders with a negligible risk exposure as Ethereum does. There is an execution risk that Ethereum will not deliver on what is currently planned, but if it does, then it will become more scarce than Bitcoin could ever become under its cryptoeconomic model. However, the focus on scarcity as the primary contributor of value to a monetary asset is arguably misplaced. A dissection of the intrinsic value of money and how it is used can reveal a different story where value is primarily derived from the facilitation of economic activity rather than scarcity. In this regard, Ethereum has a tremendous advantage over Bitcoin because what is often described as “Ethereum’s utility” is actually the economic activity occurring in its digital domain.

It is impossible to separate BTC/ETH's payment rails from their respective monetary policies. Issuance is just a subsidy, and without it the network will need to operate as a profitable business with a cash flow that is entirely dependent on network fees. For this reason, the revenue collected from fees is the most important metric to determine the sustainability of a non-inflationary monetary policy. Circumstances around Bitcoin that reduce incentives from operating directly on-chain are a potential threat to its security model. We are observing new situations that are causing such degradation of the on-chain utility of the Bitcoin network. The incentive for users to transact directly on the network is being diminished by the tokenization into Ethereum (wrapped Bitcoins) and by the introduction of custodians (like PayPal) and traditional banking services who will soon be entering this space. If these trends continue, I suspect that the only activity that will end-up happening on-chain will be done by whales sporadically transacting to “hodle” and the occasional settlement from institutions.

Bitcoin seems fast and frictionless, but that is only because it is being compared to something in the physical world. In digital terms Bitcoin emulates the friction of operation that is found with gold: it is difficult and expensive to move it, securing it yourself is not trivial, and it does not make for a great medium of exchange. I don't think this will be a good dynamic to generate enough transaction fees. This may be just my subjective interpretation of it, but regarding this particular situation it is nearly impossible to make objective assertions at this point. It is possible to assert that, in the digital world, the expectation of frictionless money would entail near instant transactions with negligible cost and without the relative risk/paranoia of dealing with nuclear waste and having a hacker watching your every move waiting for you to make a mistake to snatch it away. Cryptocurrencies do not offer any mechanism to recover lost funds in case an account gets compromised by a hacker or a mistake is made during a transaction (like keying in the wrong recipient address); this is a serious problem. Digital money would also need to be fully programmable and interact with other digital assets, preferably defined and operated within the same ecosystem. Ethereum is steaming ahead on all ends.

Ethereum is fostering a digital economy (this is a very important part of understanding the value of ether) with DeFi at its center. It is currently generating about three times as much transaction fee revenue as Bitcoin. Layer 2 solutions are going live as we speak, and it appears that they will be much more practical and provide better UX when compared to the Lightning Network. This will help to amplify Layer 1 block space value and push revenue even higher. That will be followed by EIP-1559, which will help to stabilize fees, improve security related to edge cases, and create a deflationary mechanism through the partial destruction of transaction fees. Mining is currently excessively profitable and the hash rate cannot keep up. This means the financial incentives can be reduced, and by burning transaction fees we achieve the equivalent of an issuance reduction while stabilizing mining revenue. Eventually the transition to Proof of Stake (PoS) will dramatically cut the operational cost of the network. That means that Ethereum as a business will become more profitable and less reliant on the issuance subsidy. Finally, we will see the introduction of sharding which will scale Layer 1 by up to 1,000 times, compounding the effect of Layer 2 solutions and making it feasible for the network to operate as a platform for new use cases. A solution to the hacker/nuclear waste security situation is being explored via social recovery wallets. Social recovery wallets leverage Ethereum’s programmable capabilities to create a dynamic that is a mixture of self-secured “be your own bank” cryptocurrencies with the protection advantages offered by the traditional banking system. It is still in the early stages of research and design, but it is important to realize that the Ethereum community recognizes it as a problem and is working on a solution.

What is Ethereum?

Ethereum and ether are not the same thing. Ether is the name of Ethereum’s native digital asset. No one can buy Ethereum; when someone says they have Ethereum, what they really have is ether. A simplistic analogy would be to say that Ethereum is to ether what traditional banks are to the dollar. However, it is more appropriate to define what Ethereum is by comparing it to the internet. The internet is nothing else other than a network of computers running a data agnostic protocol to exchange information. Ethereum is a network of computers running a value agnostic protocol to exchange digital property. Both sound generic and unimpressive, but society has restructured itself around the internet, and in the next couple of decades Ethereum may have a similar effect upon it.

The Ethereum network is value agnostic because it allows anyone to create, issue and transact any type of digital asset (not just ether). This is very different from the Bitcoin network because it only allows users to transact its native asset which is also called bitcoin. Bitcoin with a capital B refers to the network, while bitcoin with a lowercase b refers to the asset that can be bought and transacted in the Bitcoin network.

Ethereum has one more trick that Bitcoin does not have: it allows for users to create and execute computer programs with the same awesome properties that make Bitcoin’s value proposition so compelling: they are inclusive, transparent, trustless, permissionless and censorship resistant; these programs are called “smart contracts”. They are operated autonomously by the network, and they can interact with any digital asset. This opens up a world of possibilities. Amongst one of them the ability to function as a global financial system that is in many ways far superior to the existing traditional financial systems which are siloed, inefficient and prone to questionable administrative practices and fraudulent activity.

In a nutshell, Ethereum reduces the friction of almost any activity that requires trust and/or permission by hosting a fully programmable money and the ability to create an infinite variety of digital assets while achieving a scalable infrastructure with a sustainable net zero issuance monetary policy. These properties make ether the world’s preeminent monetary asset by a large margin. There is nothing in the world that can be compared to ether with the same network effect of Ethereum. The rise of ether will generate an enormous amount of disruption to all pre-existing forms of reserve and monetary assets - it effectively makes them obsolete. It will suck out the monetary premium from gold, bonds, equities, real estate and eventually Bitcoin.

It may be difficult to see the value of reducing friction caused by trust and/or permission. These are often things we do not think about because they carry hidden costs. Let’s look at how the traditional banking system is affected by trust and permission. First a banking institution must be given permission to operate by the government. Then, customers must trust the institution and the system as a whole before they desire to open an account. The bank needs to give each individual permission to open the account upon request. Customers must trust the bank management will operate in a manner that does not jeopardize the balance under custody. They must trust that the bank (and consequently the ruling governmental authority) will give them prompt access to their balance while preventing bad actors from accessing private information and/or charging their account without permission. This means that every transaction must be permitted by the bank and the Government. Finally, individuals must also trust that the authorities will administer fiscal and monetary policies effectively to ensure fiat money’s status as legal tender and that it retains purchasing power. Each individual step adds real costs and operational risks to traditional monetary and financial systems. They are manifested through a multitude of fees, the risk of temporarily/permanently loss of access to balances and the continued devaluation of money through inflationary forces. The inefficiencies of these systems are also reflected directly in the cost of goods and services (payment processors charge vendors, and that cost is transferred to consumers via higher prices).

Bellow is a list of a few other ways that modern society is enduring costs associated with systems that are overly reliant on trust, permission and a lack of transparency:

  • Our reliance on communication and social platforms that can arbitrarily dictate who is given permission to use them (Twitter, YouTube, Facebook, Google, etc). We are also entrusting these corporations with our personal data, which can potentially be used/shared without our permission.
  • The annual cost of counterfeit products sold on the internet is estimated between $300-600 billions. The total annual cost of counterfeit products is estimated to be approaching $2 trillions. Many of these products are channeled through trusted vendors, and the consumers are unaware they are purchasing counterfeits.
  • Financial service providers can arbitrarily choose who/when gets access to their services in order to favor their own interests. This has been manifested by the notorious stonewalling that traditional banks have enacted against cryptocurrency assets, and more recently by the Robinhood-Gamestop scandal.
  • The lack of trust in the validity of our electoral process (at least by part of the USA population) has caused social resentment and political instability. Other countries have allegedly violated public trust and produced fraudulent election results.

What is Ether?

Ethereum (the network) is not trying to be money, but it utilizes ether exclusively for its monetary properties and not because it can be magically burned by an imaginary engine of sorts. It costs money to participate in the network as a miner, and their engagement is financially incentivized with ether. Any activity in the Ethereum network requires the use of block space. Block space is a scarce resource, therefore participants who wish to transact must use ether to bid for it. These interactions are utilizing ether as a monetary medium of exchange. In the long run, as the price of ether goes up, the ether denomination of gas prices goes down. That happens because no one is using ether as gas/oil, and it is actually being used as money. In the short run you may see the opposite occurring because of the dynamic between the portion of block space demand that is inelastic and the increased demand for ether and block space that move in tandem during market cycles.

Why are so many people insisting ether is like oil, but not money? The crypto space has a few analogies that have been used to describe technical/economic mechanisms that are somewhat tricky to understand: mining, Ethereum's gas, and the infamous analogy between ether and oil. Crypto "mining" is not like real world mining. It's purpose is not to extract resources, but it is rather a decentralized mechanism to process transactions. Newly minted BTC tokens are not "mined", they are minted by the protocol and awarded to operators. Furthermore, it is impossible to change the total mining output of the network... adding/removing miners does not affect the mining output. If you are new to crypto, you can read a more detailed explanation of mining here. ETH's "gas" is not like fuel (it cannot even be stored). It is just a computational metric that is more akin to the distance a car must travel, but not what actually makes it move. The fuel is electricity and it must be paid for with ether. When you transact you are also paying for the "car" which is the use of all active mining hardware/validators for a fraction of a second. And ether is just money.

To better illustrate why ether is not like oil let’s imagine I have a car with a 14-gallon fuel tank and I want to take it on a road trip. The car is not aware of the price of gasoline, and it would not travel any farther if the price of gas would double the next day. That’s because the intrinsic utility of oil has nothing to do with its monetary value. The car needs gas because of its particular physical properties and how the internal combustion engine is designed to utilize it. If I want to drive from point A to point B and it takes a full tank to get there, it will take that full tank no matter what happens to the monetary properties of gas/oil. This is fundamentally different from how Ethereum uses ether.

It is always better to understand the principles of cryptoeconomics than to rely on analogies. If you put too much weight on these simplified analogies, you will not understand the economic actuality behind them. This is a source confusion in the crypto space, and it is used to support false narratives. From an economic perspective, ether is money. Once you understand this, you will know that the narrative that Bitcoin and Ethereum are not competing because they are different things is analogous to saying fax machines do not compete with the internet.

It is important to stress that ether is a natively defined asset, and as such, counterparty risk is eliminated. This is not the case with wrapped Bitcoins and other tokens that are based on assets that require the involvement of a custodian (like tokenized US dollars). This, along with the fact that users need ether to engage in any activity in the Ethereum network (transactions fees can only be paid with ether), makes ether a natural choice to be used as a monetary asset. However, the beautiful thing about ether is that it is actually not "just money". It is a mixture of a scarce monetized commodity, money, bond and growth tech stock.

  • Monetized Commodity: Ether is becoming more scarce and will continue to do so with the transition to Proof of Stake (PoS) and EIP-1559. Ethereum does not have a supply cap, but it does have a roadmap for a sustainable security model and if it achieves a positive cashflow then it will not only eliminate issuance, it can become deflationary. An argument can be made about potential issues with Bitcoin's sustainability in the long run.
  • Currency: Ether is used as a unit of account and medium of exchange to pay for every activity in Ethereum. It is also used in the same way for venture capital related to ICOs, and for digital art commercialized via NFTs. Ether is also used as collateral in the DeFi space and new monetary uses will continue to emerge. It is an immature form of digital money, just like Bitcoin is an immature form of digital gold. Some people prefer to say that ether is just a utility token. However, a utility token is just a narrowly scoped form of money. Not only is ether's scope within its digital economy growing, by next year users will be able to pay millions of merchants with ether through Paypal and Visa. We have never seen the adoption of a new form of money grow organically. New forms of money have always been imposed by authorities. What would the organic growth of money look like? It would look like ether.
  • Ethereum's digital economy: Ethereum has limitless use cases and it is already generating economic activity with real world usefulness. Ether's value will benefit from acting as the native monetary asset for Ethereum. As Ethereum's economic activity grows, the velocity and/or value of ether must also increase.
  • Bond: With Proof of Stake you need to lock up ether to receive a yield in return. It is similar to how bonds work.
  • Growth Tech Stock: Ethereum is essentially operating as a cloud based service provider, and the network will be entirely operated by stakers who happen to be the recipients of transaction fees. Ethereum provides a service - that service is paid with ether. The network is controlled by holding ether that is staked. The more valuable the service provided by Ethereum becomes, the more users will be willing to pay for transactions and the more valuable the protocol and the ether token become. It is not exactly the same as holding a stock, but there are a lot of parallels.
  • Full reserve banking model: This is a bit of a stretch, but it is a potential end-game for Ethereum. It can serve as the base infrastructure and reserve asset for a full reserve banking system. In a nutshell: a consortium of banking companies can be formed to standardize a framework to hold and stake ether under custody in exchange for wrapped Ether (wETH). Customers deposit ether, banks exchange it for wETH, and stake the original ether. Resting balances of wETH on customer accounts can receive a cut of the staking rewards. Banks get their profit model, customers get to spend wETH with traditional banking services and potentially receive a share of the staking yield. Customers could also have access to a yield curve based on variable reserve requirements. This would allow banks to create money (which is actually good for the economy when it is done with moderation), but for the first time ever customers would have the choice of how much risk exposure they are comfortable with. This dynamic could help to establish a form of democratic check and balances system that discourages moral hazard. Ether could become a godsend to banks in the land of negative yields. It's a pipe dream, but not entirely impossible. Don't forget that the US OCC has essentially given banks the green light to take the first steps in this direction (US banks have been approved to use the Ethereum blockchain for their operations AND they can become validators... yup this happened).

Understanding Cryptocurrency Scarcity

Anyone who is insisting cryptocurrencies are not scarce does not understand how the concept of scarcity works in this asset class. The value of a cryptocurrency is derived from a combination of the code, computers, people and amount of money that is participating in the network. It is the fusion of all these elements that defines scarcity and the impact it has on each unique cryptocurrency.

I am going to use Bitcoin as an example, but the following concepts apply to all other cryptocurrencies. Computers are used to establish the security of the Bitcoin protocol, and it can be broken down in two distinct categories: the number of distinct nodes, and the mining computational power (known as the network’s hashrate). Nodes are like messengers that send requests from users to operators and retrieve information back to the users. Nodes do not process transactions, but they ensure the communication between users and operators is undisrupted. It does not cost much money to operate a node, but it is important that nodes exist in large numbers that are independently operated. This is what protects the network from attackers trying to take it offline.

Operators are the computers responsible for processing transactions, except they are actually called “miners”. Bitcoin uses a clever combination of cryptography, economics and networking to establish a resource intensive mechanism that allows transactions to be processed in a decentralized way while providing financial incentives to participants. Long story short: it is expensive to operate as a miner (miners spend several million dollars every day to participate in the operation of the Bitcoin network). They do it because they are paid by the network with a combination of transaction fees paid by users and newly minted bitcoins created by the protocol. This is what prevents transactions from being reverted and/or censored. At the time of this writing the Bitcoin network has over 10,000 individual nodes, and a total mining computational power that consumes the equivalent of $22 million worth of electricity per day (using the US average electricity cost of 13.19 cents per kilowatt hour).

When a person buys a bitcoin for the first time, he/she becomes a new member of the network as a participant who can now send and receive bitcoins. What is perhaps even more important, many participants extend their support for the network into the real world by advocating for its value proposition; participating in the Bitcoin network is also a social phenomenon.

Finally, the demand for Bitcoin has an indirect impact in the security capabilities of the network. Miners are partially financed by the issuance of new tokens, which happens at a fixed rate denominated in bitcoins. This means that the higher the price of bitcoin is, the higher the financial remuneration for miners will be. Ultimately this attracts more miners to the network and results in greater protection against the reversal and/or censorship of transactions.

Anyone could copy the Bitcoin code, make slight changes to it and deploy a new crypto called “FunkyDonkeyCoin”. It would be a worthless network with a single participant, secured by nearly zero computational power. There is only one reason why anyone would possibly want to buy a donkey token: for the comedic/meme value of having something called FunkyDonkeyCoin because it sounds funny and it uses a picture of a silly looking cross-eyed donkey as its symbol. “Dogecoin” is a real life dog-themed version of FunkyDonkeyCoin. It was created as a joke, but it has surprisingly gained popularity over time and it has reached over $7 billion market capitalization. Most pundits agree that this valuation is not sustainable, but it still speaks volumes about the impact of network effect on cryptocurrencies. The bottom line is that the Bitcoin code can be copied, but the network of computers, people and market valuation cannot.

Bitcoin vs Ethereum Monetary Policies

One of the aspects central to Bitcoin’s value proposition is its immutable monetary policy, and the determination of a maximum supply cap of 21 million bitcoins. However, the idea that Bitcoin's monetary policy cannot be changed is a myth. It is a false narrative that takes for granted that the issuance subsidy will no longer be necessary at some point, but there is no way to objectively assert this. There is no divine power preventing the monetary policy from being changed. If the security model for Bitcoin was jeopardized because of insufficient cash flow to miners, then Bitcoin's monetary policy would be the first thing on the chopping board to go in order to remedy the situation.

Bitcoin’s monetary policy has been proven to work very effectively under specific circumstances. Since its inception, the price of Bitcoin has increased exponentially, and up until recently, there was a lack of alternative payment rails that were capable of transacting with bitcoin. Most importantly, Bitcoin has been generally perceived as the strongest (arguably the only institutional grade) store of value asset in the cryptocurrency market. These dynamics are changing and the sustainability of Bitcoin’s monetary policy is entering uncharted territory. Sooner or later the price of Bitcoin will no longer double (or more) every four years. When this happens, the issuance subsidy will be effectively reduced on each halving event. Transaction fees will have to fill the gap left by the reduction of issuance, but the incentive to use the Bitcoin network is being reduced by the introduction of so many alternatives systems (wrapped bitcoins on Ethereum, PayPal, Visa, Mastercard, commercial banks and even tech giants like Apple and Google are likely to join the custodial and payment rail crypto party). To make matters worse, Ethereum is starting to be recognized as an institutional grade store of value asset. It is a mistake to assume these changes will be inconsequential to Bitcoin’s security model.

The criticism against Ethereum’s dynamic monetary policy and ETH 2.0’s proposed perpetual 1% issuance may seem strong on the surface level, but they crumble once all the pieces of the cryptoeconomic puzzle are put together. For starters, if an argument can be made that the financial incentives to operators (miners/stakers) are excessive or insufficient then an argument can be made for the implementation and execution of a dynamic monetary policy. Additionally, I can’t see how an arbitrarily picked issuance schedule determined during the genesis of a new highly complex system is likely to be efficient through its lifecycle. Bitcoin's monetary policy provides the certainty of stability and protection from abuse, but it sacrifices the possibility of efficiency and jeopardizes longevity. It would be like if a captain of a ship pointed it in the direction of its final destination, set the throttle, then fell back to his cabin for a nice bottle of chianti and hoped that the ship would arrive safely. There would be no one at the helm to navigate the seas, no one to make sure it stayed on route, no one to avoid the storms or to take advantage of currents. In my opinion it is a pretty bad approach to something as critical as monetary policy.

With respect to how Ethereum is administering its dynamic monetary policy: I don't see any evidence to suggest developers have been enriching their pockets by keeping issuance at current levels. Developers are stakeholders and the Ethereum Foundation holds a lot of ether - debasing ether is against their self interest. There is a great misunderstanding that the ones who are adjusting issuance are the recipients of the new tokens or that they are somehow colluding with miners. Is there any documented case of this happening?

Ultimately, the 1-2% nominal issuance rate of ETH 2.0 must be interpreted as a maximum issuance level; the actual issuance is anticipated to be near zero or potentially negative thanks to EIP-1559, multiple scaling solutions and high demand for Ethereum’s block space. In the worst case scenario, ETH 2.0 will have a 1-2% issuance rate while providing 2-3% staking yield to long term holders via staking. The market is still skeptical these changes will be executed successfully and/or that they will provide an equivalent level of security to PoW. However, as we approach the full realization of new features, it will become self evident that Ethereum is a superior store of value when compared to any other asset (including Bitcoin).

Ethereum’s Bull Market Catalysts

  1. Wide adoption of Layer 2 solutions: these will amplify the base layer block space value while encouraging further network adoption by a significant reduction of fees. A successful integration with DeFi protocols will dismiss the "Ethereum killers" theory and consolidate market confidence.
  2. EIP-1559: this enhancement involves a new methodology to determine base transaction fees, along with flexible block sizes and transaction fee burning (partial destruction of transaction fees). It will improve security and user experience by stabilizing transaction fees, as well as introduce a deflationary mechanism to ether.
  3. Sharding: scale Layer 1 bandwidth, compounding the effect of Layer 2 solutions, further consolidating Ethereum's dominance in the DeFi space, making it feasible to introduce new use cases and eventually increase transaction fee revenue.
  4. The switch from PoW to PoS: discontinuing Proof of Work (PoW) will eliminate the operating costs related to mining and will allow for a reduction of issuance (~4% will be reduced to ~1%). Money that was previously allocated to buying mining equipment will be redirected to the acquisition of ether. Staking ether will remove it from circulation for extended periods of time. Operating cost will be negligible, allowing validators to withhold most of the ether revenue. This will be the greatest bull market catalyst in the history of cryptocurrencies and it will eclipse the effect of Bitcoin’s halvings.

Bitcoin maximalists will be naysaying all the way through and past a market cap flip. Do not get caught up in their narrative. If you are not sure, then it is better to rebalance your portfolio proportionally to market caps. This is a smart risk mitigation strategy that has a huge upside. If none of these enhancements are successfully deployed and Ethereum turns out to be a failure, then you would only have reduced your gains by 20-30%. Otherwise, ETH will be making you mountains of money.

Continuation...


Had AP body double conscious while awake

Some people have experiences of APing while awake and I started out like this. I wanted to learn what was happening to me, and the best way to practice APing on purpose.

So I can AP while awake and I AP while meditating. When I AP while awake, I have the body visceral movements and can get information through feelings.

Last night was totally different though. I was laying down and kept APing, so I decided to ground myself. It only stopped it temporarily. It doesn't really bother me when it happens anymore, because I understand what's happening now. And I actually try to take advantage of it sometimes and try to AP while meditating with my eyes closed.

So I started out with the goal of remote viewing, but I got interrupted because my bf had rolled over and woke up. He changed the channel on the TV and I started talking to him.

He got me some food and laid back down. After I ate, I was still awake and conscious... however I started APing again. While I was having a conversation with him, I was completely aware of me traveling back in the past to his younger self...all while he's exaplaining the backstory of a Chicago PD tv episode in the present time.

So this is what happened:

I traveled back and needed to tell him things to consider, so that his future self would be ok. I went back to when he was 22 years old.

When he saw me, there was an immediate energetic recognition that he could not explain, but was very drawn to me. It's almost like he locked on to the frequency of my souls signature and recognized it.

So I explained to him that I am from his future and that time of the future, he is 44 years old and when we meet in the future, I'm 10 years younger than him. I also told him that I too, have a self that is present in this time, but I'm 12 and living in California.

I could see that he loved me in his eyes and warned him to not view me in this way because I am not here to be a crush. I told him I know about his girlfriends so don't feel guilty about it, because we won't be kissing or anything of that nature. I told him that his future self tells me his life and his stories.

My bf younger self then asked me in the future, does he love me. I said yes, sooooooooo much, in a joking smoochy type of way lol. So then I heard voices from people in his life that were affecting him. They came in sound wave spirals towards me. I didn't tell him what was affecting him or who- but I did tell him that just like I won't interfere with his romantic life and girlfriends, I won't interfere to stop these negative influences because they are his experiences and he has to live through them . I told him, a specific situation is not pleasant but you are going to make it worse by how you deal with it. So don't do what you've been doing. What you do now will affect you in the time I come from.

My 22 yr old bf listened and tried to get me to tell him different outcomes about the future, but I wouldn't tell him. When I saw his face look a bit disappointed, I told him if he ever heard the word "Bitcoin" to buy some. He said ok.

So then him and I walked to the area where my house would be built in the future. I pointed at the trees and showed him this is our home, but it's not built yet, it's all trees and forrest.

I started telling him again that he has to change his ways. That in the big scheme of things, these issues blend together and are going to happen anyways- so why make unpleasant things....worse? (At this time there was a third layer of consciousness that was higher than my AP double and I saw an even bigger picture of how things and events were interwoven- like fast flashing of times, but it wasn't meant for me to tell him this, and I don't think I could explain it even if I tried).

I also told him to promise not to tell anyone in his time that I came.

So...yea, it is different than my regular awake AP's - because of me remembering and getting the information as it was happening in the astral world, while being fully awake, conscious, and in a conversation in the physical world.

I think I had a fully conscious AP with full memory.

Has anyone else experienced this?


Crypto

Bitcoin bubble, cryptocurrency cheat, blockchain ... pyramid?

Fortunately, such words are heard less and less, the money of the future and blockchain technologies regularly enter the information field and stop sounding scary.

On October 21-22, Moscow hosted the largest offline event in the blockchain industry - the Blockchain Life 2020 forum. The platform gathered over 3000 participants, both industry professionals and market newcomers.

One of the key speakers, the head of the State Duma Committee on Finance, Anatoly Aksakov, predicted the start of testing the digital ruble and stressed that it is important to develop blockchain technology.

Particular attention was paid to the section on blockchain implementation, where they demonstrated real cases of using the technology in their business such companies as: Sberbank, S7 TechLab, Waves Enterprise, DIT Moscow, Bitfury, IC SIBINTEK LLC.

People are already using blockchain technology to buy and sell all kinds of objects, car leasing, medical services, messaging applications, there are many examples in practice. Such blockchain solutions significantly contribute to improving efficiency, security and positively affect the speed of business operations.

How your environment refers to the crypto-sphere?

#blockchain #crypto #yllo #messenger #fintech

https://preview.redd.it/4k0nmcbwo4i61.jpg?width=706&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=a3cfb904fb154407d2291c9c6d8b792893e2fcbf


This aged well: Woman divorces husband for reading r/Bitcoin (aka cult of clueless idiots) and HODLing too much BTC... in 2014. Get ready to laugh.. extremely entertaining read.

I remember reading an old r/relationships post about a woman who was furious at her husband for his "cult like" belief in bitcoin and mocked him for thinking he was "in a the ground floor". She goes off on a diatribe and mocks him every chance he gets for his "foolish" beliefs and how he spends his money on buying and holding bitcoin... she consider any bitcoin that he holds to be "lost money".

I actually saved this when I read it back years ago to see one day how it would age... man talk about the worlds biggest I told you so. She had zero faith and respect in her husband. I hope he has a garage full of lambos in his giant mansion.

Here are some of the highlights snipped for your own entertainment:

-------

"My husband (I'll call him John for the sake of anonymity) and I have been married for a little over 5 years now and everything has been going well up until a year or so ago. We were planning on having children and everything. Now my life feels like it is at a complete stand still."

Skip to 2013...

" We are both avid redditors so when we find a new subreddit that we love we get excited and start sending each other links to see if we can get the other one interested He finds out about bitcoin and is sending me links constantly about it. (r/bitcoin) It goes from "check out this cool technology" to absolute cultish behavior in a very brief period. I would say 0-100 in probably 2 months. He starts taking every dime we have and buying them as quickly as he can. He actually set up a feature that BUYS MORE ON A WEEKLY BASIS after our paychecks come through. The worst part is he didn't even TELL ME he did this. He gave me this arrogant response about doing what's best for us and our future kids.

Overall, and I'm not exaggerating, I would say we have lost over $22,000. I kept telling him to sell as the price was rising and he promised me a big year in 2014. The price kept falling and he CONTINUED TO BUY MORE. He makes more money than I do but we are building a future together and we have a shared bank account. He kept telling me this was for our kids college fund, to buy a house, etc. The money...I can get over as people spend money on other stupid crap like boats they will never use but this isn't even the beginning to the absolute craziness I will see out of him over the coming year.

My husband starts bringing up fucking bitcoin at these events. MY events for MY job. People here have a lot of money and he knows this. He saw this as some kind of opportunity. He goes on and on about how taxes are theft and bitcoin is a way out. The dollar is about to collapse, banks are destroying the world, etc. You are supposed to make light hearted jokes about how their football team is doing, not get into these political discussions. He knows this too since he's been coming to these events with me for years.

It starts off small where I laugh it off and say "ohhhh John, he's into technology and gets a little too excited". He saw this as condescension. The car rides home? Full on fights about how I don't get it and I'm going to be left behind. I felt like I was fighting with some type of evangelical Christian (I have been in plenty of these growing up). He ironically rips into religion any chance he gets but he is absolutely part of a cult full of insane people.

Keep in mind as this goes on he is still buying more as the price goes down telling me we have a great opportunity on our hands. He ignores long term trends and focuses on these specific time frames to show me how stupid I am. Yes, my husband called me STUPID over THINKING I do not understand it.

I feel like I have read more about bitcoin than he has because he won't discuss any downsides with me. He tells me all problems will be fixed and we are in on the ground floor. He seems to be in a constant good news bubble about this when no one actually cares. Most of the responses he gets from people in public are feigned interest until they can get away from him or they just tell him they don't care if the converstaion lasts more than 2 minutes. I am embarrassed to be around him.

After a recent price crash, he actually bought more using our vacation fund that I have been saving away for AND planning. All gone, in bitcoin never to be seen again.

I am sorry for the long rant but this is my life now. I have tried everything. I have tried reasoning with him. I have tried explaining to him that he should not have sole control over our money. He is so confident that he slyly brings up selling one of our cars to buy more. He didn't come right out and say what it was for but I can guarantee you it was to buy more. He is ruining my job and robbing me of happiness.

I used to consider him a smart guy and I never, ever thought he would succomb to basically being brainwashed by a bunch of clueless idiots on the internet who seem to know absolutely nothing about finance or the real world (r/bitcoin). I don't know how familiar people are here with bitcoin but if you go to their subreddit, you will see exactly what I'm talking about. I started crying once reading my husband's comments worded slightly differently, repeated 100 times over. It was like I married a parrot.

What do I DO? I am not religious in any way but my family most certainly is. I feel like I couldn't even bring up divorce and I want to save my husband. I want him back to the way he was. It seems like he is addicted to a drug but since he doesn't realize it, everyone else is wrong. I don't know if I should have an intervention or just walk away and hope he comes to his senses when I'm staying in a hotel for a few weeks.

Again, I apologize for the length but I want you to feel the way I feel so you can understand the advice you are giving. I really need help here. Thank you to anyone who even reads half of this!

-----

Everyone told her to divorce him... here is the most downvoted comment with -66 downvotes:

[–]YRuafraid-66 points6 years ago

Man I am so glad I'm not married. You're gonna want your husband when those bitcoins are worth fortunes.... hopefully HE's gonna divorce you before that because you don't deserve any of it.

To your husband I say... keep holding those coins brother.


Does it realy matter when to BUY BITCOIN ?

Hey im new at cryptocurrency, but im wondering:
Recent events have shown that bitcoin is probably only going up, despite small dips here and there.

I have not yet bought any bitcoin, but im going to use bitcoin like a saving account, im not trying to get short term gains.

So in my case, i think it does not realy matter WHEN i do buy bitcoin. Now when price is 50k or in extreme case when its 100k.

Ofcourse im going to buy it as fast as possible, but just for example here. Because as far as i know bitcoin rise wont stop even to that 100k, and im pretty sure many of you do agree with me right :) ?

Because at end of the day its only matter of % that bitcoin is going UP, not so much does the price rise from 50k to 60k, but the % matter most, when im invested in it, right ?


Account Under Review Lock - Solved in 9 days.

Hi all,

I wanted to put a quick post up to describe the events of the last ~week and what I did to get my account that was under review unlocked after 9 days.

For some context, last week I created a new Coinbase account for the first time and submitted my passport for identity verification. I am a U.K. citizen living and working permanently in Norway. Once the account verification was complete (level 2, full access to buying, selling and exchanging Crypto on coinbase), I moved a decent amount of Bitcoin to Coinbase. When the funds arrived my account was placed under review and I was unable to access anything.

I came to this subreddit and to my horror discovered many people were in the same boat - some having been locked out for many weeks or months. Here are the events of the last 9 days that have culminated with me being granted access to my funds again:

9 days ago, Monday, Feb 8

My account is "locked" immediately after Coinbase receives my Bitcoin without any rhyme or reason. I submit a support request via the contact form on the Coinbase website and ask for a reason as to why my account has been locked and asking that it be unlocked so that I may freely access my funds. I recieve a confirmation of a case being opened via email and follow this up with a post on this subreddit, replying to the bot with my case number.

8 days ago, Tuesday, Feb 9

I send out a public Tweet and I tag @Coinbase asking them for an update to my situation. I then message Coinbase directly on Twitter, linking my tweet in the message and tell them I am in desperate need of a resolution to my case. I include my case number in the tweet.

Roughly 2 hours after this tweet is sent out I recieve a follow up email from Coinbase support that states:

Hi redacted,

Thank you for following up with us.

Our team has received a high number of account review requests. However, we've asked them to expedite their review of your account, and will get to your inquiry as soon as possible.

We appreciate your patience and understanding.  

Regards,Coinbase Support

I reply thanking them for getting back to me and asking that they please keep me up to date as soon as possible.

I decide at this point that since I have at least recieved a response, I should give them some time to do what they need to do. I decide to wait a week before attempting to contact them again.

Now, Wednesday, Feb 17

Having reached my limit and feeling the pressure of not having access to a large sum of money locked up in a highly volatile crypto currency, I decide it's time to escalate to an official complaint. I pull up Section 10 of the Coinbase User Agreement on one screen, and the Coinbase official complaint form on another. I read every line of Section 10 of the agreement to ensure I understand the wording of this agreement so that my complaint contains exactly what Coinbase expects.

In particular, I take not of the fact that you must:

  1. Set out the cause of the complaint.
  2. How you would like Coinbase to resolve the complaint.
  3. Any other information I believe to be relevant.

I then carefully formatted my complaint so that it met all of these criteria. It may help others, so here is the exact complaint I sent coinbase, with all sensitive information removed:

Name: redacted

Email address: redacted

Address: redacted

Existing case number: #04562597

I have contacted your support team seeking a resolution to my case (#04562597) but have been unable to find a solution within a timely manner. I am now following through with the escalated complaint process as outlined in Section 10.2 of the Coinbase user agreement by using the Coinbase complaint form to set out the cause of my complaint and how I would like you to resolve this complaint.The causes of my complaint is as follows:

a) I have been unjustly blocked from accessing my own Bitcoin for an extensive amount of time without any reason beyond the account needing additional verification. This process is taking too long and your social media accounts show many people have been stuck in a similar process for weeks/months.b) I have been unable to regain access to my funds in a timely manner due to long wait times negligence from Coinbase support.

I would like Coinbase to resolve this complaint by either:

a) Coinbase must complete the process of “reviewing my account” in a timely manner so that I may freely access the redacted total BTC in my Coinbase account.

- or -

b) Coinbase must return my assets to me by transferring the redacted total BTC to the same wallet that the coins were sent from. The receiving address for that wallet is: redacted address.

Thank you

Several hours later I received an email stating my account has been verified. 5 minutes later I had safely transfered my Bitcoin out of Coinbase.

I hope this helps.


IC3 Webinar: Attacks on Bitcoin and the Lightning Network

The Initiative for Cryptocurrencies and Contracts (IC3) will be hosting a webinar on February 26th, come learn about Attacks on Bitcoin and the Lightning Network. As both Bitcoin and the Lightning Network have seen an increase in use, volume, and price, we must consider: how secure are they really?

Link to register for this event below.

About IC3:

The Initiative for Cryptocurrencies and Contracts (IC3) is a blockchain research initiative of faculty members at Carnegie Mellon University, Cornell University, Cornell Tech, EPFL, ETH Zurich, UC Berkeley, University College London, UIUC, and the Technion.

Learn more about IC3 blockchain research and these talks on our website: https://initc3.org

Register to attend this Webinar: https://cornell.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_n0noax7NSKWph4EBtiXUyA


IC3 Webinar: Attacks on Bitcoin and the Lightning Networks

The Initiative for Cryptocurrencies and Contracts (IC3) will be hosting a webinar on February 26th, come learn about Attacks on Bitcoin and the Lightning Network. As both Bitcoin and the Lightning Network have seen an increase in use, volume, and price, we must consider: how secure are they really?

Link to register for this event in post details.

About IC3:

The Initiative for Cryptocurrencies and Contracts (IC3) is a blockchain research initiative of faculty members at Carnegie Mellon University, Cornell University, Cornell Tech, EPFL, ETH Zurich, UC Berkeley, University College London, UIUC, and the Technion.

Learn more about IC3 blockchain research and these talks on our website: https://initc3.org

Register to attend this Webinar: https://cornell.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_n0noax7NSKWph4EBtiXUyA


[ Bitcoin ] Discussing relevant support and resistance for #Bitcoin, #Ethereum & $DXY. Key formations & Fib levels. The MicroStrategy news is a sell event, but very bullish long term. $50,000 is very big...

[ 🔴 DELETED 🔴 ] Topic originally posted in Bitcoin by cryptoMegaXBT [link]


/u/cryptoMegaXBT your post has been copied because one or more comments in this topic have been removed. This copy will preserve unmoderated topic. If you would like to opt-out, please send a message using [this link].


Avoiding Government Confiscation -- KYC Bitcoin Sent Through Samourai Whirlpool?

A couple years ago, I bought some Bitcoin on Coinsquare, an exchange based in Canada with KYC requirements.

I'm probably being paranoid, but I'm worried about the potential for governments to demand citizens turn in their BTC.

I'm trying to figure out the best way to either

  1. obfuscate what happened with the Bitcoin or
  2. otherwise turn my KYC coins into non-KYC coins.

Would it be sufficient to pull my coins off the exchange, onto Samourai Wallet and run it through Whirlpool? I don't think so, since in the event of a confiscation 6102 type event, they would probably have all the data from exchanges and demand proof or a paper trail of what you did with the coins. Open to any other ideas on how to avoid this.

To be clear, I'm not trying to evade taxes. If I ever sell my Bitcoin (ya right), I will pay whatever capital gains taxes I need to at that time. I just want to minimize the threat of having to turn them in one day.

Thankfully, since learning more about Bitcoin, I started buying with cash through ATMs without any ID verification, and storing them on a hardware wallet with unique addresses for each time I add to my balance.


The bullish case for GET protocol

Eventhough the price has been stagnant for years, the real usage of GET has only increased. I believe it's only a matter of time before GET protocol is picked up by the crypto space.

But worst case scenario - it doesn't - the buybacks will still push the price up on their own. Here's why:

In 2020 ticketing volume in general was down like 90-99% due to corona. Yet GET managed to sell over 236k tickets. Or an increase of 27% compared to 2019.

2019 vs 2020 tickets sales & GET burned

How is this possible?

It's possibly because ticketeers recognize the advantages of smart tickets. Once big events are a thing again (hopefuly this year) scalping will become important again (which GET elminates) but for 2020 the main selling point was:

- Crowd control

- Interaction with the ticket holders

- Paperless tickets scanning & payment

- ...

This means that GET has conquered a lot of marketshare from traditional ticketeers. Well mainly GUTS actually but the advantages GUTS brings, other ticketeers using GET will have too.

Looking ahead

If GUTS was able to sell 236k tickets in a year where ticketing volume is down at least 90% then I think it's safe to assume that they'll sell over 3 million tickets once everything is allowed again (2022 most likely).

Add the new ticketing companies that integrated GET recently (getticket in Korea, Wicket Events in Italy and Tectix in Germany) and you'll understand that we'll be seeing millions of tickets processed by the GET protocol.

With the whitelabel added (every ticketing company can start using GET protocol very quickly and easely now) many more ticketeers will join.

Tokenomics & usage to push the price

The GET tokenomics are built so that for every ticket issued 0,28€ (or 0,34$) worth of GET is needed by the ticketeers. They buy most of this from exchanges and a minority they get subsidized from the User Grotwh Fund. In 2020 around 70% was bought directly from exchanges.

I'm willing to bet that we'll see at least 5 million tickets in 2022:

5 million * 0,28 * 0,7 = €980.000 in buybacks or around 1,2 million $

You can imagine what buybacks of 100k $ each month will do to such a smallcap, especialy considering that all this bought GET is burned after usage.

If the price would remain stable we'd see 5 million GET burned, or 25% of the entire supply (SF of 13 million will be burned soon anyway as it isn't used so I don't consider that as supply).

Of course the price will not remain stable as with such an increase in buybacks & burns, GET will be recognised as truely deflationary through real world usage.

As of this month all tickets issued by the GET protocol will become NFT's

Over 60.000 sold tickets (that haven't ben scanned yet for the event) will be minted as NFT's this month. This means that tickets, after scanning can become collectables. But so much more:

Here's my take on why GET protocol's smart and blockchain registered tickets becoming NFT's will revolutionize the ticketing industry.

After the DeFi hype we’ve witnessed last year, the next hype in crypto that seems to be developing are NFT’s. In this case it isn’t about riding the hype. Tickets being NFT’s on the blockchain really makes sense and it will change ticketing as we know it. Let me explain…

So what’s a NFT exactly? NFT stands for non fungible token. This is a token that’s unique on the blockchain and not mutually interchangeable. This in contrast to for example Bitcoin where it doesn’t matter which Bitcoin you have (1 BTC = 1 BTC). Every ticket issued by the GET protocol will become a getNFT.

Image explaining GET NFT's

getNFTs are indivisible, meaning that a getNFT can only be held by 1 address at the same time. This ensures that whoever owns a certain NFT will be the only one to decrypt the QR code.

Eventhough GET’s NFT’s will be the most used, bought & traded NFT’s in the crypto space the goal isn’t to ride the hype. Ticketing + NFT = a match made in heaven. And here’s why:

As every ticket on the blockchain will become a NFT and thus unqiue, it will allow non custodial ownership of the ticket asset. This gives many interesting advantages but 2 stand out for me personally: P2P ticket trading & DeFi event financing.

P2P ticket tradingNFT’s will allow P2P ticket trading and GET’s almost done building it! Peer to peer ticket trading means that everyone who owns a getNFT ticket will be able to trade it with another “peer”. This will happen in a closed and regulated ecosystem. This means that certain rules can be set by the event organizer. For example:

  • The ticket can be sold for only x% profit
  • x% of the trade profit goes to the event organizer
  • a certain trading fee goes to the event organizer

This will be the first and only ticketing system that will allow ticket trading while at the same time making scalping impossible. Regulators have been struggling for a long time to solve this problem and what seemed impossible to achieve will be made possible by smart contracts! The impact of this will be huge and will change the ticketing space for the better.Additionally and not unimportantly it will give the event organizer an extra revenue stream. The money that right now for a large part goes to scalpers (the secondary ticket market is worth $15B) will be tapped into by the event organizers.

Why this is important

The advantage for GET holders is twofold:

  1. The P2P market will atract more users (artists, venues, ticketing companies) of the GET protocol (= more GET needed in the primary market)
  2. every ticket exchanged in the secondary market is an additional statechange (= more GET needed)

Event financingWithout a doubt one of the most promising and exciting things to look forward to in 2021 is the introduction of decentralized event financing to GET Protocol.Event organizers often struggle to get financing for their events. This doesn’t only apply to starting artists, but even to famous stars. The artists need to have a lot of capital in advance as they have to pay for the venues, organisation, … upfront while only receiving the money after the show is over. Enter GET’s DeFi solution!

The pre-financing of events for event-organizers is not a solution looking for a problem; it’s a widely known and used tool that enables event organizers to make the investments needed to get their shows or festivals off the ground.In the past we have encountered Event Organizers who select their ticketing partner solely based on the amount of money and loan conditions that they are offered up front.

Thanks to getNFT tickets you’ll be able to pre-finance events of your choice. You can choose to finance new artists (more risk/more APY) or established kpop stars (less risk/less APY).

This is how it will work:

The technical side of event financing

If the concept seems complicated, here’s what you need to understand about GET’s decentralized financing solution:1.) Event organizers will be able to easily pre-finance their events. (Something they desperately crave.)2.) Investors will be able to invest in events of their choice, at a risk & reward level that they feel comfortable with.3.) The $GET token is an integral part of the financing process, as it is required for ‘skin in the game’ from

The advantage event financing for GET token holders will bring is again twofold:

  1. As a GET holder you’ll be able to finance events and share in the profit of the ticket sales. This means that GET will allow you to profit without selling = passive income. An important note is that this is profit without inflation. While other DeFi projects give you returns by increasing the supply (and thus decreasing the value of the token) the returns here will not increase the GET supply, as the returns come from real profit(ticket sales).
  2. As the GET token will be an integral part of this process, it will:- increase the buy pressure of the GET token (everyone who wants to participate will need GET)- decrease the supply (everyone who participates will have to locks his GET tokens).

For a deeper insight I recommend the blog below:

https://medium.com/get-protocol/decentralizing-event-financing-liquidity-x-defi-x-nfts-975f028135f5


Can VIH / Bakkt realistically reach $300 like Phunware (STLR / PHUN)?

The all-time high for QuantumScape was $131.67.

Despite this, no event SPAC / blockbuster SPAC has been able to match the extraordinary performance of the ex-SPAC Phunware. Within a month after the ticker change, PHUN reached an all-time high of $308.40.

https://www.reddit.com/r/SPACs/comments/hh0zpd/super_spac/

https://www.reddit.com/r/SPACs/comments/l8zi08/phunware_a_history_lesson/

The SPAC, Stellar Acquisition III, never had any upward price movement while trading as STLR. Because the de-SPAC process did not have two upward price movements, STLR / PHUN was not an event SPAC / blockbuster SPAC.

Recently, Bitcoin (BTC USD) reached an all-time high in the $50,000s.

Due to its DA with crypto fintech play Bakkt, VIH has had one upward price movement during the six subsequent weeks or less: steady upward price movement to $15 and beyond (Price Movement #3). It has become an event SPAC / blockbuster SPAC candidate.

Even for a pre-merger ramp-up (Price Movement #5), I don't think VIH can reach the extraordinary $308.40.

Still, does this candidate have the potential to reach $300 in an immediate post-merger hype and crash movement (Special Price Movement #6) one month or less after ticker change?


GST on Cryptocurrency

The term cryptocurrency is generally used to describe a digital asset in which encryption techniques are used to regulate the generation of additional units and verify transactions on a blockchain. Cryptocurrency generally operates independently of a central bank, central authority or government.

Virtual currency is an emerging financial medium which may be used to pay for goods or services, or held for investment. These virtual currencies are a digital representation of value that functions as a medium of exchange, a unit of account, and/or a store of value. In some environments, it operates like “real” currency i.e., the coin and paper money of any other country that is designated as legal tender, circulates, and is customarily used and accepted as a medium of exchange in the country of issuance but it does not have legal tender status in any jurisdiction.

Cryptocurrencies like bitcoin are decentralized, digital currencies relying on a peer-to-peer network which operates without the need for a third-party intermediary like the Reserve Bank of India.

Bitcoin is one example of a convertible virtual currency. Bitcoin is a cryptocurrency, a form of payment that uses cryptography to control its creation and management, rather than relying on central authorities.

Unlike usual forms of currency, it is in virtual form and may be used to transact in physical as well as online transactions. Essentially, bitcoin is a snippet of codes based on algorithm first identified in a self-authored paper by Satoshi Nakamoto.

The creation and transfer of bitcoins is based on open source cryptographic protocol managed in a decentralized manner. Bitcoin network shares a public ledger called the “block chain”. The ledger contains details of every transaction processed, thereby, allowing user’s computer to verify the validity of each transaction. The authenticity of each transaction is protected by digital signatures corresponding to the sending addresses, permitting all users to have full control over sending bitcoins from their own bitcoin addresses.

Anyone can process transactions using the computing power of specialized hardware. This process is called “mining”. However, no centralized authority, governmental or otherwise, controls the digital system.

GST

As the digital currency is widely used and traded all round the globe the consequences of taxation need to be recognized. To tax the Cryptocurrencies in India under GST there is need to determine the Cryptocurrencies and the transaction from GST perspective.

GST is the tax on supply of Goods and Services. Hence it becomes primary concern to determine whether these Digital Currencies are Goods or Services.

Services generally mean anything other than Goods. Thus, if the Cryptocurrency is not Good then it can be referred to as services.

Goods

Under sec 2(52) of CGST Act Goods means every kind of movable property

other than money and securities but includes actionable claim growing crops, grass and things attached to or forming part of the land which are agreed to be severed before supply or under a contract of supply.

Referring the above definition and considering the first thought Can the cryptocurrency be considered as money?

Currency is generally defined as tokens used as money in a country. In addition to metal coins and paper bank notes, money orders, traveler’s checks, it also includes electronic money or digital cash.

To fit in this definition, which is not exhaustive,

· Either bitcoin has to be physical and movable, and fungible. It is movable and fungible but not physical.

· Electronic money or digital cash may include bitcoin but then it needs a legal backing from an authorized entity, which is not the case in India as of now.

The RBI Act does not specifically define currency, but it does define foreign currency to have the same meaning as in Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973, which has since been replaced by FEMA.

“Currency” includes all currency notes, postal notes, postal orders, money orders, cheques, drafts, travelers cheques, letters of credit, bills of exchange and promissory notes, credit cards or such other similar instruments, as may be notified by the Reserve Bank, as per Section 2(h) of Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999

FEMA defines ‘foreign currency’ as any currency other than Indian currency. Definition of ‘Indian Currency’ under FEMA states that Indian currency is the currency which is expressed or drawn in Indian Rupees.

The term currency notes are specifically defined in Section 2(i) of FEMA to mean and include cash in the form of coins and bank notes. This definition therefore does not cover Bitcoin which are not issued either under the Coinage Act or RBI Act.

Section 22 of the RBI Act provides that RBI has the sole right to issue bank notes and Section 26 provides that bank notes shall be legal tender in India. From the above it appears that while Bitcoin have several features of a currency or legal tender it is not bank notes and is consequently not legal tender in India. Accordingly, it is left to be examined if it falls within the purview of securities, derivatives, or commodities.

Considering the provisions of the law, it can be reasonably concluded that ‘virtual currency’ should be considered excluded from the definition of currency. While it may be argued that it may fall under ‘such other similar instruments’ under Section 2(h), but such ‘other instruments’ need to be specifically notified by the RBI which is not the case. Therefore, under the provisions of existing law, Bitcoin are not currency.

The system on which bitcoin works, is nothing but software, a set of codes which may be considered a ‘computer programme’. Indian Copyright Act, 1957 defines the word ‘computer programme’:

Section 2(ffc): "computer programme" means a set of instructions expressed in words, codes, schemes or in any other form, including a machine readable medium, capable of causing a computer to perform a particular task or achieve a particular result.

Under GST, if classified as software/computer programme a rate of 18% shall apply.

Bitcoins are in nature of intangible assets and whether the same can be classified as a commodity is a matter of interpretation. However, the provisions of Sale of goods act, 1930 apply to Bitcoins since Bitcoins can be sold and bought.

Bitcoins are stored in E-Wallet and transferred from them to other E-Wallet. Since the Bitcoins can be stored and transferred, the Sale of goods act applies to them.

Anything to which Sale of goods act, 1930 applied is classified as "Goods" under the said act. Further, if Bitcoins and other Cryptocurrencies are goods, they will be liable to tax.

In Tata Consultancy Services v/s State of Andhra Pradesh (AIR 2005 SC 371 ) the Honourable Supreme Court classified computer software as goods. It opined that whether or not the software was put on diskettes, floppy disc, etc. which is either tangible or intangible as a commodity which can be stored and transferred and thus liable to sales tax. Bitcoins and similar Cryptocurrencies being intangible is covered under the definition of goods as per the above order of Honourable Supreme Court of India and thus liable to tax.

Supply

The section 7 of CGST act States the scope of supply for Goods and Services to be taxed under GST.

Section 7(1)(a) all forms of supply of goods or services or both such as sale, transfer, barter, exchange, licence, rental, lease or disposal made or agreed to be made for a consideration by a person in the course or furtherance of business.

Above section clears that the supply of Goods includes Transfer, Barter and Exchange. Does the use of bitcoin amount to any of above?

Barter

The term ‘barter’ is defined in various dictionaries as follows: _

· The exchange of goods and productive services for other goods and productive services, without the use of money [The Black’s Law Dictionary]

· To exchange one commodity for another. Barter, exchange of wared for wares. Also, the thing given in exchange [The Law Lexicon]

This can be explained by an example. Say, X Accountant agrees to write the accounts of Hotel Y. It is agreed between X & Y that Y will provide free food to X as consideration for writing of accounts. Thus, X is providing service of writing accounts and Y is providing services of supply of food to X. In barter two-way supply takes place. X is making taxable supply of service of an account writing and Y is making taxable supply of food to X. Tax is payable by both.

In case of barter, the consideration is not in monetary form but it is in a non-monetary form. The consideration itself is separate supply. In these kinds of transaction, there are two-way supply. Therefore, each party to the transaction must pay GST on supply it makes. Each party will be entitled input tax credit provided the input has been used in the course or furtherance of business.

Exchange

The term ‘exchange’ is defined in various dictionaries as follows:

· When two persons mutually transfer the ownership of one thing for the ownership of another, neither thing nor both things being money only, the transaction is called an exchange [The Law Lexicon]

· To barter, to swap to part with, give or transfer for an equivalent [The Black’s Law Dictionary]

This can be explained by an example. Car dealers agrees to pay certain amount for receiving old car when the person buys new car. The old car is exchanged with the new car and the consideration for the old car is reduced from the sale price of new car. Say, X car dealer advertises that person buying new car, if surrenders his old car, the appropriate value of old car will be deducted from the price of new car. The price of new car is Rs. 7 lakhs and X who intends to buy new car provides old car to dealer say Y. The dealer agrees to reduce Rs. 50,000 on surrendering of old car. Under GST, it will be treated as X has made supply of old car to dealer Y and Y has made supply of new car to X. If X is registered person, he will be liable to pay GST on Rs. 50,000 and Y will be liable to pay GST on Rs. 7 lakhs whether Y is registered or not.

Barter can be defined as the direct exchange of goods or services for other goods or services without the exchange of money. Also, a supply of digital currency in exchange for goods or services can be treated as a barter transaction. Thus, where the bitcoins which are termed to be Goods are exchanged for any other goods or services, it tantamount to barter. Further as supply includes barter the same is taxable under GST

Crypto assets work exclusively on the internet by using a network of computers that lend their processing power to verify and register all the transactions made. In return for their work, computers are rewarded with a payment in the form of tokens. The system that allows for this to happen is known as the blockchain, and it is the fundamental force behind any crypto asset. The blockchain is formed by blocks and each block is a segment of the chain that holds the Ledger of transactions made with crypto assets.

To conclude transaction in its earliest form began with the barter system and now with crypto assets, we are going back to the same structure. Crypto assets are treated as a commodity today, just like gold.

Place of Supply

As Cryptocurrency can be treated as goods, the provisions of place of supply of goods can be considered to determine the place of supply:

Section 10(1)(a) of IGST Act specify the place of supply of goods other than import & export shall be as follows:

Where the supply involves the movement of goods, whether by the supplier or the recipient or by any other person place of supply will be the location of the goods at the time at which, the movement of goods terminates for delivery to the recipient.

Here in this definition movement of goods may include both physical or virtual movement of goods.

Section 11 of the IGST Act specify the place of supply of goods imported into or exported from India as follows:

(a) Imported into India shall be the location of the importer

(b) Exported from India shall be the location outside India.

GST on Mining of bitcoins

The essential elements for taxing a service therefore includes (i) supply of taxable services, (ii) in furtherance of a business (iii) for a consideration and (iv) a supply of service to be provided by a party (service provider) in favour of another party (service receiver), unless any of these are specifically exempt under the Act. There must also be a direct link between the consideration and the service provided, based on a contractual relationship.

Assuming the mining activity is done in furtherance of business, any transaction of mining, prima facie appears to be a ‘service’ within the am- bit of the Act, since it is a supply of computing power (service), by the bitcoin miner (service provider) to the users of bitcoin system (service recipient) in exchange for bitcoins. Here, though the recipient is not identifiable, it may be included within the ambit of the ‘body of individuals’ and accordingly, the value generated would be considered to be inclusive of GST.

It is also essential to note that any activity performed without consideration is outside the ambit of ‘supply’ under GST. In cases of bitcoin mining, not every miner is rewarded with bitcoins for solving cryptographic algorithms, as mining is a competitive process whereby only successful miners are rewarded with new bitcoins. Thus, an unsuccessful supply of computing power would not be taxable under GST.

Tax on Mining Bitcoins have to be mined, which is recorded in the blockchain, a public ledger of all transactions. Mining will be treated as a supply of service since it generates cryptocurrency and involves rewards and transaction fees, according to people aware of the matter. Tax should be collected from the miner on transaction fees or reward, and if value of the reward exceeds Rs 20 lakh, individual miners will have to register under GST.

Wallets storing keys that help users send and receive virtual currencies should also be taxed under the GST, according to the proposal. Wallet service providers will also have to register under GST.

Cryptocurrency exchanges will have to register under GST and pay tax on the commission they earn, according to the proposal. For exchanges located outside India, service provided by them to Indians would be considered import of a service, and they will have to pay IGST.

Section 13 of IGST Act specify the place of supply of services in case of cross-border supplies as follows:

The place of supply will be the location of the recipient except the following situation

The place of supply will be the of the following services shall be the location where the services are actually performed,

  1. Services supplied for goods that are required to be made physically available from a remote location by way of electronic means will be the location where the services are actually performed, The location where the goods are situated.

  2. Services supplied to an individual and requiring the physical presence of the receiver will be the location where the services are actually performed.

  3. Immovable property-related services, including hotel accommodation will be the location at which the immovable property is located.

  4. Admission to or organization of an event will be the place where the event is actually held.

  5. If the said three services are supplied at more than one locations. i.e., (i) Goods & individual related (ii) Immovable property-related (iii) Event related

At more than one location, including a location in the taxable territory Its place of supply shall be the location in the taxable territory where the greatest proportion of the service is provided

  1. In more than one State, place of supply shall be each such State in proportion to the value of services provided in each State

Location of the recipient of service If not available in the ordinary course of business: The location of the supplier of service will be the place of supply.

Export and Import

The sub-sections (5) & (6) of section 2 of IGST Act defines ‘export of goods’ and ‘export of services’ respectively. The provisions are reproduced below:

(5) “export of goods” with its grammatical variations and cognate expressions, means taking out of India to a place outside India;

(6) “export of service” means supply of any service when—

(i) the supplier of service is located in India

(ii) the recipient of service is located outside India

(iii) the place of supply of service is outside India

(iv) the payment for such service has been received by the supplier of service in convertible foreign exchange, and

(v) the supplier of service and recipient of service are not merely establishments of a distinct person in accordance with explanation 1 of section 8

From the above definition can be analysed in the following manner:

If a person located in India has Cryptocurrency wants to sell to a person located outside India. In this scenario there is a virtual transfer will happen from India to another country which is located outside India. So, it may be treated as an Export from India.

Further, the paragraph 5(c) and paragraph 5(d) of Schedule II specifies following transaction as transaction in service.

“(c) Temporary transfer or permitting the use or enjoyment of any intellectual property right;

(d)Development, design, programming, customisation, adaptation, upgradation, enhancement, implementation of information technology software.”

In the case of data mining Mining will be treated as a supply of service since it generates cryptocurrency and involves rewards and transaction fees, according to people aware of the matter. Thus, these activities will be considered as services. There are many companies who export computer software regularly. If they are exported through internet it will be considered as services. However, if they are exported by incorporating software in any medium, they are considered as export of goods. But now because of provisions contained in paragraph 5(c) and 5(d) of Schedule II, these items of export will be considered as ‘export of service’ and not ‘export of goods’ under Goods and Services Tax Act.

The import of goods and import of services have been defined in section (10) and section 2(11) of the IGST Act respectively. These are reproduced below:

2(10) “import of goods” with its grammatical variations and cognate expressions, means bringing into India from a place outside India;

2(11) “import of service” means the supply of any service where—

(a) The supplier of service is located outside India,

(b) The recipient of service is located in India, and

The place of supply of service is in India.


Blockchain – Underlying Technology of Virtual currency

The underlying technology of cryptocurrencies is the Internet of value. For nearly four decades we have internet of information. It vastly improved the flow of data within and among firms and people, but it has not transformed how we do business. That's because the Internet was designed to move information, not value from person to person.

To do a business transaction, we cannot email money directly to someone not just because copying money is illegal but because we can't be 100 percent sure our recipient is who says he is. Information about identity needs to be scarce, permanent, and unchangeable. Banks, Governments, and even big technology companies confirm our identities and enable us to transfer assets, they clear and settle transactions and keep records of these transfers.

The Blockchain, Satoshi Nakamoto's innovation, is the heart and soul of Cryptocurrencies. It secures the cryptocurrency by, among other things, making it impossible for someone to counterfeit bitcoin, which isn’t an easy task.

In the simplest terms, the Blockchain is just a ledger that lists all the units of the cryptocurrency and who owns them. As money changes hands, the ledger is rewritten to reflect the transaction. This way it does not matter where the money is physically located as long as there is a single unit of all the units in existence, and who owns how much.

1. Distributed ledger technology

Distributed ledger technology – commonly referred to as Blockchain – has emerged as a candidate for financial institutions to reform their businesses. The speed and cost of doing business using distributed ledger technology are expected to improve by simplifying back-office operations and lowering the need for human intervention. However, a number of security concerns around this new technology remain.

Instead of depending on a central entity such as a single financial institution to track the validity of ownership of funds, a distributed ledger maintains all transactions and holdings and is updated by a number of counterparties.

It is a peer-to-peer ledger that is distributed in nature based on the principle that the "world can exist without intermediaries or third parties and it works based on consensus i.e., validation mechanisms programmed on different nodes of its network.

2. Blockchain is composed of three core parts:

a. Blocks: A list of transactions recorded into a ledger over a given period. The size, period, and triggering event for blocks are different for every blockchain. Not all blockchains are recording and securing a record of the movement of their cryptocurrency as their primary objective. But all the blockchain do record the movement of their cryptocurrency or token. Think of the transaction as simple as being recording the data. Assigning a value to it (such as happens in a financial transaction) is used to interpret what data means. Each Block is formed by a proof of work algorithm, through which consensus of this distributed system could be obtained via the longest possible chain.

b. Chain: A Hash that links one block to another, mathematically chaining them together. This is one of the most difficult concepts in blockchain to Comprehend. It’s also the magic that glues blockchains together and allows them to create mathematical trust. The hash in a blockchain is created from the data that was in the previous block. The hash is a fingerprint of this data and locks blocks in order and time. Although blockchain is a relatively new innovation, hashing is not. Hashing was invented over 30 years ago. This old innovation is being used because it creates a one-way function that cannot be decrypted. A hashing function creates a mathematical algorithm that maps data of any size to a bit string of a fixed size. A bit string is usually 32 characters long, which then represents the data that was hashed. The Secured Hash Algorithm (SHA) is one of some cryptographic hash functions used in a blockchain. SHA 256 is a common algorithm that generates an almost unique, fixed-size 256-bit (32 bytes) hash. For practical purposes, think of a hash as a digital fingerprint of data that is used to lock it in a place within the blockchain.

c. Network: The network is composed of "full nodes”. Think of them as a computer running an algorithm that is securing the network. Each node contains a complete record of all the transactions that were ever recorded in that Blockchain. The nodes are located all over the world and can be operated by anyone

3. How Blockchain Works?

In a step-by-step way-

Step 1

A user requests a transaction

Step 2

The request is transmitted to the network

Step 3

The network validates the transaction or the transaction is not accepted

Step 4

The transaction is added to the current block of transactions

Step 5

The block of the transaction is then chained to the older block of transactions

Step 6

The transaction is confirmed.

Blockchain technology is a new tool with potential applications for organizations, enabling secure transactions without the need for a central authority. The use of Blockchain technology is still in its early stages, but it is built on widely understood and sound cryptographic principles. Currently, there is a lot of hype around the technology, and many proposed uses for it.

Transactions of any kind will be cheaper, fast, and secure when completed via Blockchain. The intermediaries and mediators will be misplaced.

For currencies, these are banks, for patents- the patent office, for election- the electoral commission, for smart contracts- the executors, and for public service- the state authorities.

Blockchain technology goes far beyond cryptocurrencies and tokens and its usefulness as a wider economic and administrative tool is well worth exploring.

Companies, as well as authorities, are exploring different aspects of Blockchain. They are doing so with an objective to create a system that is safe and secure. Blockchain will be helpful in creating brand value; it will create more opportunities to explore in the future. Since Blockchain has many features that the companies might be looking at when they want to promote themselves, it becomes one of the most sought–after technology for the future.