Saturday, October 1, 2022

This Week in Crypto: Issue #1, Sep 25 - Oct 2

Welcome to the first issue of This Week In Crypto: a summary of the week’s events with cryptocurrency prices, events, and updates!

With all that said, let’s start:

The market traded mostly sideways this week

According to CoinGecko, Bitcoin and Ethereum traded at about 3.5% higher than the start of last week, with a ~7% pump on Tuesday, before correcting. At the time of writing (October 1st), the market was pretty stable, with a minor crash at around 1 am EST (5 am UTC). USD has also jumped by nearly 20% according to the U.S Dollar Index.

GBP also suffered an enormous crash of 8% in 3 days after the UK government cut tax rates. The pound has now recovered about 3-4%.

Solana faces 6th outage this year

The Solana chain had to undergo a network restart after the chain crashed due to a duplicate validator. When it was the faulty validators' turn to produce a block, they created one for each instance in the same slot. This led to some validators seeing one of the same blocks, and some the others, leading to the validators not being able to agree which one was correct.

Solana was down for a total of 6 hours and 19 minutes, restarting at 3 am EST (7 am UTC).

SEC ordered to hand over emails about Ethereum

A judge has ordered the U.S Securities and Exchange Commission to turn over emails about Ethereum’s regulation status. This comes after a 2018 quote from the former top SEC official, William Hinman, saying that Ethereum was not a security because it was ‘sufficiently decentralized'. However, Ethereum’s merge to Proof-of-Stake has some speculating whether or not it is a security, due to Ethereum’s new issuance mechanism to validators.

Do Kwon now wanted in 195 countries

Interpol approved South Korean prosecutors’ request to issue a ‘red notice’ against Do Kwon. He has been charged with violating capital markets rules in South Korea, and law enforcement agencies across the globe will now begin to cooperate and arrest the Terraform Labs founder.

He claims he is “not on the run” and “fully cooperating with government agencies”.

Well, that wraps up this issue of This Week In Crypto! The next issue will be posted on October 9th, so stay tuned!

Also, if you have any requests for which news I should summarize on these posts, be sure to send an article or story to the comments or my PMs.

See you next week!


Top Crypto Events of October 2022

Happy New Month Everyone 🎉

In this video I'm bringing to you some of the major crypto events and updates I think should be on your radar

Even though Bitcoin still seems to be dragging the entire crypto market sideways since its crash, that doesn't prevent the builders from building. Its such growth that would lead to great gains in the next bull run Enjoy 💖🙏

https://youtu.be/POzvr1gaB50


P4S | PlexStory Inc| Resellers Plan | Plex Appbox | Plex Share | Google TD Shares|Automatic | website | 10GPS | Remux | 4K | Anime | Kids Tv | 27k+M | 10k+T | Automated invoice

Locations - USA (Live) - Middle East (Upcoming) - Europe (Currently Live) - CDN enabled.You can choose your CDN relay , multiple services worldwide Join us via this website: - https://billing.vpnsaga.com/ Services - Plex Share - Plex Appbox Shared - Dedicated Reseller Appbox - IPTV (included PPV events) (VPN app for android user included) - Google Drive Share - Website disguised as VPN provider. Library - 10k + Tv Shows. - 27k + Movies. - 1500 + 4K Movies - 400+ 4K Tv - 800+ Anime -Few foreign films and tv. Total around 2k ish Payment options: - Bitcoin/Bitcoin Cash/Etherium/Litecoin/Dash/XRP/USDT - Paypal Resellers Information(sell my products direcly on your website) - All you have to do is just order my services like normal ! - You buy my service for X amount and up charge it to your clients for X amount ! - You get a dedicated server with a specific amount of appbox.additional appbox can be installed on request - You can sell appbox,plex shares or both as per your wish Information You May Want To Know - Instant scans - We have limited amount of spots. - Auto Requests enabled on appbox - We use GPU for transcoding. - Transcode allowed besides 4k Content. - Instant Setup DISCORD https://discord.gg/QZm8UmQjhY Limited slots.Once we hit our user limits,you will not be able to sign up


A Big truth about bitcoin and crypto in general.

The only time a ledger would be used is if it was the case for paintings and digital records like nfts and other digital item token like marketplace

We didnt need that for bitcoin

if you sell hashrates to a person for a currency that agreement has to be fufilled

we did need that for bitcoin

I didnt need any help with doing a very simple encrypted network with positive id for mining on a service and hosted multispace,

so i didnt need those peoples inputs into my machine, my network, they lied said i was invading others rights, they lied and said "there is a 21m cap", they spread these LIES FAR VERY FAR, they created a formation of illuminati, a formation of a power that forces you to comply, its not okey doke just gonna stop then, it put me in the hospital multiple times, over one million people slander my fucking very name on the internet and even during huge events, radio consistently, host massive bitcoin conferences, all off of something that I did, no reward for me,

Empty Plate Again

there heads will be on pikes, and they will die in the blood of conflict and war if im not payed in fucking full.

i only trade crypto if its sec backed, and its only a good start, i would primarily wait until they become stable coins to trade on them,

thats my opinions, because doing it the other way seems more like trying to hide data trafficking and human trafficking, and id rather see them go to jail.

think about what someone is saying 90% of cryptos are there to scam, and trust me when i say, if you cant go directly from any held crypto wallet to your bank after selling without a fault then it is complete junk and throw it away.

where is bitcoin?

yes, its in the trashbin

why?

because, me, simply put, they still dont want to cough up my bitcoin for some god aweful selfish disgusting freak bag human trafficking needed use case international affairs ass lying peices of fucking trash that belong spit and stomped on after hanging on a cross with there dick ripped off or there ass and vigina made into one.

they needed a ledger (which is good) but they also WANTED exchangable, i completely fucking DISagree if i made something to mine for the department of defense and your just able to walk up and fucking loot my money for my hashrates that was agreed upon then ive got a big fucking problem with you freaks, polygraph the faggots and throw them into cells, done

Craig wright and satoshi nakamoto are the pieces of dogshit trash that belong in the fucking ground for attacking me and my family with there machines, end of the fucking story.


Myth: Halvings are followed by price increases

This one is super widespread, and basically everyone points to some variant of this image, which can be found over at investopedia. "It happened twice before, so it'll happen again."

https://preview.redd.it/9h3w08ib0ar91.jpg?width=1600&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=b61af70979b81a4d09294272a2d024add24e6279

This chart hasn't been updated since early 2020. There were only two halvings at that time which is not a lot of data points.

The ATH in 2017 was $19,140 which is about the same as the price is today. So that third halving has not actually seen a net price increase over the ATH of the previous round. 2/3 isn't a statistically strong record.

We can look at other coins for more data. Litecoin's most recent halving was in Aug 2019 at a price of $90. It then dropped over the next 6 months to a low of $35. It's only $52 now. Here's an old chart of Litecoin from the same source:

https://preview.redd.it/yurpravj2ar91.png?width=1600&format=png&auto=webp&s=e8129e37ca5b3da049bf962930b9a84001f8e676

Some researchers looked at 32 halving events across a bunch of coins and concluded that there was basically no evidence that cryptocurrencies experiencing a halving event outperform the broader market in the months leading up to, and following, a reduction in miner rewards. Here's a chart they produced:

https://preview.redd.it/n3exvbqw2ar91.jpg?width=657&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=589d8d0868e5c9ed7dee3592cbb588154cbd18e6

Definitely hard to see any difference from halving here.

One thing we know for sure though is that miners make half as much coin after a halving as they do before. That's why it's called a halving. If the price doesn't increase to match, their revenues are cut in half with the same costs. For bitcoin miners, that means no profits at all at today's mining costs.

The next BTC halving is in only April 2024.


[Pet Site Game] Neopet's introduces NFTs, burns itself (and it's goodwill) to the ground!

Many of you are probably in least vaguely familiar with Neopets.com, one of the biggest browser games of its era and the most popular virtual pet site ever made. Users can adopt, raise and customise their very own virtual pets, choosing from over 50 unique species. At its peak the game had over 35 million users, and over 4 billion page views a month. Odds are you either had a neopets account of your own, or knew someone that did - especially if you're part of its peak audience of 90's kids. It's had its ups and downs over the last 20 years, with many users feeling the site has long been in a slow decline. However, the most recent drama has caused an absolutely unprecedented explosion of outrage and disappointment within the remaining userbase. Why? Because Neopets has broken a multi-month long near silence with its playerbase to announce its releasing NFTs. EDIT: **What the fuck is an NFT?**NFT stands for Non-Fungible Token. It is a form of digital collectible that exists on a blockchain, similar to those the famous Bitcoin uses. The technology of blockchains means that each NFT is verifiably unique. They are bought and sold using a variety of cryptocurrencies. However, it is important to note that while many NFTs are tied to digital artwork, what you are buying is not the artwork. You gain no rights to it whatsoever, nor any exclusivity outside of the NFT world. What you buy is essentially a digital receipt with the artwork on it. NFTs by themselves serve no other function. The Neopets NFTS will be 20.0k randomly generated pet images to be used as profile pictures. This on its own would have been a pretty unpopular move, but the way the userbase found out that they were making NFTs wasn't from Neopets themselves - no, the userbase found out when a tiny, dodgy-as-all-fuck shell company and a random child company of neopets' parent company, NetDragon, announced that neopets were releasing a special collection of "metaverse" NFTs. The company in question immediately raised red flags within the community as the website seemed to lack even basic understanding of the game, using generic gaming terms instead of terms specific to Neopets (such as "skins" instead of "paintbrush colours", "character" instead of "species" etc) and using generic fantasy stock art as the sites background instead of art from the game (you know, like a neopets project should!). Joining the projects discord also revealed there were no actual neopets staff in there at all, and it appeared to be run by completely random strangers. On top of this, sharp eyed users quickly realised that the project was using assets stolen from a fan-made website instead of actual game assets. How did they know? Its quite simple really - this specific NFT example features a pet called a Dimensional Kougra. Looks kinda funny, and even more so when you realise that this is what a dimensional kougra looks like on the actual games website. And this is what a dimensional kougra looks like on the fan-site Dress To Impress. Oops! Even more damning, is that once pointed out they swiftly edited this "AI generated unique neopet" into a slightly different one - this is also functionality from Dress To Impress, which is a fan aggregated dress-up tool to preview on-site cosmetics. A comparison of an archived version of the site can be found here, so you can compare it to the edited live site here (this live version still has the stolen DTI version of a pet called the Eventide Kacheek on it, though, so they did a pretty poor job of hiding the blatant asset theft). People were, naturally, extremely upset by this development. Many users announced they would be quitting the site if the project were real, and others posted anxiously hoping it was fake. Tumblr, reddit, twitter and discord was filled with anxious and furious users begging The Neopets Team for answers as to whether this extremely suspicious NFT scam was an officially sanctioned project. Answers finally came after many hours when users dm'd the games support team on twitter and were told that it was probably a scam. Relief and laughter set in, as users realised this was another poor quality scam from an NFT company trying to cash in on nostalgia. I mean, what kind of professional project uses stolen fan assets, generic stock images and can't even get basic facts about the game its based on correct, amirite? EDIT: I edited the post and all the links broke. Need to fix! EDIT2: Should be fixed, thanks to everyone who commented pointing out the post broke! Except, shock flipping horror - it's bloody real! This is a real circus, run by clowns hired by the Neopets team themselves. Mayhem sets in. Neopets is immediately set upon by hundreds of extremely upset fans. The tweet announcing the NFTs from the initial account is the single most engaged with social media post the company has had for over a decade. They were, as the kids say, beating their ass in the quote retweets. The response to the feedback from the neopets team was essentially "we know you're upset, but don't worry - its a real project and not a scam!" Suffice to say, people were pissed. The official response did little to actually address player concerns, such as "why the fuck are you doing this" and "we am going to kick your ass stop buying premium and microtransactions until you stop". Never in the sites history has the site been so united in anything, with the response being a universal "NFTs? No Fucking Thanks Lol". However, naturally, there are two sides to this story, with the vaguely nostalgic crypto-community being very excited to return to "neo pets". Some of these users were unhappy that when they went to the on-site forums, the neoboards, they were met than a less than friendly reaction, dismissing peoples complaints and research into why nfts are essentially a scam as "misinformation" and bad takes. The general sentiment is that all these hundreds of distressed players were just misinformed, and that they just needed to be told the ""truth"" about nfts (from articles from pro-nft websites, of course) and they would come around. At this point, things become a little difficult to accurately share via screencaps, as the neoboards moved so fast, and are archived beyond view so quickly that it is virtually impossible for me to go back and screenshot the full range of conversations that were had (most of them were Not Very Civil). Goes without saying though, that shit got heated. Pro-nfters generally came across as condescending douchebags that ignored multiple arguments users had against the NFT project to focus on the few genuinely misinformed posts (often mis-quoting users in order to re-address the same points over and over). They would often talk about scrapping the old game entirely, mocking the people that were upset by this in the NFT projects discord, saying it was good to get an NFT project so the funds could "save" the site. Then they would go straight to the neoboards and complain that they weren't being given their fair shot. Nevermind that neopets users pointed out repeatedly that Neopets' main issue wasn't finance, but organisation (a huge topic too large to cover here entirely). They knew better than the people that had played the game consistently for over two decades, naturally. Neopets users on the other hand delighted in thoroughly "cyberbullying" people they saw as coming to astroturf the neo-boards, many of them getting site-warnings for getting too heated with their arguments, with mods hastily deleting the spicier and less constructive threads. One NFT user spent 28 straight hours responding to people dissing the terrible move, going above and beyond to astro-turf in defence of the project, and encouraging other people to do the same. Naturally, players were not pleased to see someone trying to desperately convince people to buy into something they saw as a scam, and they did not get a happy reception. Time for a quick break, and for some more context: 1. Why are neopets players so upset? - The overlap between "neopets players who actually play and enjoy the site" and "people who enjoy NFT's" is microscopic. The site has been in a gradual decline for a while now, with the staff at neopets (TNT - The Neopets Team) slowly reducing roadmap updates, content updates, site layout, and community engagement. A newly hired community manager held one giveaway and then immediately stopped posting, events earlier in the year had been beset by bugs, poor planning and rampant cheating, and generally speaking, the last thing the community wanted was something utterly pointless as an off-site project, despite TNT's claims that it wouldn't affect the sites development. They wanted real updates, meaningful roadmap planning, and real communication with the playerbase. Not whatever the fuck this is. 2. Isn't the site dying? Wouldn't the money from a pump and dump NFT project like this help the site? Selling 20k NFT profile pics would make a lot of money. - This is a big one, but the short version is that neopets still has a very active userbase, many of which spending large amounts of money on the site purchasing cosmectics (essentially the only feature that is regularly updated) and supporting the site. Its predicted that theres about 100,000 daily active users still, 1.5 million visitors a month - the site is nowhere near as popular as it once was, but it most definitely isn't completely destitute. Money and active players are not the issue, organisation and care is. Neopets have even done an NFT before, and that one was an actual game and not just static randomly generated PNGS. This ended with the games closure after a few months however, with about 1.8k purchases made and the tokens and cards being made useless when the company went bust. Everyone that bought into that was promptly suckered out of their money and lost everything they "invested". Neopets does not need more crypto scams, it needs a development team that cares about it. Grab some water and buckle up because things are about to get Even Spicier. So, as someone familiar with crypto and NFT's might know, the community space comes from a... dubious place. One of the web haunts quickest to adopt and celebrate all things crypto was 4chan, and the kind of lingo and terminology 4channers use (which NFTers use by extension) do not exactly mesh well with the lgbt-family-friendly vibe of neopets and its users. One term in particular started being thrown around, "oldf*g", and some members who weren't overly familiar with "the lingo" were naturally pretty fucking upset that people were seemingly fine with slurs being thrown around. The NFT server mods, of course, who come from that "community" were completely fine with this and ignored people pointing it out and complaining about it for a full 24 hours, and allowed users to dogpile on people complaining. They also ignored one user calling another a "f*ggot" for several hours afterwards, again, with users actively asking for moderation. The mods response? Kind of comedy gold actually. Turns out they don't have a PHD in AI so can't stop users saying the word "f*ggot". For the blissfully unaware "fudding" basically means "spreading FUD (Fear Uncertain Doubt)" and its commonly used by NFT types to tell people to shut the fuck up and stop being critical/killing the hype. Other users within the discord continued to dogpile users who were upset and pointing out there were still people using slurs, finally culminating in this head scratcher of an exchange. - Acktually slurs are all ⠀about context - Stop pulling the gay card :/ Nothing good came out of this exchange. This timeline is still evolving, and it seems like every single day the situation finds away to get even more embarassing for all parties involved. Some fun tidbits: 1. The NFT server moderators accidentally made a hidden channel public where they talk about ways to try to get TNT to silence the player base by releasing some features players have been waiting for for the past few months, distracting them from the current fires. 2. One of the NFT server minimods coming to the neopets community discord and trying to convince people that the things they were screenshotted saying were actually never said. 3. The Neopets Metaverse account retweeting whatever this weird NSFW HornyHedgehogs shit is from an account linked to a family friendly game. 4. The Neopets Staff deleting a contest winner on the site because their entry contained the text "NoNeoNFTs", only to immediately backpedal after realising what a terrible idea it was, restoring the first place entry with a tiny heavily blurred version nobody could read. This all literally only scratches the surface of the drama over the last 8 days, and if you'd like to read more the fansite Jellyneo has been consistently posting and tracking the drama on their twitter: https://twitter.com/jellyneo/. No doubt come monday the circus will continue and I will have to edit this post or make a followup. If you are a neopets player, and would like to make your voice heard beyond the tweets/neo-board posts/discord etc, there is a petition here organised by some community members: https://www.change.org/p/jumpstart-get-nfts-out-of-neopets TL'DR: Neopets announces NFTs, consistently embarrasses themselves literally every day since. Thanks for reading! This post attempted to summarise over 8 solid days of near constant drama and mis-steps from Neopets, so hopefully it makes sense and is mostly free of fluff and errors. And no, your neopets are not dead, try logging in and you'll see for yourself!


Don't forget that in just 30 minutes we have the Z-Brain event, the #BitcoinZ Community's Online Meeting. Add a notification to the YouTube link in order to not lose the live streaming!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9bj_nH951ic

Quant Finance Arxiv submissions 2022-09-12 - 2022-09-18

Quant Finance Arxiv submissions 2022-09-12 - 2022-09-18

This is your weekly snap of quant finance submissions to the Arxiv. Papers are sorted in reverse chronological order of the original publication date. i.e. the newest papers are at the top, revisions are lower down the list.

If any paper take your fancy, you're encouraged to submit a link post to the subreddit, and start the discussion in the comments. Or in this thread, what do I care I'm not your boss.

Model-based gym environments for limit order book trading

Authors: Joseph Jerome, Leandro Sanchez-Betancourt, Rahul Savani, Martin Herdegen

Categories: Mathematical Finance, Trading and Market Microstructure, Computational Finance

PDF: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2209.07823v1

Dates: originally published: 2022-09-16, updated: 2022-09-16

Summary: Within the mathematical finance literature there is a rich catalogue of mathematical models for studying algorithmic trading problems -- such as market-making and optimal execution -- in limit order books. This paper introduces \mbtgym, a Python module that provides a suite of gym environments for training reinforcement learning (RL) agents to solve such model-based trading problems. The module is set up in an extensible way to allow the combination of different aspects of different models. It supports highly efficient implementations of vectorized environments to allow faster training of RL agents. In this paper, we motivate the challenge of using RL to solve such model-based limit order book problems in mathematical finance, we explain the design of our gym environment, and then demonstrate its use in solving standard and non-standard problems from the literature. Finally, we lay out a roadmap for further development of our module, which we provide as an open source repository on GitHub so that it can serve as a focal point for RL research in model-based algorithmic trading.

Multivariate Hawkes-based Models in LOB: European, Spread and Basket Option Pricing

Authors: Qi Guo, Anatoliy Swishchuk, Bruno Rémillard

Categories: Mathematical Finance, Pricing of Securities

PDF: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2209.07621v1

Dates: originally published: 2022-09-15, updated: 2022-09-15

Summary: In this paper, we consider pricing of European options and spread options for Hawkes-based model for the limit order book. We introduce multivariate Hawkes process and the multivariable general compound Hawkes process. Exponential multivariate general compound Hawkes processes and limit theorems for them, namely, LLN and FCLT, are considered then. We also consider a special case of one-dimensional EMGCHP and its limit theorems. Option pricing with $1D$ EGCHP in LOB, hedging strategies, and numerical example are presented. We also introduce greeks calculations for those models. Margrabe's spread options valuations with Hawkes-based models for two assets and numerical example are presented. Also, Margrabe's spread option pricing with two $2D$ EMGCHP and numerical example are included. Basket options valuations with numerical example are included. We finally discuss the implied volatility and implied order flow. It reveals the relationship between stock volatility and the order flow in the limit order book system. In this way, the Hawkes-based model can provide more market forecast information than the classical Black-Scholes model.

Measuring Tail Risks

Authors: Kan Chen, Tuoyuan Cheng

Categories: Statistical Finance, Risk Management

PDF: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2209.07092v1

Dates: originally published: 2022-09-15, updated: 2022-09-15

Summary: Value at risk (VaR) and expected shortfall (ES) are common high quantile-based risk measures adopted in financial regulations and risk management. In this paper, we propose a tail risk measure based on the most probable maximum size of risk events (MPMR) that can occur over a length of time. MPMR underscores the dependence of the tail risk on the risk management time frame. Unlike VaR and ES, MPMR does not require specifying a confidence level. We derive the risk measure analytically for several well-known distributions. In particular, for the case where the size of the risk event follows a power law or Pareto distribution, we show that MPMR also scales with the number of observations $n$ (or equivalently the length of the time interval) by a power law, $\text{MPMR}(n) \propto n{\eta}$, where $\eta$ is the scaling exponent. The scale invariance allows for reasonable estimations of long-term risks based on the extrapolation of more reliable estimations of short-term risks. The scaling relationship also gives rise to a robust and low-bias estimator of the tail index (TI) $\xi$ of the size distribution, $\xi = 1/\eta$. We demonstrate the use of this risk measure for describing the tail risks in financial markets as well as the risks associated with natural hazards (earthquakes, tsunamis, and excessive rainfall).

Feature-Rich Long-term Bitcoin Trading Assistant

Authors: Jatin Nainani, K. J. Somaiya College of Engineering, Nirman Taterh, K. J. Somaiya College of Engineering, Md Ausaf Rashid, K. J. Somaiya College of Engineering, Ankit Khivasara, K. J. Somaiya College of Engineering

Categories: Statistical Finance

PDF: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2209.12664v1

Dates: originally published: 2022-09-14, updated: 2022-09-14

Summary: For a long time predicting, studying and analyzing financial indices has been of major interest for the financial community. Recently, there has been a growing interest in the Deep-Learning community to make use of reinforcement learning which has surpassed many of the previous benchmarks in a lot of fields. Our method provides a feature rich environment for the reinforcement learning agent to work on. The aim is to provide long term profits to the user so, we took into consideration the most reliable technical indicators. We have also developed a custom indicator which would provide better insights of the Bitcoin market to the user. The Bitcoin market follows the emotions and sentiments of the traders, so another element of our trading environment is the overall daily Sentiment Score of the market on Twitter. The agent is tested for a period of 685 days which also included the volatile period of Covid-19. It has been capable of providing reliable recommendations which give an average profit of about 69%. Finally, the agent is also capable of suggesting the optimal actions to the user through a website. Users on the website can also access the visualizations of the indicators to help fortify their decisions.

Computing XVA for American basket derivatives by Machine Learning techniques

Authors: Ludovic Goudenege, Andrea Molent, Antonino Zanette

Categories: Computational Finance

PDF: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2209.06485v1

Dates: originally published: 2022-09-14, updated: 2022-09-14

Summary: Total value adjustment (XVA) is the change in value to be added to the price of a derivative to account for the bilateral default risk and the funding costs. In this paper, we compute such a premium for American basket derivatives whose payoff depends on multiple underlyings. In particular, in our model, those underlying are supposed to follow the multidimensional Black-Scholes stochastic model. In order to determine the XVA, we follow the approach introduced by Burgard and Kjaer \cite{burgard2010pde} and afterward applied by Arregui et al. \cite{arregui2017pde,arregui2019monte} for the one-dimensional American derivatives. The evaluation of the XVA for basket derivatives is particularly challenging as the presence of several underlings leads to a high-dimensional control problem. We tackle such an obstacle by resorting to Gaussian Process Regression, a machine learning technique that allows one to address the curse of dimensionality effectively. Moreover, the use of numerical techniques, such as control variates, turns out to be a powerful tool to improve the accuracy of the proposed methods. The paper includes the results of several numerical experiments that confirm the goodness of the proposed methodologies.

Learning Value-at-Risk and Expected Shortfall

Authors: D Barrera, UNIANDES, S Crépey, LPSM, UPCité, E Gobet, CMAP, X, Hoang-Dung Nguyen, LPSM, UPCité, B Saadeddine, UPS

Categories: Computational Finance

PDF: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2209.06476v1

Dates: originally published: 2022-09-14, updated: 2022-09-14

Summary: We propose a non-asymptotic convergence analysis of a two-step approach to learn a conditional value-at-risk (VaR) and expected shortfall (ES) in a nonparametric setting using Rademacher and Vapnik-Chervonenkis bounds. Our approach for the VaR is extended to the problem of learning at once multiple VaRs corresponding to different quantile levels. This results in efficient learning schemes based on neural network quantile and least-squares regressions. An a posteriori Monte Carlo (non-nested) procedure is introduced to estimate distances to the ground-truth VaR and ES without access to the latter. This is illustrated using numerical experiments in a Gaussian toy-model and a financial case-study where the objective is to learn a dynamic initial margin.

ESG-valued discrete option pricing in complete markets

Authors: Yuan Hu, W. Brent Lindquist, Svetlozar T. Rachev

Categories: Pricing of Securities

PDF: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2209.06276v1

Dates: originally published: 2022-09-13, updated: 2022-09-13

Summary: We consider option pricing using replicating binomial trees, with a two fold purpose. The first is to introduce ESG valuation into option pricing. We explore this in a number of scenarios, including enhancement of yield due to trader information and the impact of the past history of a market driver. The second is to emphasize the use of discrete dynamic pricing, rather than continuum models, as the natural model that governs actual market practice. We further emphasize that discrete option pricing models must use discrete compounding (such as risk-free rate compounding of $1+r_f \Delta t$) rather than continuous compounding (such as $e{r_f \Delta t})$.

A stochastic volatility model for the valuation of temperature derivatives

Authors: Aurélien Alfonsi, Nerea Vadillo

Categories: Risk Management

PDF: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2209.05918v1

Dates: originally published: 2022-09-13, updated: 2022-09-13

Summary: This paper develops a new stochastic volatility model for the temperature that is a natural extension of the Ornstein-Uhlenbeck model proposed by Benth and Benth (2007). This model allows to be more conservative regarding extreme events while keeping tractability. We give a method based on Conditional Least Squares to estimate the parameters on daily data and estimate our model on eight major European cities. We then show how to calculate efficiently the average payoff of weather derivatives both by Monte-Carlo and Fourier transform techniques. This new model allows to better assess the risk related to temperature volatility.

Meta-CTA Trading Strategies and Rational Market Failures

Authors: Bernhard K Meister

Categories: Portfolio Management

PDF: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2209.05360v1

Dates: originally published: 2022-09-12, updated: 2022-09-12

Summary: Investors trade shifting prices, portfolio values, and in turn their ability to borrow. Concentrated ownership, high price impact and low collateral requirements are propitious for arbitrage.

Convex Risk Measures for the Aggregation of Multiple Information Sources and Applications in Insurance

Authors: Georgios I. Papayiannis, Athanasios N. Yannacopoulos

Categories: Risk Management

PDF: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2209.05211v1

Dates: originally published: 2022-09-12, updated: 2022-09-12

Summary: We propose a novel class of convex risk measures, based on the concept of the Fr\'echet mean, designed in order to handle uncertainty which arises from multiple information sources regarding the risk factors of interest. The proposed risk measures robustly characterize the exposure of the firm, by filtering out appropriately the partial information available in individual sources into an aggregate model for the risk factors of interest. Importantly, the proposed risks can be expressed in closed analytic forms allowing for interesting qualitative interpretations as well as comparative statics and thus facilitate their use in the everyday risk management process of the insurance firms. The potential use of the proposed risk measures in insurance is illustrated by two concrete applications, capital risk allocation and premia calculation under uncertainty.

Data-Driven Nonparametric Robust Control under Dependence Uncertainty

Authors: Erhan Bayraktar, Tao Chen

Categories: Optimization and Control, Mathematical Finance

PDF: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2209.04976v1

Dates: originally published: 2022-09-12, updated: 2022-09-12

Summary: We consider a multi-period stochastic control problem where the multivariate driving stochastic factor of the system has known marginal distributions but uncertain dependence structure. To solve the problem, we propose to implement the nonparametric adaptive robust control framework. We aim to find the optimal control against the worst-case copulae in a sequence of shrinking uncertainty sets which are generated from continuously observing the data. Then, we use a stochastic gradient descent ascent algorithm to numerically handle the corresponding high dimensional dynamic inf-sup optimization problem. We present the numerical results in the context of utility maximization and show that the controller benefits from knowing more information about the uncertain model.

Accurate and consistent calculation of the mean and variance in Monte-Carlo simulations

Authors: Jherek Healy

Categories: Computational Finance

PDF: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2206.10662v7

Dates: originally published: 2022-06-10, updated: 2022-09-12

Summary: In parallelized Monte-Carlo simulations, the order of summation is not always the same. When the mean is calculated in running fashion, this may create an artificial randomness in results which ought to be reproducible. This note takes a look at the problem and proposes to combine the running mean and variance algorithm with an accurate and robust summing algorithm in order to increase the accuracy and robustness of the Monte-Carlo estimates.

Multi-Dimensional self-exciting NBD process and Default portfolios

Authors: Masato Hisakado, Kodai Hattori, Shintaro Mori

Categories: Risk Management, Data Analysis, Statistics and Probability

PDF: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2205.14146v2

Dates: originally published: 2022-05-20, updated: 2022-09-13

Summary: In this study, we apply a multidimensional self-exciting negative binomial distribution (SE-NBD) process to default portfolios with 13 sectors. The SE-NBD process is a Poisson process with a gamma-distributed intensity function. We extend the SE-NBD process to a multidimensional process. Using the multidimensional SE-NBD process (MD-SE-NBD), we can estimate interactions between these 13 sectors as a network. By applying impact analysis, we can classify upstream and downstream sectors. The upstream sectors are real-estate and financial institution (FI) sectors. From these upstream sectors, shock spreads to the downstream sectors. This is an amplifier of the shock. This is consistent with the analysis of bubble bursts. We compare these results to the multidimensional Hawkes process (MD-Hawkes) that has a zero-variance intensity function.

Bitcoin Returns and Public Attention to COVID-19: Do Timing and Individualism Matter?

Authors: Huaxin Wang-Lu

Categories: General Finance

PDF: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2205.04290v3

Dates: originally published: 2022-05-09, updated: 2022-09-15

Summary: The evolution of the pandemic and people's concern over it have an impact on the Bitcoin market, while the extent of individualism could differentiate investor behaviors in the financial market during the pandemic. This paper examines whether public attention to COVID-19 in individualistic countries versus collectivistic countries Granger causes Bitcoin returns between February 11, 2020 and May 09, 2022. To this end, eight large economies with a individualistic or collectivistic tradition are chosen for analyses. By using rolling and recursive-evolving algorithms, it accounts for the timing of COVID-19 issues that vary by country and circumvents the potential estimation bias that a traditional Granger causality test may suffer due largely to Google's sampling variation for different time frames. In general, collectivistic countries are found to have stronger causal impacts on Bitcoin returns than individualistic countries.

Economic state classification and portfolio optimisation with application to stagflationary environments

Authors: Nick James, Max Menzies, Kevin Chin

Categories: Statistical Finance

PDF: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2203.15911v4

Dates: originally published: 2022-03-29, updated: 2022-09-13

Summary: Motivated by the current fears of a potentially stagflationary global economic environment, this paper uses new and recently introduced mathematical techniques to study multivariate time series pertaining to country inflation (CPI), economic growth (GDP) and equity index behaviours. We begin by assessing the temporal evolution among various economic phenomena, and complement this analysis with `economic driver analysis,' where we decouple country economic trajectories and determine what is most important in their association. Next, we study the temporal self-similarity of global inflation, growth and equity index returns to identify the most anomalous historic periods, and windows in the past that are most similar to current market dynamics. We then introduce a new algorithm to construct economic state classifications and compute an economic state integral, where countries are determined to belong in one of four candidate states based on their inflation and growth behaviours. Finally, we implement a decade-by-decade portfolio optimisation to determine which equity indices and portfolio assets have been most beneficial in maximising portfolio risk-adjusted returns in various market conditions. This could be of great interest to those looking for asset allocation guidance in the current period of high economic uncertainty.

Collaborative Insurance Sustainability and Network Structure

Authors: Arthur Charpentier, Lariosse Kouakou, Matthias Löwe, Philipp Ratz, Franck Vermet

Categories: Economics, Risk Management, Computational Finance

PDF: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2107.02764v2

Dates: originally published: 2021-07-05, updated: 2022-09-12

Summary: The peer-to-peer (P2P) economy has been growing with the advent of the Internet, with well known brands such as Uber or Airbnb being examples thereof. In the insurance sector the approach is still in its infancy, but some companies have started to explore P2P-based collaborative insurance products (eg. Lemonade in the U.S. or Inspeer in France). The actuarial literature only recently started to consider those risk sharing mechanisms, as in Denuit and Robert (2021) or Feng et al. (2021). In this paper, describe and analyse such a P2P product, with some reciprocal risk sharing contracts. Here, we consider the case where policyholders still have an insurance contract, but the first self-insurance layer, below the deductible, can be shared with friends. We study the impact of the shape of the network (through the distribution of degrees) on the risk reduction. We consider also some optimal setting of the reciprocal commitments, and discuss the introduction of contracts with friends of friends to mitigate some possible drawbacks of having people without enough connections to exchange risks.

Exploiting arbitrage requires short selling

Authors: Eckhard Platen, Stefan Tappe

Categories: Probability, Mathematical Finance

PDF: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2011.12523v5

Dates: originally published: 2020-11-25, updated: 2022-09-12

Summary: We show that in a financial market given by semimartingales an arbitrage opportunity, provided it exists, can only be exploited through short selling. This finding provides a theoretical basis for differences in regulation for financial services providers that are allowed to go short and those without short sales. The privilege to be allowed to short sell gives access to potential arbitrage opportunities, which creates by design a bankruptcy risk.

A Deep Learning Approach for Dynamic Balance Sheet Stress Testing

Authors: Anastasios Petropoulos, Vassilis Siakoulis, Konstantinos P. Panousis, Loukas Papadoulas, Sotirios Chatzis

Categories: Economics, Computational Finance

PDF: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2009.11075v2

Dates: originally published: 2020-09-23, updated: 2022-09-12

Summary: In the aftermath of the financial crisis, supervisory authorities have considerably altered the mode of operation of financial stress testing. Despite these efforts, significant concerns and extensive criticism have been raised by market participants regarding the considered unrealistic methodological assumptions and simplifications. Current stress testing methodologies attempt to simulate the risks underlying a financial institution's balance sheet by using several satellite models. This renders their integration a really challenging task, leading to significant estimation errors. Moreover, advanced statistical techniques that could potentially capture the non-linear nature of adverse shocks are still ignored. This work aims to address these criticisms and shortcomings by proposing a novel approach based on recent advances in Deep Learning towards a principled method for Dynamic Balance Sheet Stress Testing. Experimental results on a newly collected financial/supervisory dataset, provide strong empirical evidence that our paradigm significantly outperforms traditional approaches; thus, it is capable of more accurately and efficiently simulating real world scenarios.

** Original source code: https://github.com/machalejm/arxiv_scraper **


I DCA into the Reddit Index: These are the Top 7 Crypto Subreddits - Month 2

This is the 2nd month where I invested $20 into each of the top 7 crypto subreddits again. As a reference I also dca into the top 7 tech cryptos according to quantintegral.com. The results for the second month are as follows:

Input (2 months) Current Value (22-10-01) Cryptocurrencies
Reddit Index $280 $283.2 (+1.1%) BTC, ETH, DOGE, ADA, SHIB, LTC, XRP
Crypto Tech Index $280 $272.7 (-2.6%) ETH, BNB, DOT, ADA, AVAX, MATIC, IOTA

I also obtained data for the subreddit stats:

# for September 2022 Subscribers Minimum monthly active user volume
1. Bitcoin 4,596,431 430,929
2. DOGE 2,334,610 227,818
3. Ethereum 1,475,273 200,977
4. Cardano 697,929 120,550
5. Shiba-Inu 474,792 94,944
6. LTC 357,229 36,967
7. XRP 352,771 26,022
8. Monero (for info) 270,327 85,989

Minimum monthly active user volume: Estimated number of monthly active users by monitoring daily active users at different time zones.

I was surprised that the reddit index has held up quite well during these volatile times. When compared to the tech index, it actually outperformed it last month. Last month, there was a big event: The merger. Everyone had high hopes, but it was a case of buy the rumors, sell the news. The crypto market tanked during the Merge. One of the few cryptos holding strong was actually XRP. It saved the the reddit index and is also one of the main reason why the reddit portfolio is slightly in positive. It should be taken with a grain of salt that reddit 'outperformed' the crypto tech index and also the global crypto market (which consists of 46% BTC, 20% ETH and 34% Altcoins) due to few data points. I am still looking for how this experiment develops and unfolds.

Buying shitcoins still hurts, but I'm less concerned than I was last month. As a side note, by investing in so many coins, I became uninterested about the price of a single cryptocurrency. There would be so many prices to compare that I am unmotivated to look it up. By investing in the top 7 reddit/tech cryptos, I feel less emotional and it definitely relieves my psychological stress during the bear market.

For navigation:


IKONIC’S CLIP-TO-NFT PLATFORM

The keystone supporting the first four ventures is a pathbreaking product: an app that allows you to mint video gaming clips into NFTs. You can watch the demo of it in use here. It shows off how the app already has seamless integration that allows players to mint these NFTs straight from their hardware consoles! There is no competitor on the market for this concept, and IKONIC is ready to claim its first mover advantage. The app demo shows how usable it is for the everyday gamer, but the technology behind it can absolutely be of service to pro game streamers as well. This core product, and the community around it, will certainly be of strong interest to esports teams and events companies as well. But as we shall see, blockchain technology will enable them to generate even more revenue streams from their properties than they may have dared to think was possible.

#IKONIC #CRYPTO #BSC #BINANCE #BITCOIN https://www.ikonic.gg/


SOSHARUNETWORK TOKENOMICS

Total starting supply : 300.000.000.000 SNS token

SNS contract address: 0x90AF4Db753998d3a2ba69D56ff39B18ee0adeF97

TAX INFORMATION : 0% BUY 2.5% SELL

  • Dividents  : 0.5%
  • Liqudity    : 0.5%
  • Treasury / events : 0.5%
  • Buyback    : 0.5 %
  • burn : 0.5%

TOKEN DISTRIBUTION

  • Fairlaunch    : 40%
  • Liquidity       : 24%
  • partnership : 9%
  • staking : 10%
  • marketing  : 11% 
  • events : 3%
  • nft rewards : 3%

Kindly go to whitepaper for detailed information

#SOSHARUNETWORK #SOSHARU #BSC #BITCOIN #ROI https://sosharunetworks.com/


2022-10-01 - Knockout Outdoor 2022 | DOWNLOAD

2022-10-01 - Knockout Outdoor 2022 | DOWNLOAD
Single sets can be downloaded via a torrent client.
The source of the rip for 'Knockout Outdoor 2022' is their Twitch Stream.

The sheet with the sets can be found here:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1x8mWHlg7MjV7LuQMCZ1Ij9sRLQhB4OPOrrOXj7tqJDc/


If you use BitTorrent or μTorrent, shame on you. Get a good torrent client like qBittorrent or Deluge, they do not include advertisements and work as well, if not better.

How to download with qBittorrent
a less than 1 minute tutorial on how to download a liveset if do you do not have qBittorrent yet!
Use the pause button if it goes too fast ;)

To copy a link from the spreadsheet use 'CTRL+C' or any other equivalent for your OS.
You can also add all the livesets at once Example

Note: If you have issues with the download not starting, you can add my seedbox as a peer manually: 188.209.56.15:20117

Quick tutorial on how to do this Click me


If you are a DJ/Producer/Manager/Event Organisator and wish to have set(s) deleted, please reach out to me in DMs and I'll remove it/them.
I could ask you to verify your identity or affiliation with the DJ/Producer/Manager/Event Organisator. This will be done by, for example, proving ownership of an Instagram account, or sending an email from the company email.