Not to make mention of the other place, but XR is meant to be based on sociology, history and such. It is simply incorrect to say that violence hasn't been an important element, especially when non violent means have been exhausted. Bhagat Singh, Malcom X, Black Panthers, IRA, weathermen, communist struggles, American war of independence, their civil war, or anyone else's for that matter. Right or wrong, major system change doesn't just come from asking for it nicely.
It's the severity of it all too, we don't have another generation to 'have another go'. This really is, well, it.
I think I could live with it if we were at least being honest about what our current course of action means, but people actually believe these donkeys we have leading us. People will decry bystander deaths, but, are they not, essentially, already dead? Are we not committing millions, if not billions more, to a far slower, painful, unnecessary death?
What if bomb threats start getting called wherever the billionaires go? Pay money into a bitcoin fund to have a hit out on them and such? Force them to liquidise assets and immediately fund everything we need to happen? They pay no tax and are currently having a space cock competition in front of us while they literally plan for what they refer to as the 'event', planning to literally have their lackeys who defend them and the final scraps of resources fitted with a remote detonated necklaces to maintain control until the bitter end.
I mean I'm probably on a list now, and I apologise for all this not being all non violent and such, but billions starving and suffering gruesome ends is simply not peaceful, and XR claims to be devised by people who have studied history very closely, but even the most fleeting reading of history sees that as myopic.
No comments:
Post a Comment