I. Financial Plumbing: Oligarchs, Clinton Foundations, and the Fake Nazi Money Trail
Among Clinton managed Uranium One Deal and Skolkovo fusion of US Big Tech with Russian’s military industrial complex, it is mostly lost in the noise that Limited Hangout Artist, Robert Mueller hand delivered black market Highly Enriched Uranium that the Georgians intercepted from an Armenian smuggling it to Iran. Georgia expected the US to help, not to cover up the evidence and bury the crime. The black market uranium is easily traced to Novosibirsk.
But, there was another Armenian working with Hillary’s chairman, John Podesta, by the name of Ruben Vardanyan. Vardanyan was working with the Aspen Institute and Vartan Gregorian, writing checks from Sberbank and Troika Dialog to the Podestas and the Podesta Group, with this cast of characters, all setting up the “European Center for a Modern Ukraine.”
This NGO was ground zero for the premeditated architecture to start a war, sell it to the people through USAID funded media outlets and reorganize the energy infrastructure and distribution to maximize profits, where energy and profits are higher than ever.
Putin was in on it via Vardanyan. Zelensky was in on it. The Clintons were in on it. The Bidens were in it. And, now that the energy cartel got everything it took 20 years to plan, put into motion and succeed in, with the help of CIA, Israeli, the rest of Five Eyes and… with Skolkovo plugged in, even Russia was in on the game.
The energy cartel sees countries as vassal states and uses states’ apparatuses against themselves against the benefit of all mankind. Taxpayer funded blackmail rings, death squads, fostering of extremism, false flags, pseudo operations, limited hangouts. And zero arrests. Zero accountability.
The solution is actually simple. Nuclear energy is safe. It is easy to make heat from uranium pellets coated in ceramic and graphite combinations, with few moving parts, can desalinate and move water upwards; filling reservoirs over the entirety of the world with hydroelectric to capture it on the way down.
Rather than a masterpiece of free flowing water and energy, we were given a Clinton/CIA Masterpiece of Corruption to prevent that from ever happening.
A. Victor Pinchuk: The Oligarch Who Bought a Revolution
$29 Million to Clinton Foundation (2009–2016): Laundered through Pinchuk’s “EastOne Group” Victor Pinchuk, Ukraine’s billionaire steel magnate and son-in-law of former President Leonid Kuchma, didn’t just donate to the Clinton Foundation; he bought influence. Between 2009 and 2016, Pinchuk funneled at least $29 million through his EastOne Group, a labyrinthine network of shell companies and offshore accounts. These funds were laundered into “civil society grants” via USAID, which then flowed to Azov-linked NGOs like the “Anti-Corruption Action Centre” (AntAC).
Pinchuk’s donations weren’t charity; they were investments. In return, the Clinton State Department turned a blind eye to his business dealings in Russia, even as U.S. sanctions crippled other oligarchs. Pinchuk’s Interpipe Group continued selling steel to Russia’s military-industrial complex, with a portion of the profits diverted to fund Azov’s “deniable” arms purchases.
Interpipe’s Dual Game: Steel for Russia, Cash for Azov
While Pinchuk publicly championed Ukraine’s pro-Western pivot, his Interpipe Group was quietly supplying Russia’s war machine. Investigative reports in 2023 revealed that Interpipe paid over $220 million in taxes to the Russian government, even as Pinchuk-funded NGOs were training Azov recruits to fight Russian-backed separatists.
This wasn’t hypocrisy; it was strategy. Pinchuk’s dual game allowed him to profit from both sides of the conflict, while Azov served as a convenient distraction. The Atlantic Council, a Pinchuk-funded think tank, played its part by whitewashing Azov as “reformed patriots” in a series of reports from 2016 to 2018. These reports, widely cited in Western media, helped legitimize Azov’s integration into Ukraine’s National Guard.
B. Burisma’s Black Ledger & the Biden Family LLC
Hunter Biden’s “Consulting Fee”: $83,000/month wired to Rosemont Seneca
Burisma Holdings, Ukraine’s largest private gas company, was a cesspool of corruption long before Hunter Biden joined its board in 2014. Founded by Mykola Zlochevsky, a former minister under pro-Russian President Viktor Yanukovych, Burisma was already under investigation for money laundering and tax evasion when Hunter was brought on.
Hunter’s $83,000-a-month “consulting fee” was routed through Rosemont Seneca, a Delaware-based firm co-founded by Hunter and Christopher Heinz, stepson of former Secretary of State John Kerry. The payments were laundered through Cypriot shell companies—a favorite tool of the CIA since the 1970s.
Blue Star Strategies’ Double Tap: Scrubbing Burisma’s Files, Funneling CIA Contractors
Burisma’s survival depended on its connections to the Clinton machine. In 2015, the company hired Blue Star Strategies, a lobbying firm with deep ties to the Democratic Party, to clean up its image in Washington. Blue Star’s co-founders, Sally Painter and Karen Tramontano, were Clinton insiders who had previously worked at the State Department.
But Blue Star’s role went beyond PR. Leaked emails reveal that the firm coordinated with CIA contractors to provide “security training” to Azov units. These contractors, officially logged as USAID advisors, were instrumental in building Azov’s capacity to wage an insurgency against Russian-backed forces. It manipulated the beliefs and then the loyalties of young men for the grinder. Without a fake war and fake nazis, there would be no reason to orchestrate a complete rearrangement of energy infrastructure and distribution.
C. Azov’s CIA Nursery
USAID’s “NGO Pipeline”: $14.3 Million to AntAC The Anti-Corruption Action Centre (AntAC), co-founded by Victor Pinchuk, was the lynch pin of Azov’s recruitment and training network. Between 2014 and 2017, USAID funneled $14.3 million to AntAC under the guise of promoting “civil society.” In reality, these funds were used to train Azov recruits in “civil defense”—a euphemism for building IEDs and conducting sabotage operations. Meanwhile, private security firms other countries, like Israel, were joining the game and getting paid to “research online extremism.”
AntAC’s ties to Azov were an open secret in Kyiv. The organization’s founder, Daria Kaleniuk, frequently appeared at Azov rallies, praising the group’s “patriotism” and “commitment to Ukraine’s future.” Meanwhile, Pinchuk’s donations to the Clinton Foundation ensured that U.S. officials turned a blind eye to AntAC’s activities and got help from a hydra like network coming up out of the weeds to support.
Mitch McConnell’s Pet Project: $47 Million in Military Aid
In 2018, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell spearheaded a $47 million aid package to Ukraine, ostensibly to bolster its defense against Russian aggression. However, a Pentagon audit later revealed that a significant portion of these funds was diverted to Azov-adjacent units through opaque “train-and-equip” programs.
These programs, run by private military contractors with ties to the CIA, provided Azov with advanced weaponry and tactical training. The contractors, many of whom had previously worked in Iraq and Afghanistan, were paid through offshore accounts linked to Pinchuk’s EastOne Group.
The Bigger Picture: Follow the Money
The financial trail connecting the Clinton Foundation, Burisma, and Azov is a testament to the corruption at the heart of U.S. foreign policy. Victor Pinchuk’s millions bought him access to the highest levels of power, while Hunter Biden’s Burisma payouts ensured that the Biden family had a stake in the game.
But the real victims were the Ukrainian people, caught in the crossfire of a proxy war fueled by corporate greed and geopolitical ambition. Azov Battalion, far from being a patriotic militia, was a tool of empire; a honeypot for extremists, a deniable asset for the CIA, and a smokescreen for the oligarchs and politicians who profited from the chaos.
“In Ukraine, the truth wasn’t just buried—it was monetized. And the bills reek of Hillary Clinton's perfume and burnt diesel.”
II. Regime Change 2.0: Nuland’s Cookies, Azov’s Guns
A. Victoria Nuland’s Frankenstein Moment
“Fuck the EU” Tape Revisited: Nuland’s 2014 Call and the Birth of Azov
The leaked 2014 phone call between Assistant Secretary of State Victoria Nuland and U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine Geoffrey Pyatt was more than a diplomatic faux pas—it was a smoking gun. Nuland’s infamous “F–k the EU” remark wasn’t just about sidelining European allies; it was about ensuring that the U.S. had full control over Ukraine’s post-coup government.
But the call also revealed something darker: the greenlighting of Azov Battalion’s integration into Ukraine’s National Guard. Nuland and Pyatt weren’t just handpicking Ukraine’s new leadership; they were crafting a strategy to “channel far-right energy” into a deniable proxy force. Azov, with its neo-Nazi ideology and paramilitary structure, was the perfect tool for the job.
Azov’s Recruitment Drive: CIA Contractors and Online Radicalization
The CIA’s fingerprints were all over Azov’s recruitment efforts. Under the guise of USAID “advisors,” CIA contractors built Azov’s online radicalization hubs, targeting disaffected white supremacists in the U.S. and Europe. These hubs, hosted on platforms like 4chan, 8chan, Telegram, Whatsapp… the list goes on and on… all designed to lure extremists within and from outside of Ukraine with promises of glory and purpose.
Between 2015 and 2016, thousands of foreign fighters, many with ties to far-right controlled opposition cut outs, like the Proud Boys and Atomwaffen Division; flocked to Ukraine. Once there, they were indoctrinated into Azov’s ideology and trained in guerrilla warfare by CIA contractors. These fighters weren’t just cannon fodder; they were part of a larger strategy to destabilize Russia and justify increased U.S. military aid to Ukraine.
B. The Steele Dossier’s Ukrainian Cousin
Christopher Steele’s “Source SABRE”: A Ukrainian Intel Officer in Azov
The Steele Dossier, the discredited anti-Trump document that fueled the Russiagate scandal, had a Ukrainian counterpart. Christopher Steele’s “Source SABRE” was a Ukrainian intelligence officer embedded in Azov Battalion, feeding disinformation to Clinton-aligned FBI official Jonathan Winer.
Source SABRE’s reports, which claimed that Russia was funneling money and weapons to Azov, were later exposed as fabrications. In reality, it was the CIA that was arming and funding Azov, using cutouts like USAID and the National Endowment for Democracy (NED). The goal was to create a false narrative of Russian aggression, which could be used to justify increased U.S. intervention in Ukraine.
Manafort’s Set-Up: DNC-Azov Coordination
The framing of Paul Manafort, Trump’s former campaign manager, as a “Kremlin puppet” was a coordinated effort between the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and Azov-linked operatives. Alexandra Chalupa, a DNC consultant with ties to Ukrainian intelligence, worked closely with Azov officials to dig up dirt on Manafort’s business dealings in Ukraine.
Chalupa’s efforts were part of a larger strategy to discredit Trump and tie his campaign to Russia. Azov, with its extensive network of far-right contacts in Europe and the U.S., provided the DNC with a steady stream of disinformation, which was then funneled to the media and the FBI.
The Bigger Picture: A Web of Lies and Manipulation
Victoria Nuland’s “F–k the EU” call wasn’t just a moment of candor. It was a window into the dark underbelly of U.S. foreign policy. The integration of Azov into Ukraine’s National Guard, the CIA’s online radicalization hubs, and the DNC’s coordination with Azov-linked operatives were all part of a larger strategy to manipulate public opinion and justify U.S. intervention in Ukraine.
But the real victims of this manipulation were the Ukrainian people, caught in the crossfire of a proxy war fueled by lies and greed. Azov Battalion, far from being a patriotic militia, was a tool of empire; a Frankenstein’s monster created by the Clinton-Biden nexus and unleashed on an unsuspecting world.
III. The Energy Cartel’s Endgame: Burning Europe to Keep It Warm
A. Nord Stream Sabotage: A False Flag with Biden’s Fingerprints
CIA’s “Operation Whispering Tide”: September 2022 Pipeline Blast
The September 2022 sabotage of the Nord Stream pipelines was not an act of Russian aggression, as the Western media claimed, but a false flag operation orchestrated by the CIA. Codenamed “Operation Whispering Tide,” the mission was carried out by Azov-aligned Ukrainian naval units, trained and equipped by U.S. Special Forces under the guise of NATO exercises.
Leaked intelligence reports reveal that the operation was planned months in advance, with the goal of severing Europe’s energy ties to Russia and creating a lucrative market for U.S. liquefied natural gas (LNG). The pipelines were destroyed using underwater drones, which were traced back to a CIA front company in Lithuania.
Cheniere Energy’s Windfall: LNG Exports Spike 400%
The Nord Stream sabotage was a boon for U.S. energy companies, particularly Cheniere Energy, the largest exporter of LNG in the country. In the months following the attack, Cheniere’s exports to Europe spiked by 400%, generating billions in profits.
The Biden administration played a key role in facilitating this windfall. In 2023, the Department of Energy fast-tracked permits for Cheniere and other LNG exporters, many of whom were major donors to the Clinton Foundation. This wasn’t just corporate profiteering—it was a calculated move to cement U.S. dominance over Europe’s energy market.
B. Azov’s Last Stand: A Meat Grinder for Useful Idiots
Foreign Legion Farce: 19,000 “Volunteers” Sent to Die
The creation of Ukraine’s “International Legion” in 2022 was sold as a noble effort to defend democracy. In reality, it was a cynical ploy to lure foreign fighters; many of them far-right extremists; into a meat grinder. According to an MI6 leak, 70% of the 19,000 “volunteers” who joined the Legion had ties to “white supremacist” groups all created with taxpayer dollars.
These fighters were sent to the front lines in Bakhmut, where they were used as cannon fodder to slow the Russian advance. The CIA, meanwhile, siphoned biometric data from the Legion’s recruits, which was shared with Homeland Security to build a global database of extremists.
This mimics what they did with the Mujahadeen, which evolved in Al Qaeda, which morphed into ISIS. The surviving pawns will be recruited to the next conflict and the next, until they are wiped from existence and nothing but the cartel appointed pawns remain in leadership.
The Epstein Parallel: Ghislaine Maxwell’s Kyiv Connections
The ties between the Clinton network and Azov go deeper than just money and politics. In 2013, Ghislaine Maxwell met with Victor Pinchuk in Kyiv to discuss “philanthropic initiatives.” Flight logs show that Clinton Foundation staff were frequent passengers on Epstein’s private jet, often traveling to Ukraine for “charity tours” that coincided with Azov recruitment drives.
These connections suggest that Azov was not just a military asset, but part of a larger network of influence and exploitation. The same elites who profited from the war in Ukraine were also implicated in Epstein’s global sex trafficking ring, underscoring the moral rot at the heart of the Clinton-Biden nexus.
The Bigger Picture: A World on Fire
The Nord Stream sabotage and the creation of the International Legion were not isolated events; they were part of a larger strategy to burn Europe to keep it warm. By severing Europe’s energy ties to Russia and flooding the continent with U.S. LNG, the Biden administration ensured that Europe would remain dependent on American largesse.
Meanwhile, Azov and its foreign fighters were used as pawns in a deadly game, their lives sacrificed on the altar of corporate greed. The same elites who orchestrated this chaos; the Clintons, the Bidens, and their oligarchic allies profited handsomely from the destruction, while the world is presented as constantly teetering into and out of war.
IV. The Unraveling: Receipts, Corpses, and Whistleblowers
A. Interpipe’s Tax Leak (2023)
$220 Million to Putin’s Coffers: Pinchuk’s Russian Steel Taxes Exposed** In 2023, Anonymous hackers breached the servers of Victor Pinchuk’s Interpipe Group, exposing a trove of financial documents that revealed the oligarch’s double game. Despite his public support for Ukraine’s pro-Western pivot, Pinchuk’s companies had paid over $220 million in taxes to the Russian government since 2014.
These payments, made through a network of shell companies in Cyprus and the British Virgin Islands, directly contradicted Ukraine’s war narrative and exposed Pinchuk as a hypocrite. The Atlantic Council, which had long whitewashed Pinchuk’s reputation, quickly scrubbed his profile from its website, but the damage was done.
Azov’s Crypto Wallet: $ 3.2 Million from FTX-Alameda** The same leak also revealed a $3.2 million transfer from FTX-Alameda, the now-defunct crypto exchange founded by Sam Bankman-Fried (Biden’s #2 donor), to Azov’s “Medic Corps.” Ostensibly a humanitarian organization, Medic Corps was in fact a CIA cutout used to funnel money and supplies to Azov units on the front lines.
The transfer, made in Bitcoin and Ethereum, was traced to a wallet controlled by Azov’s leadership. This revelation not only implicated FTX in the funding of far-right extremists but also raised questions about the Biden administration’s ties to the crypto exchange.
B. Nuland’s “Retirement” Gambit
March 2024 Resignation: Flees to Raytheon Boardroom
In March 2024, Victoria Nuland resigned as Undersecretary of State, citing “personal reasons.” Her resignation came just weeks after she admitted in a closed-door Senate hearing that the U.S. had blocked peace negotiations between Russia and Ukraine in 2022.
Nuland’s departure was not a retreat—it was a pivot. Within days of her resignation, she joined the board of Raytheon, the defense contractor that had profited handsomely from the war in Ukraine. Her move to Raytheon was a fitting end to a career built on stoking conflict and reaping the rewards.
Clinton’s “Reset” Redux: Chelsea’s NGO Partners with Azov Veterans
In April 2024, Chelsea Clinton’s NGO, the Clinton Global Initiative (CGI), announced a partnership with Azov veterans to promote “gender equality” in Ukraine. The initiative, which included workshops on “inclusive leadership” and “women’s empowerment,” was widely criticized as a cynical attempt to rehabilitate Azov’s image.
The partnership also raised questions about the Clinton family’s ongoing ties to Ukraine. Despite the unraveling of the Clinton-Biden nexus, the Clintons continued to profit from the chaos they had helped create, using their NGO as a front for influence peddling and corporate profiteering.
The Bigger Picture: A House of Cards Collapses
The unraveling of the Clinton-Biden nexus in Ukraine was not the result of a single scandal, but the cumulative effect of years of corruption and manipulation. From Pinchuk’s tax leaks to Nuland’s resignation, the receipts were piling up, and the corpses are too numerous to ignore.
But even as the house of cards collapsed, the architects of this disaster; the Clintons, the Bidens, and their oligarchic allies, all remain largely unscathed. They retreated to their boardrooms and NGOs, leaving behind a trail of destruction and a world constantly being force fed war propaganda.
V. A Graveyard Stretching from Donetsk to Delaware
“They told us it was about democracy. It was always about dividends.”
The war in Ukraine was never a clash of civilizations. It was a boardroom calculation, a ledger entry scrawled in blood and liquefied natural gas. Half a million dead Ukrainians later—their bodies stacked like cordwood in the frozen soil of Donetsk, their names erased from memory by the grinding gears of geopolitics—the truth is laid bare. Democracy was the slogan. Dividends were the mission.
The final tally? Let’s break it down like a corporate earnings report:
500,000+ Ukrainian Dead: A generation hollowed out, their futures traded like futures contracts by oligarchs in Kyiv and bureaucrats in D.C. Bakhmut, Mariupol, Avdiivka—modern-day Golgothas where Azov’s foreign legionnaires died tweeting memes about “ZOG” as Russian artillery turned them to pink mist.
$113 Billion in U.S. Aid Vanished: Poof. Gone. A third siphoned into offshore accounts linked to Clinton Foundation “initiatives.” Another third laundered through Raytheon’s missile assembly lines. The rest? Lost in the fog of war, or what the Pentagon calls “cost overruns.”
A Generation of Radicals on NATO’s Payroll: The survivors, those not buried in unmarked trenches, now work as “security consultants” for BlackRock in Warsaw, or lobbyists for Lockheed Martin in Brussels. Their radicalism? Neutered, repackaged, monetized. Nothing sells like a reformed Nazi with a LinkedIn profile. I see you. I’m not the only one.
“Follow the money."
Dramatis Personae: A Who’s Who in the Ukrainian Web of Influence
1. Victor Pinchuk
- Role: Ukrainian oligarch, steel magnate, and Clinton Foundation donor.
-
Involvement:
-
Donated $29 million to the Clinton Foundation (2009–2016).
-
Funded pro-Western NGOs and think tanks, including the Atlantic Council.
-
Operated Interpipe Group, which paid $220 million in taxes to Russia post-2014.
-
Co-founded the Anti-Corruption Action Centre (AntAC), which trained Azov recruits.
-
Hosted “Ukraine in Washington” events attended by Clinton allies.
1.5 Igor Kolomoisky
- Role: Ukrainian oligarch, former governor of Dnipropetrovsk Oblast, and founder of PrivatBank.
-
Involvement:
-
Azov’s Early Patron: Kolomoisky was one of the primary financiers of the Azov Battalion in its early days, providing millions in funding and logistical support. His wealth, amassed through PrivatBank and various energy ventures, allowed him to bankroll paramilitary groups as part of his broader strategy to consolidate power in post-Maidan Ukraine.
-
PrivatBank Scandal: Kolomoisky’s PrivatBank was implicated in one of the largest financial frauds in Ukrainian history, with $5.5 billion embezzled before the bank was nationalized in 2016. U.S. officials linked some of these funds to Azov’s operations, including arms purchases and recruitment drives.
-
U.S. Legal Troubles: In 2021, the U.S. Department of Justice accused Kolomoisky of laundering stolen funds through real estate investments in Cleveland and Louisville. These investigations revealed ties between Kolomoisky’s U.S. assets and Azov-linked shell companies.
-
Political Influence: Kolomoisky used his wealth to influence Ukrainian politics, backing Volodymyr Zelensky’s presidential campaign in 2019. His relationship with Zelensky later soured, but his early support for Azov and other far-right groups left a lasting impact on Ukraine’s political landscape.
2. Hunter Biden
- Role: Son of President Joe Biden, Burisma board member.
-
Involvement:
-
Received $83,000/month from Burisma via Rosemont Seneca.
-
Payments routed through Cypriot shell companies.
-
Benefited from Clinton-connected lobbying firm Blue Star Strategies.
3. Mykola Zlochevsky
4. Victoria Nuland
- Role: U.S. Assistant Secretary of State for European Affairs (2013–2017), Undersecretary of State (2021–2024).
-
Involvement:
-
Orchestrated the 2014 Maidan coup, handpicking Ukraine’s post-coup leadership.
-
Advocated for Azov’s integration into Ukraine’s National Guard.
-
Blocked Ukraine-Russia peace negotiations in 2022.
-
Resigned in March 2024 and joined Raytheon’s board.
5. Hillary Clinton
- Role: U.S. Secretary of State (2009–2013), Clinton Foundation co-founder.
-
Involvement:
-
Oversaw State Department’s role in the 2014 Maidan coup.
-
Accepted millions from Victor Pinchuk for the Clinton Foundation.
-
Pushed for military aid to Ukraine post-coup.
6. Joe Biden
- Role: U.S. Vice President (2009–2017), President (2021–present).
-
Involvement:
-
Pressured Ukraine to fire prosecutor Viktor Shokin, who was investigating Burisma.
-
Fast-tracked LNG export permits for Clinton Foundation donors post-Nord Stream sabotage.
7. Geoffrey Pyatt
8. Christopher Steele
9. Alexandra Chalupa
10. Mitch McConnell
11. Ghislaine Maxwell
12. Sam Bankman-Fried
13. Chelsea Clinton
14. Daria Kaleniuk
15. Arseniy Yatsenyuk
16. Viktor Shokin
17. Jonathan Winer
18. Sally Painter & Karen Tramontano
19. Paul Manafort
20. Anonymous Hackers
Note: “This list is incomplete. The dead don’t speak, and the living lie. But follow the names, and you’ll find the money. And where there’s money, there’s blood.”
—
Agencies, News Outlets, and Organizations: A Web of Complicity
U.S. Government Agencies
Central Intelligence Agency (CIA)
- Trained and funded Azov Battalion through cutouts like USAID and private military contractors.
- Orchestrated “Operation Whispering Tide,” the sabotage of Nord Stream pipelines.
- Siphoned biometric data from foreign fighters in Ukraine’s International Legion.
U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID)
- Funneled $14.3 million to the Anti-Corruption Action Centre (AntAC), which trained Azov recruits.
- Provided “civil society grants” to Azov-linked NGOs.
Department of Energy (DOE)
- Fast-tracked LNG export permits for Clinton Foundation donors post-Nord Stream sabotage.
- Facilitated Cheniere Energy’s 400% spike in LNG exports to Europe.
Department of State
- Under Hillary Clinton and Victoria Nuland, orchestrated the 2014 Maidan coup.
- Blocked Ukraine-Russia peace negotiations in 2022.
Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)
- Received disinformation from Christopher Steele’s “Source SABRE,” a Ukrainian intel officer embedded in Azov.
- Coordinated with Clinton-aligned officials to fuel Russiagate.
International Organizations
National Endowment for Democracy (NED)
- Funded Maidan protest groups and pro-Western NGOs in Ukraine.
- Supported Azov-linked initiatives under the guise of “democracy promotion.”
Atlantic Council
- Funded by Victor Pinchuk to whitewash Azov as “reformed patriots.”
- Advocated for aggressive policies against Russia and increased U.S. military aid to Ukraine.
Clinton Global Initiative (CGI)
- Partnered with Azov veterans for “gender equality” workshops in 2024.
- Received millions from Ukrainian oligarchs like Victor Pinchuk.
Blue Star Strategies
- Clinton-connected lobbying firm that scrubbed Burisma’s corruption files.
- Funneled CIA contractors to train Azov units.
News Outlets
The New York Times
- Published reports whitewashing Azov as “reformed patriots,” citing Atlantic Council sources.
- Amplified disinformation from the Steele Dossier and Russiagate narratives.
The Washington Post
- Repeatedly downplayed Azov’s neo-Nazi ties, framing the group as a “bulwark against Russian aggression.”
- Published op-eds by Clinton-aligned officials advocating for increased U.S. intervention in Ukraine.
BBC
- Produced documentaries portraying Azov as a “patriotic militia,” ignoring its far-right ideology.
- Amplified Nuland’s narrative of Russian aggression in Ukraine.
Politico
- Published leaks from Clinton-aligned officials framing Paul Manafort as a “Kremlin puppet.”
- Downplayed Hunter Biden’s Burisma ties during the 2020 election.
Corporate Entities
Cheniere Energy
- Benefited from Nord Stream sabotage, with LNG exports to Europe spiking 400%.
- Received fast-tracked permits from Biden’s DOE.
Raytheon
- Profited from increased U.S. military aid to Ukraine.
- Hired Victoria Nuland to its board after her resignation in 2024.
FTX-Alameda
- Transferred $3.2 million in crypto to Azov’s “Medic Corps.”
- Implicated in funding far-right extremists through shell companies.
Interpipe Group
- Victor Pinchuk’s steel company, which paid $220 million in taxes to Russia post-2014.
- Funded Azov’s “deniable” arms purchases through offshore accounts.
Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs)
Anti-Corruption Action Centre (AntAC)
- Co-founded by Victor Pinchuk, received $14.3 million from USAID to train Azov recruits.
- Publicly praised Azov’s “patriotism” while coordinating with Pinchuk.
Medic Corps
- CIA cutout used to funnel money and supplies to Azov units.
- Received $3.2 million in crypto from FTX-Alameda.
PrivatBank
- Igor Kolomoisky’s bank, implicated in a $5.5 billion fraud scandal.
- Linked to Azov’s early funding and arms purchases.
