Sunday, October 5, 2025

So most (if not all) of the Bible has no scientific, archeological, or historical basis (meaning it’s false)

Would this mean that the later books of the New Testament including the book of revelation is false as well? They mention the “antichrist” and the definition of the “antichrist” is “liar, deceiver, denying Christ was executed and rose on the third day to atone for our sins, and denying that Christ is gods son.” There always has been and will be millions if not billions of “antichrists” on this earth. And im pretty sure that not only is pretty much the entire Bible false (with evidence stacked against it and its claims), but it also uses a lot of metaphors and examples. I honestly feel like the book of revelations must be a metaphor for some type of world changing event, such as a new world order or AI takeover. And im thinking if it actually comes true it won’t be in the sense of what Christians describe it as. It will more likely be humanity finally advancing past the stage of physical money (including prototypes of electronic currency like bitcoin) and there will be a chip that corresponds to Elon Musk’s neuralink. There are already electric chip implants that pay the store the second you walk out the door. And the person claiming to be god won’t be because he is the “antichrist” but because it is a politically motivated menuver for some corrupt agenda to control abrahamic faith followers. And the “beast” is likely just a metaphor for advanced technology that was far behind their time in the Middle Ages, they would call a computer from 2005 “the beast” because they wouldn’t understand how it works and it’s far more powerful than what they had. 20 years later we have the iPhone 17 pro max and quantum AI super computers so just imagine what they would call our modern day tech when they would’ve called the primate of our modern technology “blasphemy” and “the beast”. Am I correct on the idea that I’m proposing right now? Lmk in the comments or add anything I forgot to mention something.


No comments:

Post a Comment